On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
need to run:
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -i eth0 -j
ACCEPT iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 22 -i eth0
-j ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -N ssh-connection
/sbin/iptables -A ssh-connection -i eth0 -p tcp
On Sun May 3 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Firestarter might work, but i really wanted to be able to add my own
entry to some file somewhere:) command-line junky :)
Sounds like shorewall to me ;)
ahhh, I might have to look at it. thanks!
per the INTRO page:
http://www.shorewall.net/
On Fri,01.May.09, 05:36:06, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do it. I tried
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
#static setup
#auto eth0
#iface eth0 inet static
#address 192.168.10.103
#netmask 255.255.255.0
#broadcast 192.168.10.255
here is what I have now:
Please re-enable this part (and comment out the dhcp parts) and post the
output of 'ifup -v
On Sat,02.May.09, 05:38:38, Paul Cartwright wrote:
well, that seems to work.
...
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no problems) just
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no problems) just blacklist it in a file (ex. 00local.conf)
On Sat,02.May.09, 06:15:04, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sat May 2 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
part of the problem was 2 files I had worked on that did give me
errors, and I removed them. 1 was ipv6,
Do yo mean the module? If you don't want it loaded (though I have it and
there are no
On Sat, 02 May 2009 06:15:04 -0400, Paul Cartwright posted:
[...]
what I want is a rule tht allows http for my web page to port forward from
my router to my desktop, and also allow me to ssh into my desktop from my
laptops.
If I understand correctly what you asking:
You will need to option
On Sat May 2 2009, Thorny wrote:
If I understand correctly what you asking:
You will need to option your router to port forward port 80 requests
from the WAN interface to the static IP Address of the computer on your
LAN you want them to go to.
I have done that and it works.
If those
On Sat,02.May.09, 16:32:44, Paul Cartwright wrote:
Firestarter might work, but i really wanted to be able to add my own
entry to some file somewhere:) command-line junky :)
Sounds like shorewall to me ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do it. I tried
dpkg-reconfigure ifupdown, but that didn't change the interfaces file.
On Fri, 1 May 2009 05:36:06 -0400
Paul Cartwright a...@pcartwright.com wrote:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best way to do
On Fri, 01 May 2009 05:36:06 -0400, Paul Cartwright posted:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian lenny setup from coming up correctly.
This doesn't tell us anything that we could use to troubleshoot. Do you
mean the system doesn't come up or just
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:36:06 -0400, Paul Cartwright (a...@pcartwright.com)
wrote:
I seemed to have a problem with my static setup of eth0 that stopped my
debian
lenny setup from coming up correctly. I kept getting errors in logs.
To redo my network config, just eth0, what is the best
On Fri,01.May.09, 15:11:17, Bob Cox wrote:
What I would expect to see is something a bit like this:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.10.103
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.10.1
network 192.168.10.0
broadcast 192.168.10.255
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 19:04:25 +0300, Andrei Popescu
(andreimpope...@gmail.com) wrote:
[snip]
Nitpick: 'network' and 'broadcast' are optional and gateway is necessary
only if this interface is used to connect to the internet.
Good points. I like nitpicking ;-)
As an aside, I use static
On Fri May 1 2009, Celejar wrote:
this is what I had that didn't work:
#static setup
#auto eth0
#iface eth0 inet static
#address 192.168.10.103
#netmask 255.255.255.0
#broadcast 192.168.10.255
here is what I have now:
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
On Fri May 1 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.10.103
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.10.1
network 192.168.10.0
broadcast 192.168.10.255
Nitpick: 'network' and 'broadcast' are optional and gateway
On Fri May 1 2009, Bob Cox wrote:
What I would expect to see is something a bit like this:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.10.103
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.10.1
network 192.168.10.0
broadcast 192.168.10.255
(assuming you
On Fri May 1 2009, Bob Cox wrote:
Nitpick: 'network' and 'broadcast' are optional and gateway is necessary
only if this interface is used to connect to the internet.
Good points. I like nitpicking ;-)
As an aside, I use static IPs on everything here with no wireless and
all manually
20 matches
Mail list logo
