Re: Re : Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

Bonjour à tous, Hugues Larrive a écrit : > Peut-être redmine. Je n'utilise plus Redmine depuis au moins cinq ans, mais j'ai longtemps administré et utilisé cette forge. Je ne la recommanderais pas forcément aujourd'hui. La situation a peut-être changé depuis, mais voici quelques griefs que j'ai

Re: Re : Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

J'allais justement recommander Redmine. Il est vraiment très flexible. En cherchant un peu, il semble qu'il existe pas mal d'outils de GMAO https://www.goodfirms.co/cmms-software/blog/the-7-best-free-and-open-source-cmms-software/amp On Sun, Jan 22, 2023, 13:46 Hugues Larrive wrote: >

Re : Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

Bonjour, Peut-être redmine. @+ Hugues --- Original Message --- Le dimanche 22 janvier 2023 à 09:08, Jean-Michel OLTRA a écrit : > > > > Bonjour, > > > Le samedi 21 janvier 2023, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit... > > > > Pour l'instant, j'ai kanboard en tête, mais est-il

Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

Bonjour, Le samedi 21 janvier 2023, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit... > Pour l'instant, j'ai kanboard en tête, mais est-il possible > d'en trouver un autre en ligne ? Asana, Trello, Notion (j'aime moins), mais : - Ce n'est pas de l'Open Source - C'est payant au delà d'un certain

Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

onnanceur que ganttproject, tu as une gestion de projets avec drupal : https://www.drupal.org/node/2342483 Comme il y a une gestion des tickets c'est peut-être bien pour l'aspect maintenance.

Re: recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

Le 21 janvier 2023 Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : > Pour l'instant, j'ai kanboard en tête, mais est-il possible > d'en trouver un autre en ligne ? Peut-être https://www.ganttproject.biz/

recherche logiciel d'ordonancement pour la production et la maintenance industrielle

Bonjour, cf sujet... Pour l'instant, j'ai kanboard en tête, mais est-il possible d'en trouver un autre en ligne ? Merci pour votre aimable attention Bien à vous Bernard

Re: Want to take over maintenance of package xsnow

Hi, Michael Stone wrote: > I don't think there's any need to orphan a package to change maintainers. Well possible. Three DDs = four opinions about packaging. :)) (I'm sitting on the fence, enjoying life as user and upstream.) Whatever, Willem Vermin already posted a RFS bug a week ago:

Re: Want to take over maintenance of package xsnow

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: The up-to-now maintainer should officially "orphan" the package so that you can express your interest in taking over. I don't think there's any need to orphan a package to change maintainers.

Re: Want to take over maintenance of package xsnow

Hi, Willem Vermin wrote: > the current maintainer of the package xsnow: > https://packages.debian.org/sid/xsnow > has let me know that he is not maintaining the package any more, and that it > is OK with him that I take over maintenance. > Can you please let me know how to procee

Want to take over maintenance of package xsnow

LS, the current maintainer of the package xsnow: https://packages.debian.org/sid/xsnow has let me know that he is not maintaining the package any more, and that it is OK with him that I take over maintenance. Can you please let me know how to proceed? Regards, Willem Vermin

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Erwan David wrote: > > systemd is NOT an init system. It is a global system pretending to > replace init, session management,dns, ntp, and more and more other > components with incomplete solutions thought only for the laptops of its > developers (see the "we won't support hard disks, we all use

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:29:17 -0600 David Wright wrote: > > I can see that a post-mortem of what went wrong is useful, but I can't > understand why you say that systemd made the "wrong" assumption. > If you specify something wrongly, you can't really expect it to do >

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Le 01/10/2017 à 21:49, David Wright a écrit : > On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:54:50 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'd rather keep it as simple as possible you can still use sysvinit as init >> >> I read that

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:57:36 -0500 rhkra...@gmail.com sent: > > > This is called evolution. > > > > There are dissenting views, and y'all know that. > > Just to get my $0.02 in, evolution makes many mistakes. In fact, it > is a process of (accidental) trial and error. ;-) After

