seems too restricted for system software, these following
>> commands are removed:
>>
>> sudo (so I can't su to root for apt)
>> ping
>> dig
>> nslookup
>> net-tools
>>
> It is a good practice to build small images for pods without commands for
> th
Greg Wooledge (12023-03-03):
> Dedicated lookup tools:
>
> getent hosts
> host
> dnsqr
It is important to know that host and dnsqr do actual DNS requests, and
therefore ignore local configuration about other means of resolving
hosts, including /etc/hosts.
getent hosts is the dedicated command, t
>
> I have bitnami/mysql container (debian OS) running on kubernetes.
> This container seems too restricted for system software, these following
> commands are removed:
>
> sudo (so I can't su to root for apt)
> ping
> dig
> nslookup
> net-tools
>
It is a g
On 04/03/2023 07:53, Ken Young wrote:
Do you know any other way to resolve a hostname by manual on this
container?
systemd-resolve
However I am unsure concerning k8s containers. Some interpreters:
python3 -c 'import socket as s, sys;
print(s.gethostbyname(sys.argv[1]))' debian.net
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 08:53:39AM +0800, Ken Young wrote:
> ping
> dig
> nslookup
> net-tools
>
> Do you know any other way to resolve a hostname by manual on this
> container?
Dedicated lookup tools:
getent hosts
host
dnsqr
Utilities that resolve hostnames as a side ef
Hello,
I have bitnami/mysql container (debian OS) running on kubernetes.
This container seems too restricted for system software, these following
commands are removed:
sudo (so I can't su to root for apt)
ping
dig
nslookup
net-tools
Do you know any other way to resolve a hostname by manua
On 11/08/10 00:18, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
[pi.shawcable.net] It's your ISP's search domain.
OK, but if a system has an address for a working nameserver,
what is the value or significance of the search domain?
I think it uses this to turn an unqualified name in to a qualified one
so if (in t
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:18:25PM -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> From: Tom H
> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:16:42 -0400
> > Why did you install it[dnsmasq]?
>
> * Local name resolution is more efficient than having
> each local machine query the ISP nameserver.
> * The ISP can change the IP ad
From: Tom H
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:16:42 -0400
> Why did you install it[dnsmasq]?
* Local name resolution is more efficient than having
each local machine query the ISP nameserver.
* The ISP can change the IP address of a nameserver at will.
My dnsmasq system will get a new address by dhcp
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, wrote:
> From: Tom H
> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:39:34 -0400
>
>> A "dig +trace debian.org" should display your upstream dns servers.
>
> That's helpful. I also did "dig +trace google.ca";
> results appended. Appears that dnsmasq referred to
> 192.33.4.12#53
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:19:59AM -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> Jaime,
>
> You put me back on track. Thanks!
>
> From: Jaime Di Cristina
> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:32:13 -0400
> > I use dnsmasq on OpenWrt. There the information of the DNS
> > servers is stored on /tmp/resolv.conf.auto.
Jaime,
You put me back on track. Thanks!
From: Jaime Di Cristina
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:32:13 -0400
> I use dnsmasq on OpenWrt. There the information of the DNS
> servers is stored on /tmp/resolv.conf.auto. I don't know where is the
> equivalent location on a Debian installation of dns
joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcable.net
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find pi.shawcable.net: No answer
I am not sure I fully understand your question. However
dhclient, when it gets given a dhcp address will setup
/etc/resolv.conf to point to th
nameservers?
Here are some things which don't help.
joule:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by
resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search pi.shawcable.net
joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcabl
help.
joule:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by
resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search pi.shawcable.net
joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcable.net
Server: 127.0.0.1
Ad
On 09/08/10 02:48, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
Almost all comments. Exactly as installed if I'm not
mistaken. Certainly no upstream server is specified.
The system must get the ISP addresses by dhcp; but where
are they hidden?
As I explained above, dhclient (which receives them) writes them in
/etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search pi.shawcable.net
joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcable.net
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
me things which don't help.
>
> joule:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> search pi.shawcable.net
> jo
Tom and others,
From: Tom H
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:39:34 -0400
> dnsmasq gets its upstream dns servers from /etc/resolv.conf unless you
> have set it to get them from elsewhere in /etc/dnsmasq.conf.
