Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-06 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:05:37PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > OK, is there a way to do this in bulk, in a way other than simply > > tagging all messages with a common subject as being threaded replies , > > o

Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-06 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:05:37PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > OK, is there a way to do this in bulk, in a way other than simply > tagging all messages with a common subject as being threaded replies , > one-level deep, of a single initial post? I

Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-05 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:10:54PM -0700, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030905 14:55]: > > on Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:26:14AM -0700, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:32:21AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > >

Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-05 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030905 14:55]: > on Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:26:14AM -0700, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:32:21AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > I'd like suggestions on how I might go about restoring at least > > > pseudo-threading

Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-05 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:26:14AM -0700, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:32:21AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > I'd like suggestions on how I might go about restoring at least > > pseudo-threading of articles, though I'm also posting to the list on > > this

Re: mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:32:21AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'd like suggestions on how I might go about restoring at least > pseudo-threading of articles, though I'm also posting to the list on > this matter. Tag the message you want to attach

mutt: thread reconstruction?

2003-09-04 Thread Karsten M. Self
I'm subscribed to a mailing list in which message-ID and references are being rewritten by an utterly broken mailing list manager (Communigate Pro). This breaks threading badly: http://guildenstern.dyndns.org/~karsten/cni-thread.png http://guildenstern.dyndns.org/~karsten/cni-nothread.png