On 25 Jun 2000, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
It is not this simple; in fact, I think there's an out-and-out bug.
I'll report it when I have some time to waste.
It is a bug with whoever typed dpkg-scanpackages because they did it
wrong.
deb file:/usr/local/src/debs localdebs main non-free
Then
Jason == Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jason On 25 Jun 2000, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
deb file:/usr/local/src/debs localdebs main non-free
Then apt-get update looks for
/usr/local/src/debs/dists/localdebs/{main,non-free}/binary-i386/Packages
but apt-get install pysol looks
On 25 Jun 2000, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
dpkg-scanpackages binarydir overridefile [pathprefix]
Packages
binarydir is the name of the binary tree to process (for
example, contrib/binary-i386). It is best to make this
relative to the root of the
What are the packaging frontends (dselect in particular) supposed to
do when 2 sources from sources.list provide different version numbers
of the same package?
I have a potato system, but I downloaded a couple of upgraded packages from
woody and placed them in a local mirror directory. I
--
Byns Zrrhjvffra Rcfba Xbjn Pbecbengvba, Erfrnepu naq Qrirybczrag
Ian Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are the packaging frontends (dselect in particular) supposed to
do when 2 sources from sources.list provide different version numbers
of the same package?
Don't know for sure, but based on experience I'd say they use the
latest (and greates?)
Olaf == Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
itz I have a potato system, but I downloaded a couple of upgraded
itz packages from woody and placed them in a local mirror directory.
itz I generated the Packages files with dpkg-scanpackages. That went
itz fine, so I added a deb file: line for
7 matches
Mail list logo