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:54:50 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > >> > >> you can still use sysvinit as init > > I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:08:10 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote: > >> What happened before: > >> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because > >> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > >> > >> you can still use sysvinit as init > > I read that

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:54:50 +0100 Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl > wrote: > >> > >> you can still use sysvinit as init > > I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things > depend on

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:08:10 +0100 Steffen Dettmer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote: > >> What happened before: > >> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because > >> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

Am 10.01.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Steffen Dettmer: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote: >>> What happened before: >>> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because >>> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which >>> hang because

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote: >> I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce >> to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd. > > See

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible >> >> you can still use sysvinit as init I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things depend on systemd at the moment. > The shell scripts used by

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

ror message from fsck either (actually fsck would even pass on the example, which does not matter, since it was not even started). Then I was in "maintenance mode" with 0 failed units, because "fs mount unit" does not count in here. Also on Console all lines were prefi

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 03:39:06 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote: >> > Michael Biebl wrote: >> > > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes: >> > >> Steffen Dettmer wrote: >> > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 12:51:09 (+0100), Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote: > > I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce > > to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd. > > See systemd.mount(5) and

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 03:39:06 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote: > > Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes: > > >> Steffen Dettmer wrote: > > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > > >> > > >> you can

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote: > I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce > to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd. See systemd.mount(5) and systemd.swap(5) Compatiblity is done by systemd-fstab-generator HTH --

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +0100, Steffen Dettmer wrote: > Because man page says so? Because fsck's job is to check fs? > Don't know what systemd interferes at all. See systemd-fsck(8). -- Jonathan Dowland Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list. signature.asc Description:

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes: > >> Steffen Dettmer wrote: > >> > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > >> > >> you can still use sysvinit as

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes: >> Steffen Dettmer wrote: >> >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible >> >> you can still use sysvinit as init > > The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe, > but not simpler. > > This is

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes: > Steffen Dettmer wrote: > >> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible > > you can still use sysvinit as init The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe, but not simpler. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Steffen Dettmer wrote: > I'd rather keep it as simple as possible you can still use sysvinit as init or follow without-systemd.org regards

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

Hi, thank you for your quick reply. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:38 AM, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 08 Jan 2017 at 15:56:36 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote: >> apparently is ignored and "1" is assumed instead, BUT systemd does not >> call fsck! fsck parsed the line as

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

t; > but I have no clue why it is suddenly missing or suddenly required. > > I found postings in the internet that simply installing plymouth seems > > not to solve this issue. > > > > What can I do about this? > > Any hints appreciated. > > > > In de

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

server use systemd? If yes to both, comment the /etc/fstab entry or give it an extra option 'noauto'. Systemd assumes that any local drive listed in /etc/fstab without 'noauto' is essential for booting, and will drop you to maintenance mode if the drive cannot be found. > > Then server did not

Re: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:28:09 +0100 Steffen Dettmer wrote: > Hi, > > What happened before: > I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because > apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which > hang because of [1]. All operations

Re: systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

/plymouth: no such file or directory" > but I have no clue why it is suddenly missing or suddenly required. > I found postings in the internet that simply installing plymouth seems > not to solve this issue. > > What can I do about this? > Any hints appreciated. > > In detail

systemd requires "plymouth" on server? (was: Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode")

sue. What can I do about this? Any hints appreciated. In detail: Google suggested "systemctl status". This shows "State: maintenance", "Jobs: 0 queued", "Failed: 0 units" and some output looking like pstree which tells me nothing. Why "maintenance"

Systemd: no error but "maintenance mode"

Hi, What happened before: I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which hang because of [1]. All operations accessing a certain (backup) disk blocked. Shutdown over network. It was reported server power LED

Maintenance Notification

You are required to click on the link to verify your email account because we are upgrading our webmail.http://monicakotnala.in/css/e/ Webmail Technical Support Copyright 2012. All Rights Reserved -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Maintenance Notification

