I have finally got pine 4.05 installed. I think it is helping me to
dislike non-free software. Rigth now it is giving me messages I do not
understand. It always complain that Mailbox vulnerable - directory must
have 1777 protection. I cannot figure out which directory it is
complaining about. I
Anybody installed this package from project/experimental?
I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I
cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function.
Any help?
I am having a problem with apps that are color intensive (eg netscape) and
font
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Daniel Mashao wrote:
Anybody installed this package from project/experimental?
I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I
cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function.
Once more I have to say: Please, do not modify
Is there anybody working on a port of pine version 4.05 or any other
version
later than 4.0?
I want to use pine for reading emails from a pop server, but
unfortunately
the currently available debian package of pine is 3.96 or so and does
not
yet enable me to read from pop servers.
Regards,
Is there anybody working on a port of pine version 4.05 or any other
version
later than 4.0?
in /project/experimental, there are the relevant files to
build-it-yourself.
Debian is not allowed to distribute modified pine binaries.
HTH,
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of
I've been trying to compile pine 4.05 (with the sl5 option, for shadowed
pw) and it barfs on undefined references to crypt and can't find
ltermcap...any ideas? P.S. What is it about the license that doesn't allow
Debian to make a package out of it? They have compiled binaries on their
site
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, D'jinnie wrote:
I've been trying to compile pine 4.05 (with the sl5 option, for shadowed
pw) and it barfs on undefined references to crypt and can't find
ltermcap...any ideas? P.S. What is it about the license that doesn't allow
Debian to make a package out of it? They have
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
installed)
[snip]
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose and without fee to the University of
Washington is hereby granted,
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
installed)
[snip]
But this explains it:
Although the above trademark and copyright restrictions do not convey
the right to redistribute derivative
d == dsb3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
d maybe this is too pedantic, but are you saying:
d 1) it can be distributed in binary form using unpatched sources ONLY, or
This one is true.
Ciao,
Martin
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote:
from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have
installed)
[snip]
But this explains it:
Although the above trademark and copyright restrictions do not
11 matches
Mail list logo