On Sun, 2001-11-11 at 13:31, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
problem snipped since all relevance is right here below
My /etc/hosts contains the following:
127.0.0.1 maranatha
This is most likely the root of your problems. Your computer can't find
any reference to the localhost.
Change
Ok, I' didn't think I was supposed to have a static ip, but my internet
address acording to ifconfig has stayed the same; is that normal? It's a
different address, by the way, if I take out dhcpcd and use pump; I did
that to see what would happen. Also, my nameservers in /etc/resolve.conf
are both
of an expert), that localhost traffic uses.
--mike
Are you saying that dhcpcd can't be used with dynamic ips; my
understanding was that dhcpcd and dhcp-client and pump were basically
equivalent
programs, or at least had equivalent purposes.
find
any reference to the localhost.
Change this to:
127.0.0.1 localhost
or
127.0.0.1 localhost maranatha
Actually, you'll probably want the line
127.0.0.1 maranatha.domain.tld maranatha localhost
where `maranatha.domain.tld' is your host's fully-qualified domain name.
Otherwise
Lo, on , November 11, Michael Heldebrant did write:
lo should be there, it's going to be the major interface, if not the
only interface (I can't think of why it wouldn't but ... *shrug* I'm not
that much of an expert), that localhost traffic uses.
My understanding is that it depends
I have just installed (apt-get install) lprng and magicfilter - woody
system. My printcap file seems ok.
at the command lpr ~/test I get the error message:
Get_local_host: 'localhost' IP address not available!
and the command is aborted.
I am unable to diagnose this problem and would
Hello,
I'm running Debian woody with a 2.4.10 custom kernel.
In response to telnet 127.0.0.1 I get this error:
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
I can ping 127.0.0.1 but not telnet to it. I'm guessing telnet connectivity
is turned off by default. Where do I go to
John Purser wrote:
I'm running Debian woody with a 2.4.10 custom kernel.
In response to telnet 127.0.0.1 I get this error:
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
I can ping 127.0.0.1 but not telnet to it. I'm guessing telnet connectivity
is turned off by default.
On Thu, 2001-10-25 at 12:02, John Purser wrote:
Hello,
I'm running Debian woody with a 2.4.10 custom kernel.
In response to telnet 127.0.0.1 I get this error:
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
I can ping 127.0.0.1 but not telnet to it. I'm guessing telnet
Better to leave it off. No reason to install an insecure program just
because of a test. If you want telnet-style functionality, use ssh.
What I do:
apt-get install ssh
# Note: install server as daemon
# disable crap in inetd
apt-get -y remove --purge talkd telnetd fingerd pidentd biff
~mark
protocol, such as ssh, instead.
Where do I go to turn it on? I haven't used
telnet on my network before but it's suggested as a test in a HOW-TO I'm
working through.
# apt-get install telnetd-ssl telnet-ssl
# telnet localhost
# apt-get remove --purge telnetd-ssl
# apt-get install ssh
* John Purser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.25 11:02:02-0600]:
I can ping 127.0.0.1 but not telnet to it. I'm guessing telnet connectivity
is turned off by default. Where do I go to turn it on? I haven't used
telnet on my network before but it's suggested as a test in a HOW-TO I'm
working
:10
To: Debian-User (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Unable to telnet to localhost
Better to leave it off. No reason to install an insecure program just
because of a test. If you want telnet-style functionality, use ssh.
What I do:
apt-get install ssh
# Note: install server as daemon
# disable crap
on Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:39:55PM -0400, Walter Tautz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I keep getting
1003520003.279 2 127.0.0.1 TCP_DENIED/403 1100 GET some url on the web
ACLs?
Squid logs?
--
Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of
that will accomplish the simple task of
allowing me to set up a proxy server on my localhost and then use a browser
on the same localhost. Note that I am only running apache-ssl...
-walter
ps.