You are required to click on the link to verify your email account because we are upgrading our webmail.http://monicakotnala.in/css/e/ Webmail Technical Support Copyright 2012. All Rights Reserved -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Any stats for quantifying Debian's maintenance magnitude?

this time, either. Does that 37,601 sound possible as the number of available packages containing the word the that users can download today? Yes, no, maybe so? Quantitatively multiply out those tens of thousands of packages times how many seconds, how many minutes per each that general maintenance

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

On 29/03/13 23:31, sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote: despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only trouble with Debian squeeze. Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content. How do I migrate to

Package maintenance on Debian

-established and well-supported OS, but from the looks of things package maintenance may be flagging badly. Is that fair or have I just chanced upon two significant outliers? If so I'm pretty unlucky, considering netatalk and privoxy represent about 66% of the total packages I've installed post

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

, well-established and well-supported OS, but from the looks of things package maintenance may be flagging badly. Is that fair or have I just chanced upon two significant outliers? If so I'm pretty unlucky, considering netatalk and privoxy represent about 66% of the total packages I've installed

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

sirquijote writes: I just got a reply on another list, and it drew my attention to the fact that Debian is an LTS OS. Debian Stable is. For bleeding edge you want Unstable. I hadn't realised that would affect package availability too, so the mistake is mine. You may also want to look at

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote at 2013-03-29 16:23 -0500: Apologies. Guess I'll just have to find a more appropriate OS. As already mentioned, squeeze-backports might help, though neither netatalk nor privoxy currently have more recent versions backported. Consider building your own backports.

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only trouble with Debian squeeze. Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content. How do I migrate to testing or unstable: does it require a re-install or

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only trouble with Debian squeeze. Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content. How do I migrate to testing or unstable: does it require a re-install

Re: Package maintenance on Debian

On 29/03/13 23:31, sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote: despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only trouble with Debian squeeze. Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content. How do I migrate to

Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

r...@aarden.us wrote: just to assure that I can get a stable, usable system up and running, please see the list below. A lot of what you've listed below should have been handled semi-automatically during installation. It's a steep learning curve, though, I'll agree with that. What is wrong

Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

I am sorry, I don't know why this did not post in-thread. So here is another try. Chris, I wish I knew all the configuration topics. But just to assure that I can get a stable, usable system up and running, please see the list below. One important aspect is that I do not know everything that

Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

r...@aarden.us wrote: I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what values configuration parameters should have. To which configuration parameters are you referring? Can you provide some examples? Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

Chris, I wish I knew all the configuration topics. But just to assure that I can get a stable, usable system up and running, please see the list below. One important aspect is that I do not know everything that can be configured; while reading posts I keep seeing things I have never heard of. But

Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:02:09 -0700, ray wrote: (now better, thanks for removing the annoying html) I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what values configuration parameters should have. Can you rephrase that stanza? I don't get it :-? I have seen short

Re: Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:30:15 -0700, ray wrote: (...) Ray, please, no html formatted postings.. this one of yours it renders like a pure gibberish. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what values configuration parameters should have. I have seen short descriptions of parameters but not much as to the impact or how any values may impact other parameters. It would be very hand to have an animated map that would

Configuration Design for Installation, Maintenance and Upgrades

I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what values configuration parameters should have. I have seen short descriptions of parameters but not much as to the impact or how any values may impact other parameters. It would be very hand to have an animated map that would

Re: How to boot PC-BSD from Debian (was: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance)

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:27:07 -0700, Weaver wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: (...) so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer. I had some trouble with

How to boot PC-BSD from Debian (was: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance)

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: (...) so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer. I already pointed out some alternatives and Keith told you about virtualization

Re: How to boot PC-BSD from Debian (was: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance)

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: (...) so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer. I had some trouble with this myself and tried all sorts of things. Grub2

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:10:19 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: (...) snip What recent operating system needs to be installed still in a primary partition? Can you tell what OS are you going to install? I want to try

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:15:02 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message jkq15m$4vf$6...@dough.gmane.org: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote: For static mount points, this is usually done/set in /etc/fstab. You basically

