Re: new kernel release

1999-01-27 Thread Marcel Burggraeve
On 26 Jan 1999 19:28:33 +0100, Jim McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? After compiling and installing the kernel I can't use

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-27 Thread Gilbert Laycock
I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0: a) it was not possible to change the irq for soundblaster to the value=20 most cards use (5, and it defaults to 7? or is it vice versa). You can pass parameters to modules when insmod'ing them, ie insmod sb irq=3D5

new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Jim McCloskey
I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? Thanks for your time, Jim McCloskey

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0: a) it was not possible to change the irq for

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Jim McCloskey wrote: I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? Kernel 2.2.0 depends on certain package

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Rafael Kitover
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 01:19:25PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote: I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? I had a couple, though it was on the last

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0: a) it was not possible to change the irq for soundblaster to the value=20 most cards use (5, and it defaults to 7? or is it vice versa). You can pass parameters to modules when insmod'ing them, ie insmod sb irq=3D5

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Alec Smith
Yeah, it throws up an error with setserial that I have yet to get rid of... Looking at the code, its just to say setserial -W is no longer supported... However I changed that part of 0setserial and still have the error. Anyway, it doesn't appear to be anything too serious. Other than that, 2.2

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Tino Schwarze
Hi Jim, I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released. Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in compiling this kernel for Debian hamm? I compiled it today. But read Documentation/Changes first! I guess, you need some packages from potato, e.g. newer

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Bob Nielsen
I've come across one problem in compiling, which did NOT occur with 2.2.0-pre9: drivers/sound/sound.a(sb_ess.o): In function `ess_init': sb_ess.o(.text+0xde2): undefined reference to `esstype' sb_ess.o(.text+0xe77): undefined reference to `esstype' make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 It compiled

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread Bob Nielsen
I see that Documentation/CHANGES says that net-tools 1.49 is required. It says to use 'hostname -V' to determine the version, but this does not work. 'route -V' in both slink and potato that the net-tools version is 1.45. Is an upgrade needed here? Bob Bob Nielsen

Re: new kernel release

1999-01-26 Thread servis
*- Bob Nielsen wrote about Re: new kernel release I've come across one problem in compiling, which did NOT occur with 2.2.0-pre9: drivers/sound/sound.a(sb_ess.o): In function `ess_init': sb_ess.o(.text+0xde2): undefined reference to `esstype' sb_ess.o(.text+0xe77): undefined reference