Chris Fearnley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Removed debian-devel from the Cc: list as this is beyond Debian
policy.]
Followed Bruce's distribution list, but thank you for the info.
Have you looked at the Aladdin Ghostscript Free Public License? Peter
Deutsch has thought a lot about these issues.
Please note: the following is in no way intended as flame
to Bruce, Debian, or the FSF...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
From: William Burrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While the Qt authors may have different concerns than Knuth does over
TeX, the idea may be the same: modified versions
'Tom Julien wrote:'
IMHO, a license like Qt's is long overdue. It makes a fine
commercial product available to both X11 and Win32, yet it
provides a great mechanism to promote freeware/open standards
like Unix/X11 *over* propriety ones. Troll's reasoning for
not allowing modified versions may
It's difficult enough to promote freeware in industry with
the common lack of support misperception. Combine this
I'd suggest that rather than fixing that with wierd licenses, you
just do better marketing. Works for us :-)
_Mark_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: William Burrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While the Qt authors may have different concerns than Knuth does over
TeX, the idea may be the same: modified versions may reflect badly on
Troll Tech.
I understand their concern, I just don't share it. Debian doesn't place
this sort of restriction on
5 matches
Mail list logo