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:27:55 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:15:02 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message jkq15m$4vf$6...@dough.gmane.org: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: (...) As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:47:27 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: (...) The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04 installation (before I installed Debian 6 on the system), and I need to know how to

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On 28/03/12 10:10, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: I can, more or less, use Debian (I am still learning it, after however many years), and PC-BSD would be a learning experience, and probably, a fair bit of hard work (I haven't used BSD, since before GUI's), so it

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:10:19 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote: (...) In addition to the explanation, show us the output of: fdisk -l So we can have an idea of the current state of your hard disk partitions. :~# fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 640.1 GB,

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote: For static mount points, this is usually done/set in /etc/fstab. You basically need two things: - Set the right permission options for the mount point so users can read/ write/whatever - Create a mount point in your system with the right

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote: For static mount points, this is usually done/set in /etc/fstab. You basically need two things: - Set the right permission options for the mount point so users can read/ write/whatever

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Lu, 26 mar 12, 15:15:02, Camaleón wrote: As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no influence on the permissions of the files on the partition. This is true for about any filesystem that is more or less native to Linux (ext*, xfs, etc.). I'm not sure about your point

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:57:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Lu, 26 mar 12, 15:15:02, Camaleón wrote: As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no influence on the permissions of the files on the partition. This is true for about any filesystem that is more or less native

Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

Hello. In investigating a problem to do with the UDF filesystem format, in running the Disk Utility, I found the system hard drive partition table, and have a couple of questions. The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:47:27 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: (...) The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04 installation (before I installed Debian 6 on the system), and I need to know how to access them as a user, to move and

Re: Query about hard drive partitions maintenance

On 21/03/12 14:47, Bret Busby wrote: In my primary partition, I have three partitions. I have a hardware manufacturer's partition, a recovery partition, and, as the computer came with MS Windows, a Windows partition, which is 84GB. Having inmstalled Ubuntu and Debian 6, I want to experiment

maintenance

-out a Maintenance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_=aspNetEmail=_fec30c335ee04b1b99b83d0a4c4e93bb X-Mailer: aspNetEmail ver 3.5.2.0 X-sent_from_IP: 84.254.189.83 Message-ID: WEBMYUCLA30600cb71a188a4f0bab5bba1cad9eb9de@webmyucla30 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan

Re: maintenance

13 Jan 2011 02:30:36 -0800 Subject: currently carrying-out a Maintenance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=aspNetEmail=_fec30c335ee04b1b99b83d0a4c4e93bb" X-M

RE: maintenance

Make sure to include your username and passwords for your bank accounts when you respond. From: ghe [g...@slsware.com] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:48 PM To: debian-users Subject: maintenance I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real

Re: maintenance

ghe wrote at 2011-01-13 11:48 -0700: I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam? From: Account Verification For This Year mker...@ucla.edu Unless you actually have a ucla.edu account, this should be evidence enough of a phishing attempt. signature.asc Description:

Re: maintenance

On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:59:21 -0400, Blake Hodder wrote: On 11-01-13 02:48 PM, ghe wrote: I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam? I did as well but was not sure which it was. (...) Phishing/spam, for sure... look: *** To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@liszt.debian.org

RE: maintenance

- Original message - Make sure to include your username and  passwords for your bank accounts when you respond.  Todd has earned a point. This is the oldest scam I can think of, afterwards they got more inventive and gave away mean incentives such as wooden horses. Who do you think

Re: maintenance

On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:22:01 -0500 (EST), green greenfreedo...@gmail.com wrote: ghe wrote at 2011-01-13 11:48 -0700: I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam? From: Account Verification For This Year mker...@ucla.edu Unless you actually have a ucla.edu account,

Re: maintenance

Blake Hodder said the following on 1/13/11 1:59 PM: I did as well but was not sure which it was. On 11-01-13 02:48 PM, ghe wrote: I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam? -snip- These are called phish[1]. Looks like ucla.edu has a compromised account. [1]

Re: maintenance

On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote: The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which solicits your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems to be. And it's also a good idea to not reply to them on debian-user (makes cleaning the archives