I keep getting
1003520003.279 2 127.0.0.1 TCP_DENIED/403 1100 GET some url on the web
What gives... I am using the woody default install with some minors editing
as suggested in QuickStart
Basically I would like to use a browser on the localhost to use squid running
Does anyone have a configuration file that will accomplish the simple task of
allowing me to set up a proxy server on my localhost and then use a browser
on the same localhost. Note that I am only running apache-ssl...
edit /etc/squid.conf. In the section with the other ACLs, add
20 08:11:51 treehouse fetchmail[23858]: About to rewrite Return-path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M Rewritten version is Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Aug 20 08:11:51 treehouse fetchmail[23858]: forwarding to localhost
Aug 20 08:11:51 treehouse fetchmail[23858]: SMTP MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIZE
Why does exim (on my potato) not deliver mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have some mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in /var/spool/exim/input.
This mail does not get delivered doing (as root):
/usr/sbin/exim -qf
I read in /var/spool/exim/msglog/ [line breaks inserted]
2001-08-19 07:30:14 [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 04:32:53PM +0200, Robert Epprecht wrote:
Why does exim (on my potato) not deliver mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because exim defalt prohibits it for the security concern.
Check your /etc/exim.conf. Mine has:
# No local deliveries will ever be run under the uids of
debs,
i have a box that won't load potato, so i
installed slink for booting purposes.
now, from the net, i want to install the custom
packages from potato. however, i can't ping my
box's ip addy (nor any other ip addy on my network).
but, i can ping localhost.
the nic is good--works
what does /sbin/route display?
also, i hope you aren't trying to use the 192.168.1.xxx address
directly. i.e. i hope that your DSL router, or your NAT router sits
between your machine and the net.
martin
[greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@@@.net
NAT router sits
between your machine and the net.
//
...correct. but this slink box (w/ ip addy 192.168.1.64) can't ping the dsl
router (192.168.1.250) nor itself (192.168.1.64). it can only ping 127.0.0.1
(localhost).
(it's too weird, eh?)
thx.
bentley taylor.
//
martin
[greetings
also sprach pplaw (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 02:26:42PM +):
cat /sbin/route gives me garbage characters. (am i using the wrong command?)
just run /sbin/route.
actually, run
/sbin/route -n
martin
ps: garbage characters... the file starts out with ^?ELF which
indicates that it is a binary
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 04:29:35PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach pplaw (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 02:26:42PM +):
cat /sbin/route gives me garbage characters. (am i using the wrong
command?)
just run /sbin/route.
actually, run
/sbin/route -n
martin
ps: garbage
also sprach pplaw (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 02:52:32PM +):
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 01 lo
well, you aren't routing anything via eth0. this may be due to a
configuration
(192.168.1.250) nor itself (192.168.1.64). it can only ping 127.0.0.1
(localhost).
(it's too weird, eh?)
thx.
bentley taylor.
//
martin
[greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@@@.net
--
windoze 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 04:52:49PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach pplaw (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 02:52:32PM +):
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 01 lo
well, you aren't
now i just need to specify my isp's dns's (207.76.102.251/252). (i
forget where that's specified. locate *dns* gave me cold leads.)
where do i set that?
/etc/resolv.conf
are you using a laptop or a desktop?
i am assuming the latter, so please do a
man interfaces
to find out how to
debs,
please ignor prior messageproblem resolved. (i
didn't enter martin's suggestion exactly like he
wrote and i got the wrong results. his info was
right on the money! thanks!)
i can ping all key players--myself, the lan, and the
isp(i didn't know pinging could be this
also sprach pplaw (on Mon, 05 Mar 2001 04:09:33PM +):
i can ping all key players--myself, the lan, and the
isp(i didn't know pinging could be this
beautiful).
true. true.
martin, thanks again.
no prob. someone helped me with that too at one point. since then i
can do routing tables
Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Troy Telford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 1:51
PMTo: debian-user@lists.debian.orgSubject: eth0 detected
by kernel, ifconfig, ifup/ifdown can't configure it. lo (localhost) also has
same problem.
I
I'm running SID and recently upgraded the kernel from the Potato 2.2.17
to kernel-image-2.2.18. Now I'm getting all these weird errors about
modules being out of date. I'm also getting no response when I try to
ping localhost (which is probaly why junkbuster no longer works). I
can connect
I apologize if this is in HTML; Outlook express is all I have @ the
moment.