As in the earlier message.
pe...@joule:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) fi
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:10 PM, wrote:
>
>> # Change this line if you want dns to get its upstream servers from
>> # somewhere other that /etc/resolv.conf
>> #resolv-file=
>
> But I don't want to change anything. I simply want
> to know the nameserver addresses.
I had misunderstood that your dn
Tom,
From: Tom H
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:09:37 -0400
> ... dnsmasq is therefore using 127.0.0.1 as its upstream server, ...
By the way, 127.0.0.1 is the local host, my machine
running dnsmasq. "Upstream" is anything in the outside
world including the ISP.
Regards, ... Peter E.
Tom,
> # Change this line if you want dns to get its upstream servers from
> # somewhere other that /etc/resolv.conf
> #resolv-file=
But I don't want to change anything. I simply want
to know the nameserver addresses.
> ... dnsmasq is therefore using 127.0.0.1 as its upstream server, ...
>Fro
lp.
>
> joule:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
> # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> search pi.shawcable.net
> joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcable.
e for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search pi.shawcable.net
joule:~# nslookup pi.shawcable.net
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can&#
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
> My Domain SMB knowledge is slightly rusty but here goes...
>
> 1. Your Samba server's ip address ends with a 0, which, AFAIK, is
> reserved for network addresses (unless it has some special purpose
> like the the /32 netmask). What is the output of
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Siju George wrote:
>
> I have installed
> ii samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny9 a
> ii samba-common 2:3.2.5-4lenny9
> On Debian Lenny and i am sharing directories to Windows Users successfully.
>
> I configur
/home/samba/netlogon
guest ok = Yes
share modes = No
I can get the domain & domain controller resolved using DNS from the
Windows XP machine.
C:\Documents and Settings\secure>nslookup hifxnx.local
Server: hifxpms.hifxchn2.local
Address: 172.16.2.26
Name:hifxnx.lo
michael wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:49 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> michael wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>>>> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
>>>>>>>> to be working find on my Debian box behind
michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 13:17 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > > On T
fine (and note that both MacOS and XP had worked fine with .42 or .43!):
DEBIAN BOX:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
search
nameserver 158.152.1.58
nameserver 158.152.1.43
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nslookup www.bbc.co.uk
Server: 158.152.1.43
Address:158.152.1.43#53
Non-authoritative answer:
www.bbc.co.uk canonical name = www.bbc.net.uk.
Name: www.bbc.net.uk
Address: 212.58.227.76
Ta, M
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 13:17 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:49 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> michael wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>>> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> >>>>>> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> >
michael wrote:
[...]
>>>>>> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
>>>>>> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
>>>>>> nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to wo
Samuel Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
>> search
>> nameserver 158.152.1.58
>> nameserver 158.152.1.42
>
> In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
> say in English?):
Here marks the spot? :)
I use Demon, the second entry from
ter/modem and things seem to
> be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for nslookup.
> Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note I can still
> access the e-World from my Debian box:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.bbc.co.uk
> PING www.bbc.net.uk
michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
<>
> > I'll investigate. thanks, Michael
47:30 +0100
> > > > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > > > > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> > > > >
> >
> > > > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > > > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> > > > nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note
> > > > I
hings seem
> > > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> > > nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note
> > > I can still access the e-World from my Debian box:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, e
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> nslookup. Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Not
d not work.
For now try to use my configuration:
search foo.ch
nameserver 62.2.24.162
nameserver 62.2.17.60
nameserver 62.2.17.61
I can add that another machine (MacOS) on my LAN does nslookup okay,
indeed with the first mentioned nameserver. Furthermore, my
understanding is that I need a local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
search
nameserver 158.152.1.58
nameserver 158.152.1.42
In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
say in English?):
I entered your nameserver in my resolv.conf and it did not work.
For now try to use my configuration:
search foo.ch
nam
I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem to
be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for nslookup.
Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note I can still
access the e-World from my Debian box:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.bbc.co.uk
> Serena Cantor wrote:
> >how to find out domain name of an IP address?
> >Thanks!
On 24.10.06 08:48, Mike McCarty wrote:
> nslookup
> whois
> dig
sorry, whois is much different from the others. You probably meant "host".
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL P
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 10:53, Serena Cantor wrote:
> how to find out domain name of an IP address?
> Thanks!
I use 'host ip.add.re.ss'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serena Cantor wrote:
how to find out domain name of an IP address?
