On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:31:24PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >>I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be
> >>secure), but there are a few packages that I want from testing or
> >>unstable. How to do this?
Hi Dave,
from those at debian-on-high, it is recommended to fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:31:24PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote:
> IIUC, that messages describes how to install binary packages. In fact,
> the whole thread seemed to focus on that. The Debian Reference (section
> 6.4.10) suggests that it's bett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:12:32PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote:
> I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be secure),
> but there are a few packages that I want from testing or unstable. How to
> do this?
Short answer: You
On Monday 26 January 2004 09:31 pm, David Rothenberger wrote:
> The Debian Reference (section 6.4.10) suggests that it's better to
> compile from source packages, so you don't end up upgrading libc, for
> example. Is this really true?
Upgrading libc on stable with libc on testing could easily bre
I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be
secure), but there are a few packages that I want from testing or
unstable. How to do this?
This message from the recent archives should be helpful:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200401/msg06198.html
IIUC, th
On Monday 26 January 2004 09:12 pm, David Rothenberger wrote:
> I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be
> secure), but there are a few packages that I want from testing or
> unstable. How to do this?
This message from the recent archives should be helpful:
http://lists.de
I'm new to Debian. I'm replacing an old RH firewall/router/server with Woody.
I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be secure),
but there are a few packages that I want from testing or unstable. How to
do this?
I've read that the safest way to go is to get the sources f
* Louie Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030926 09:06]:
> Is it possible to mix stable and testing deb packages?.
Theoreticaly yes, practicaly maybe. Many packages from testing depend
on packages, which don't exist in stable, or on newer ones, so updating
some components to testing may lead you very
Is it possible to mix stable and testing deb packages?.
I mean, ex: I have libc6 2.2.5-11.5 and i want to make it libc6 2.3.1-1
This happend to me when i downloaded mod_security.c
http://packages.debian.org/testing/web/libapache-mod-security.html
And installed it using dpkg -i libapache-mod-secu
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:28:57AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
>
> # dpkg --force-remove-essential --force-remove-reinstreq --force-depends
> -r syslog-ng
> # dpkg -i metalog_0.7beta-3_i386.deb
>
> use force options with extreme care, but they are occasionally
> useful...(Only one of the force o
Vikki Roemer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:14:02PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
In same directory:
dpkg-source -x metalog_0.7beta-3.dsc
cd metalog_0.7beta
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot
cd ..
dpkg -i metalog_0.7beta-3_i386.deb
Ok, I did all that, but when I try to run dpkg -i, I get the
Vikki Roemer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:14:02PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
In same directory:
dpkg-source -x metalog_0.7beta-3.dsc
cd metalog_0.7beta
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot
cd ..
dpkg -i metalog_0.7beta-3_i386.deb
Ok, I did all that, but when I try to run dpkg -i, I get the f
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:14:02PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
>
> In same directory:
>
> dpkg-source -x metalog_0.7beta-3.dsc
> cd metalog_0.7beta
> dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot
> cd ..
> dpkg -i metalog_0.7beta-3_i386.deb
Ok, I did all that, but when I try to run dpkg -i, I get the foll
Vikki Roemer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:36PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
You would need to setup a /etc/apt/preferences file, add testing to yor
sources.list, and use pinning. Even so libc6 (upgrade) will be a depend
on anythig from Testing. For what you want, it may be safer/easier to
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:36:21PM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:36PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
> > You would need to setup a /etc/apt/preferences file, add testing to
> > yor sources.list, and use pinning. Even so libc6 (upgrade) will be a
> > depend on anythig from Te
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:36PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
>
> You would need to setup a /etc/apt/preferences file, add testing to yor
> sources.list, and use pinning. Even so libc6 (upgrade) will be a depend
> on anythig from Testing. For what you want, it may be safer/easier to
> use 'apt-s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 01 September 2003 04:03 pm, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> Hi
> I was wondering if it's possible to run a few testing apps on a
> (otherwise) stable system. See, I'm running a server so I don't want
> to run testing, per se, but I want metalog and te
Hi
I was wondering if it's possible to run a few testing apps on a (otherwise)
stable system. See, I'm running a server so I don't want to run testing,
per se, but I want metalog and testing's gnupg (I'm having problems with
stable's gnupg and my keyring, so I'm hoping going back to testing's gnup
18 matches
Mail list logo