I've been working on this for a few hours now... I need some help! I
can get neither eth0 nor my localhost (lo) interfaces to work! They were
working fine earlier.I made a simple change to my filesystem - I needed
Eric G . Miller egm2@jps.net wrote on 01/01/2001 (21:02) :
This would contradict the man page for host.conf which explicitly says
the arguments must be separated by commas. I tried it both ways and
found no difference for either local or remote lookups. However, I'm
not sure if
, the machine still tries to talk to the
nameservers I have set up in resolv.conf when I write :
netscape http://localhost/
and it then hangs for a long time as it cannot connect to the
nameservers.
If I write netscape http://127.0.0.1/ it works.
# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 02:51:48PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
/etc/host.conf ???
order hosts,bind
multi on
It turns out that /etc/host.conf with
order hosts bind
multi on
works.
NOTICE that there is no comma (or punctuation) between hosts and bind.
Otherwise it won't work.
Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30/12/2000 (21:57) :
Apparently I did something else as well as it stopped working :-(
That is when I'm not on the net, the machine still tries to talk to the
nameservers I have set up in resolv.conf when I write :
netscape http://localhost
in resolv.conf when I write :
netscape http://localhost/
and it then hangs for a long time as it cannot connect to the
nameservers.
If I write netscape http://127.0.0.1/ it works.
# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver
, the machine still tries to talk to the
nameservers I have set up in resolv.conf when I write :
netscape http://localhost/
and it then hangs for a long time as it cannot connect to the
nameservers.
If I write netscape http://127.0.0.1/ it works.
# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1
Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/12/2000 (01:44) :
and nsswitch.conf :
% cat nsswitch.conf
# /etc/nsswitch.conf
#
# Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality.
# If you have the `glibc-doc' and `info' packages installed, try:
# `info libc Name Service Switch' for
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:17AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
I get ssh: localhost: Temporary failure in name
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:17AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I get ssh: localhost: Temporary failure in name resolution with
ssh_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
ssh-askpass-gnome_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
but I can ping
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:17AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I get ssh: localhost: Temporary failure in name resolution with
ssh_1%3a2.2.0p1
I get ssh: localhost: Temporary failure in name resolution with
ssh_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
ssh-askpass-gnome_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
but I can ping localhost, and I can still access other machines with
ssh. Any ideas? I've just upgraded from potato and its ssh.
Andre
on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:17AM +0100, Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I get ssh: localhost: Temporary failure in name resolution with
ssh_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
ssh-askpass-gnome_1%3a2.2.0p1-1.1progeny1_i386.deb
but I can ping localhost, and I can still access other
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:07:46PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Alson writes:
Never noticed, my direct-dilivered mail is always accepted
Do you have a dynamic IP?
Yup, and hostname like i0554.pvu.euronet.nl, possibly not recongized
by other host as dynamic IP, they can't really see the
Alson writes:
...they can't really see the difference between static and dynamic
ips,...
There are blocks of IP's that are known to be used only for dialups. There
isn't a formal standard or anything for this, so it may be that the people
that publish the blacklists haven't noticed that the
Alson van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:07:46PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Alson writes:
my direct-dilivered mail is always accepted
Do you have a dynamic IP?
Yup, and hostname like i0554.pvu.euronet.nl, possibly not recongized
by other host as dynamic IP,
garyjones writes:
Some people seem to think that because most U*E comes out of dynamic IPs,
most dynamic IPs are sources of U*E, and therefore block attempts to
deliver to them directly from such an IP.
Well, that does block many potential spam sources, and shouldn't
inconvenience the account
or 2, IIRC.
he's on dialup so it's option 2.
On 01-Dec-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed Exim, how can I configure it to send mail from localhost? I
don't want
to relay my mail to my ISP, or anyone... Anyone have any idea's? Any help is
greatly
appreciated!
Thank you
PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed Exim, how can I configure it to send mail from
localhost? I
don't want
to relay my mail to my ISP, or anyone... Anyone have any idea's? Any help
is
greatly
appreciated!
Thank you in advance.
Jason
Alson
Alson writes:
you can do direct delivery when on dial-up too, no need for smarthost.
Except that many hosts will notice that you are on a dialup and refuse your
connection.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:22:52PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Alson writes:
you can do direct delivery when on dial-up too, no need for smarthost.