Thanks!
nslookup
whois
dig
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can&#x
Serena Cantor wrote:
how to find out domain name of an IP address?
Thanks!
nslookup
or
dig -x
Miles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
На Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> записано:
> how to find out domain name of an IP address?
> Thanks!
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.y
how to find out domain name of an IP address?
Thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
2006/4/13, George Borisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> >
> > is this normal?
>
> Yes, if reverse zone has not been configured properly. Try:
>
> nslookup 64.233.183.25
>
> This will work properly.
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
&g
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
>
> is this normal?
Yes, if reverse zone has not been configured properly. Try:
nslookup 64.233.183.25
This will work properly.
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is this normal?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nslookup
> 167.34.4.12
Server: 172.18.4.1
Address:172.18.4.1#53
** server can't find 12.4.34.167.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
it works ok for direct queries
> www.google.com
Server: 172.18.4.1
Address:172.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
> As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> LAN to the real authority for funkypenguin.net?
>
> Give us more info on how you have your domain s
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:10:18PM +, Mark C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just set up bind for my internal network, and running:
>
> 'nslookup funkypenguin.net' returns:
>
> Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Cons
Hi,
I've just set up bind for my internal network, and running:
'nslookup funkypenguin.net' returns:
Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead. Run nslookup with
the `-sil[ent]'
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:10:40PM +0100, JG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> > seem to find nslookup.
> >
> > I've got it on most of
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:36:24AM -0500, stan wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
> moment doesn
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:36:24 -0500
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I
> can't seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building
> at t
I think the preffered command to the nslookup is dig.
It should give you as much functionality, or even more, then nslookup.
Bojan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:47:06AM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, stan wrote:
>
> > I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, stan wrote:
> I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
> seem to find nslookup.
>
> I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
> moment doesn't ha
I tried apt-cache search, and the Debian package search page, and I can't
seem to find nslookup.
I've got it on most of my "testingh" boxes, but the one I'm building at the
moment doesn't have it.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary
* Rob Weir ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030225 15:41]:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:20:55AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> > I had a host, but not this host. It seems nslookup is deprecated in
> > favor of host. Thanks.
>
> In favour of dig, IIRC.
Either one:
doozer:~% nslook
closest I've come is
> >> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
>
> >
> >Its in the "host" package
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
> >host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
>
> I had a h
Rus Foster wrote:
>
> Its in the "host" package
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
> host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
Actually, you probably want bind9-host instead of host. Host is a
replacement for nslookup. But because of an unfortunate
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:56:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:59:02PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > IMO, this is a real shame... I always used host for 1-shot lookups
> > and nslookup for deeper troubleshooting or when I wanted an
> > interacti
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:25:02AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > According to the "search contents of packages" utility at
> > packages.debian.org it's in the dnsutils package in testing (and also
> > zsh, apparently).
>
> You can achieve the same results using
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:59:02PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> IMO, this is a real shame... I always used host for 1-shot lookups
> and nslookup for deeper troubleshooting or when I wanted an
> interactive interface for some other reason.
host(1) does everything that nslookup(1)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:25:02AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> According to the "search contents of packages" utility at
> packages.debian.org it's in the dnsutils package in testing (and also
> zsh, apparently).
You can achieve the same results using apt-file search
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:44:19AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
bind9-host. I think it's in sarge...
Gary Turner wrote:
>I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
>I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
>ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
Many thanks to all who answered. I installed dnsutils (which means I
wasn't total
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:25:19AM -0600, Will Trillich wrote:
> i seem to recall seeing that nslookup is deprecated. we're
> supposed to use dig or zone or dnsquery now. (probably there's a
> good reason, or maybe my other personality just made this all
> up.)
It is d
Gary, you got a lot of advice...
But what I think you want is "dig"
> apt-get install dig
> man dig
> dig -x www.debian.org
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL
Gary> I'd prefer non X.
~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/nslookup
dnsutils: /usr/bin/nslookup
However, it is deprecated. Use dig instead (same package).
Cheers!
Shyamal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
> >
> > Running Sarge.
> > --
> > gt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > If someone tells you---
> > "I have a sense of humor, but that's not funny."
> > ---th
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rus Foster wrote:
> Its in the "host" package
>
> rghf@duocity:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
> host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
Not to my knownledge.
