Re: mount -r -t iso9660...->fs not supp by kernal (fwd)

1998-12-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Eric Drayer wrote: > > currently the sugestion is to say yes to _NLS but there might be another > fs that has somthing to do??? with iso9660. That's appropriate. Afaik you'll need at least one NLS and one KEYMAP (sp?) define. > PS should i CON

Re: mount -r -t iso9660...->fs not supp by kernal (fwd)

1998-12-25 Thread Peter Bartosch
Hi! > PS should i CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION y/n > PENTIUM 200 no mmx two chips on the board > GA586 what do you mean with 2 chips? -- multi-processor-board?? then you should trie 2.1.-kernels which provide SMP-support > if you could give me a doc that talks about these options in more detail ker

mount -r -t iso9660...->fs not supp by kernal (fwd)

1998-12-23 Thread Eric Drayer
currently the sugestion is to say yes to _NLS but there might be another fs that has somthing to do??? with iso9660. ORIGINAL message I recompiled my kernal to support two chips. When I went thro