Except that many hosts will notice that you are on a dialup and refuse your
connection.
Never noticed, my direct-dilivered mail is always
Alson writes:
Never noticed, my direct-dilivered mail is always accepted
Do you have a dynamic IP?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
How do I tell inetd/tcpd to not log things like:
Dec 3 16:59:07 localhost ssh[17364]: connect from 127.0.0.1
-chris
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:20:03PM +0100 or thereabouts, Jason C. Hammons
horton@altern.org wrote:
I'd like to be able to send mail from my localhost, is this possible? I don't
want to relay it to my ISP or anything like that, is it possible to have
localhost relay e-mail? Please tell me so
I just installed Exim, how can I configure it to send mail from localhost? I
don't want
to relay my mail to my ISP, or anyone... Anyone have any idea's? Any help is
greatly
appreciated!
Thank you in advance.
Jason
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:22:46PM +0100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just installed Exim, how can I configure it to send mail from localhost? I
don't want
to relay my mail to my ISP, or anyone... Anyone have any idea's? Any help is
greatly
appreciated!
only send
How do I do this? I installed it, and then started it... I went to send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (an old shell), and it never got there... hmm, I'm confused.
2000-12-01 00:54:43 141lt0-0001Z0-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=remote_smtp defer
(110): Connection timed out
After looking over some more
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:48:08PM +0100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do I do this? I installed it, and then started it... I went to send mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (an old shell), and it never got there... hmm, I'm
confused.
2000-12-01 00:54:43 141lt0-0001Z0-00 == [EMAIL
I configure it to send mail from localhost? I
don't want
to relay my mail to my ISP, or anyone... Anyone have any idea's? Any help is
greatly
appreciated!
Thank you in advance.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I'd like to be able to send mail from my localhost, is this possible? I don't
want to relay it to my ISP or anything like that, is it possible to have
localhost relay e-mail? Please tell me so... =) Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Jason
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:17:34PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not found
and w3m's: Can't load http://localhost;.
Does
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 07:55:52PM +, Paul Sims wrote:
have you defined a global http proxy (squid or wwwoffle, for instance) - I
have had some funnies with this. Check the result of export.
No I have never installed squid and do not find any reference to
wwwoffle (which I also removed
==
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Johann Spies wrote:
No, http://localhost/ does also not work. In the mean time I got
links to work (removing a proxy specification in its configuration)
but removing all w3m configuration did not help.
httpd.conf:
ServerName
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:58:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:58:45PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost
:: Andre Berger writes:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not found
and w3m's: Can't load http://localhost;.
Exactly the same as here.
See a thread some
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:46, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
:: Andre Berger writes:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not
found
and w3m's: Can't
:: Pann McCuaig writes:
telnet localhost 80
This is what I get here:
telnet: could not resolve localhost/80: Temporary failure in name resolution
Sounds like it may be a name resolution problem. Here's my experience:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet localhost 80
Trying 127.0.0.1
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:46:05AM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
Exactly the same as here.
See a thread some time ago on telnet not finding localhost... We founf
no solution to the problem at that time.
Try:
telnet localhost 80
This is what I get here:
telnet: could
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:06:54AM +0100, Andre Berger wrote:
Can you 'ping localhost' successfully? Else look at
/etc/network/interfaces, the loopback interface must be active
(uncommented).
Yes, I can 'ping localhost' successfully and the only active line in
/etc/network/interfaces seems
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not found
and w3m's: Can't load http://localhost;.
Does this have something to do with apache's configuration?
JOHANN
--
J.H
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not found
and w3m's: Can't load http://localhost;.
Does this have something to do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have apache installed and lynx, netscape and mozilla do not have a
problem to load http://localhost.
However, links and w3m fails. Links' error message is: Host not found
and w3m's: Can't load http://localhost
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:-
socrates tmp$ telnet localhost 80
telnet: could not resolve localhost/80: Temporary failure in name resolution
FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
connected
:: Neil Booth writes:
FWIW I have exactly the same problem. Just started recently. I have
a dial-up connection too. The problem only exists when I'm not
connected to the internet. As soon as pppd is up, the problem
vanishes, and it reappears when I disconnect.