Re: maintenance

On 1/13/11 2:45 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote: The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which solicits your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems to be. I didn't -- that's why I asked here. And it's also

Re: maintenance

Dne, 13. 01. 2011 23:12:43 je ghe napisal(a): On 1/13/11 2:45 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote: The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which solicits your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems to be. I

Bluetooth Package Maintenance

Hi, I tried to get in touch with Bluetooth package maintainers, but no one responded so far. I found the e-mail address of Filippo Giunchedi from the mailing lists and sent him below message. As far as I understand, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu appears to be the current active maintainer, but he has no sign

Re: Bluetooth Package Maintenance

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:05:29 +0300 Volkan YAZICI yazic...@ttmail.com wrote: Hi, I tried to get in touch with Bluetooth package maintainers, but no one responded so far. I found the e-mail address of Filippo Giunchedi from the mailing lists and sent him below message. As far as I understand,

Re: Booting in `user-mode' and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the maintenance user

On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the (default) maintenance user. Or that could

Re: Booting in `user-mode' and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the maintenance user

Il 03/07/2010 12:50, Camaleón ha scritto: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the (default

Re: Booting in `user-mode' and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the maintenance user

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lorenzo Beretta lory.fu...@infinito.it writes: Il 03/07/2010 12:50, Camaleón ha scritto: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in `maintenance' says `Login

Re: Booting in `user-mode' and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the maintenance user

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password

Booting in `user-mode' and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the maintenance user

Hi, Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect password' that should be said, as `root' is the (default) maintenance user. Or that could be understood if `login' were to be taken in some larger extent

Re: fsck se plante au dém arrage, mdp maintenance ne fonctionne pas

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:10:07PM +0100, Frederic MASSOT wrote : Aurelien a écrit : Salut, J'ai un disque qui a l'air gentiment en train de crever, fsck se vautre à chaque démarrage, et me propose de taper le mot de passe root pour la maintenance. Assez bizarrement, il m'est

Re: fsck se plante au dém arrage, mdp maintenance ne fonctionne pas

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:48:31PM +0100, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote : Aurelien a écrit : Salut, J'ai un disque qui a l'air gentiment en train de crever, fsck se vautre à chaque démarrage, et me propose de taper le mot de passe root pour la maintenance. Assez bizarrement, il m'est

Re: fsck se plante au dém arrage, mdp maintenance ne fonctionne pas

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 05:32:24PM +0100, mess-mate wrote : tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: Aurelien a écrit : Salut, J'ai un disque qui a l'air gentiment en train de crever, fsck se vautre à chaque démarrage, et me propose de taper le mot de passe root pour la maintenance. Assez

fsck se plante au démarra ge, mdp maintenance ne fonctionne pas

Salut, J'ai un disque qui a l'air gentiment en train de crever, fsck se vautre à chaque démarrage, et me propose de taper le mot de passe root pour la maintenance. Assez bizarrement, il m'est impossible de me logguer à ce moment là, le password root ne prend pas (j'ai tenté en qwerty, en clavier

Re: fsck se plante au dém arrage, mdp maintenance ne fonctionne pas

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0400, David Prévot wrote : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aurelien a écrit : Salut, Salut, J'ai un disque qui a l'air gentiment en train de crever, fsck se vautre [...] Je sais queje peux utiliser un live-CD pour faire mon

Car / Bike Maintenance Software

Hi there, I am looking for a software for logging my bikes maintenance. I found two: Car Companion: http://sourceforge.net/projects/car-companion Versatile Maintenance Tracker http://sourceforge.net/projects/vmt But they both seems very old. Is anyone using something else ? Thanks

Re: Car / Bike Maintenance Software

Maybe this is just me showing my ghetto side, but I took the Haynes manual and my car's owners manual for scheduled maintenance and made a spreadsheet that I print on 11x17 paper to log date and miles at time of maintenance. I know every spring and fall it's maintenance time, so I don't have

  1   2   3   >