Celejar wrote:
It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
What are the aptitude equivalents of
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
apt-get source grep
, and in my experience, Synaptic's
GUI doesn't add much value, and you can use aptitude in interactive
mode.
I like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Celejar wrote:
It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
What are the aptitude equivalents of
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
apt-get source grep
Good question.
, and in my experience,
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:28:26 +0200
Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atis wrote:
You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
as dependencies so it
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is this
true for synaptic and aptitude as well? Can
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Celejar wrote:
It's more powerful and can do anything that apt-get can
What are the aptitude equivalents of
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
Interesting point. Google found this:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like synaptic's GUI much better than aptitude's ncurses interface. If I
want to see all the packages whose names start with vim, In synaptic all I
Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:20:12 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like synaptic's GUI much better than aptitude's ncurses interface. If
I want to see all the packages whose names start
Chris Lale wrote:
There was a long discussion about this, as you recall. The results are
summarised on the NewbieDOC wiki [1]. Basically, you run
# aptitude install -sf
to see whether Aptitude is confused. If so, run a fix. The global fix is
# aptitude keep-all
[1]
Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is this
true for synaptic and aptitude as well? Can I use synaptic sometimes and
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get
and aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude
another time. The reason given was that both of them use different
databases. Is this true for synaptic and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Sometime before, I read on this list that it is unwise to mix apt-get and
aptitude. By mix, I mean using apt-get one time and aptitude another time.
The reason given was that both of them use different databases. Is
You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
as dependencies so it can remove them when you remove a package (so long
as no other package is using them). If you pull things in with any
other package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atis wrote:
You can use both, but you will confuse aptitude in the process.
Aptitude keeps a database so that it knows which packages it pulled in
as dependencies so it can remove them when you remove a package (so long
as no other package is
13 matches
Mail list logo