$ apt-cache show host
Package: host
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-S
Hi,
try this :
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents
Murat
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 10:01
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: nslookup --- which package?
I have been unable to locate
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:44:19AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
> I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
> ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
i seem to rec
er non X.
>
>Its in the "host" package
>
>rghf@duocity:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
>host - Utility for Querying DNS Servers
I had a host, but not this host. It seems nslookup is deprecated in
favor of host. Thanks.
--
gt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If some
ng Sarge.
Hi,
I hate it when that happens to me. :)
$ dpkg -S `which nslookup`
dnsutils: /usr/bin/nslookup
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; --
> gt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If someone tells you---
> "I have a sense of humor, but that's not funny."
> ---they don't.
>
>
Its in the "host" package
rghf@duocity:~$ apt-cache search nslookup
host -
I have been unable to locate this utility. The more I look, the sillier
I feel. Wasn't this in some util pkg? The closest I've come is
ptknslookup in the ptknettools pkg. I'd prefer non X.
Running Sarge.
--
gt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If someone tells you---
"I have a sense of humo
"stanb" == stanb writes:
stanb> I've been ignoring the message for a while, but "may be
stanb> removed" part of it caught my eye today.
stanb> Wjy exactly is nslookup being depricated? Is this a Debian
stanb> only thing? My FreeB
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:51:58PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I think this is an isc.org decision. use /usr/bin/host, it provides
> the same functionality with a better interface, IMHO.
Better command-line interface, anyhow. AFAICT, it doesn't have an
interactive interface on par with nsloo
also sprach stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.24.1843 +0200]:
> I've been ignoring the message for a while, but "may be removed" part of it
> caught my eye today.
>
> Wjy exactly is nslookup being depricated? Is this a Debian only thing? My
> FreeBSD machine
I've been ignoring the message for a while, but "may be removed" part of it
caught my eye today.
Wjy exactly is nslookup being depricated? Is this a Debian only thing? My
FreeBSD machines are not complaining.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary sa
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:08:50 -0800 ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 01 February 2002 08:48 am, Xeno Campanoli wrote:
>[snip]
>> >
>> > I can't find "dig" with apt-cache search. I do find something called
>> > "htdig". Is this basically the same t
On Friday 01 February 2002 04:05 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:08:50 -0800 ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 01 February 2002 08:48 am, Xeno Campanoli wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > I can't find "dig" with apt-cache search. I do find something called
> > > "htdig". Is this
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:08:50 -0800 ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2002 08:48 am, Xeno Campanoli wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > I can't find "dig" with apt-cache search. I do find something called
> > "htdig". Is this basically the same thing?
>
> no, not at all the same thing. you'
On Friday 01 February 2002 08:48 am, Xeno Campanoli wrote:
> > > i want to use nslooup
> >
> > You really should use dig or host (use dig). nslookup is deprecated.
> > dig is fairly good to use.
> >
> > Cameron Kerr
>
> I can't find "
Xeno Campanoli wrote:
> I can't find "dig" with apt-cache search. I do find something called
> "htdig". Is this basically the same thing?
very different, you want package: dnsutils
--
+--+
Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network A
> > i want to use nslooup
> You really should use dig or host (use dig). nslookup is deprecated.
> dig is fairly good to use.
>
> Cameron Kerr
I can't find "dig" with apt-cache search. I do find something called
"htdig". Is this basically the
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, wang wrote:
>hello!
> i want to use nslooup
> what soft i need to install ?
> THANKS
> wang
You really should use dig or host (use dig). nslookup is deprecated.
dig is fairly good to use.
Cameron Kerr
--
[EMAIL
You will need to install the dnsutils package.
-mk
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 04:12, wang wrote:
> hello!
> i want to use nslooup
> what soft i need to install ?
> THANKS
> wang
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
hello!
i want to use nslooup
what soft i need to install ?
THANKS
wang
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Nicolas Lamirault wrote:
>
> > Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19
> > +0100 :
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I'm having a little p
Nicolas Lamirault wrote:
> Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19
> +0100 :
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm having a little problem:
> > In which debian-package do I find "nslookup" and "host"?
> &
Torstein Sletten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit le Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:18:19 +0100
:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having a little problem:
> In which debian-package do I find "nslookup" and "host"?
>
> Forgot to install this when I installed Debian
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