I haven't a clue either.
and on potato before.
I tried something on /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/host.conf but with no
effect.
There is no network traffic if I try to telnet or ssh with the host's
name. But ping localhost works!
Kai.
--
+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/~bond/
with the host's
name. But ping localhost works!
Yes, ping localhost works here too.
I there anything else we could try to do before filing a bug?
BTW, against which package should we file the bug? telnet?
J.
--
Jeronimo Pellegrini
Institute of Computing - Unicamp - Brazil
http://www.ic.unicamp.br
Subject: telnet doesn't find localhost
Date: Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 10:45:11PM -0200
In reply to:Jeronimo Pellegrini
Quoting Jeronimo Pellegrini([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed
:: Wayne Topa writes:
Thanks for replying, Wayne.
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
Just tried to telnet to localhost and it works fine (potato).
Oh, I'm using woody
this problem and I am using Woody.
Is localhost in your /etc/hosts ?
--
Andrew
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
--snip--
I am a bit confused. man 5 hosts didn't help...
Any ideas?
Do you have an alias for localhost
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 03:20:47AM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
iface lo inet loopback
It was commented out, I enebled it, and still that didn't work.
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net
:: Michael P Soulier writes:
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hm, I did
socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask
:: Christoph Simon writes:
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
Do you have an alias for localhost, something like
127.0.0.1 localhost
I remember having had a similar problema (long time ago), and since
then I always give a local address to ``mybox.mynet'', which is
different from 127.0.0.1
What do you mean? How did you do that? (Or, where can I find some more
info about it?)
127.0.0.1 localhost
:: Michael P Soulier writes:
I have a /etc/init.d/network script on my potato box with these
commands:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hm, I did
socrates:/home/jeronimo# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
socrates:/home/jeronimo# route add -net 127.0.0.0
Hello...
This is probably a known problem. I checked the BTS some time ago,
and tehre was a bug filed against telnet, I guess... It couldn't
resolve localhost.
Anyway... I still have that problem, and the telnet package was
upgraded (and there wasnt anything in the changelog), so I
Hi,
This is off topic but I'm not being able to solve it
by my self, so I'm asking for help here!
Do you know how can I force apache (I believe is it) to
send cookies for localhost domains?
The scenario is the following: I have installed apache
on my home machine, where
The original message was received at Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:20:27 +0200
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Transcript of session follows -
554 Too many hops 26 (25 max): from debian-user@lists.debian.org via
Hello, all:
On one of my machines, which I call lear, I am running
Apache with the Jserv module. The Jserv module works by accepting
requests on port 8007 on localhost. And it works -- sometimes.
This machine is connected via a hub to another Linux box
(called router) acting
% [Connecting to localhost] [Connecting to localhost]
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ apt-get update
Err http://http.us.debian.org stable/main Packages
Could not create a socket - socket (93 Protocol not supported)
...on a pair of potato boxes
Could you
I've got this problem with two boxes I'm maintaining, both currently
slink.
When attempting to run any apt-* commands (eg: apt-get update), I first
get a status line reading:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ apt-get update
0% [Connecting to localhost] [Connecting to localhost
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I've got this problem with two boxes I'm maintaining, both currently
slink.
potato is now the new stable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ apt-get update
0% [Connecting to localhost] [Connecting to localhost]
Could
to the 2.2 release.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ apt-get update
0% [Connecting to localhost] [Connecting to localhost]
Could you show us your /etc/apt/sources.list file?
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 07:04:10AM -0400, Valdemir Melechco Carvalho wrote:
Even if I restart dictd, it still doesn't work - it dies quickly, really
weird. It seens to be a dictd problem, I've already tried slink, potato
and woody dictd versions but it's all the same...
Check your
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 11:44:03AM +0200, Valdemir Melechco Carvalho wrote:
When I look for the process repeatedly, I get something like this:
bash-2.01# ps ax | grep dictd
bash-2.01# ps ax | grep dictd
504 ? S0:00 grep dictd
bash-2.01# ps ax | grep dictd
bash-2.01# ps ax |
901 - 1000 of 1065 matches
Mail list logo
