Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-16 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The second way is that ISP's are not allowing their dialup IP addresses > from making direct conntections on port 25 to IP addresses outside of > their network. It is a simple router configuration and all IP addresses > are blocked from outbound port

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-13 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > Prof. Feedlebom wrote: > > > > First of all, why are you sending this to the Debian list? *shrug* It > > seems a bit off-topic. > > > How and/or why did Branden's original message get to the list in the > first place? Here's the E-mail header I have from what I assume

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-12 Thread Pollywog
On 12-Apr-99 Richard A Nelson wrote: > Unfortunately, I think this phenomenon is only going to get worse, > I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing ISPs start firewalling port 25 > ;-{ This would be bad for me, since my ISP's mail server is slow as molasses in liquid nitrogen. -- Andrew [PGP5.0

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-12 Thread Richard A Nelson
Unfortunately, I think this phenomenon is only going to get worse, I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing ISPs start firewalling port 25 ;-{ This action really bites those of us who *must* use more than one ISP, and/or send mail from multiple sites and would like to decide where followups go...

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-12 Thread Keith G. Murphy
id 38); 10 Apr 1999 03:38:29 - Resent-Date: 10 Apr 1999 03:38:29 - Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:37:36 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: primenet.

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 10:24:00AM -0700, Prof. Feedlebom wrote: > First of all, why are you sending this to the Debian list? *shrug* It > seems a bit off-topic. I was furious, and I was attempting to bring to other Debian users' attention the possibility that perhaps they, too, live in a ghetto

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-10 Thread Prof. Feedlebom
First of all, why are you sending this to the Debian list? *shrug* It seems a bit off-topic. > I protest in most strenous possible terms to this treatment. You apparently don't understand the entire context of the error message. Please, read on. > I absolutely DO NOT send unsolicited commercia

Re: primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 08:47:35PM -0700, J. Francois wrote: > Take a look at: > http://maps.vix.com/dul/ > > That should answer your question as to how and why your mail was blocked. > HTH. I see. Here's a pithy quote from this guy... "Loss of connectivity hurts us all. Spam hurts us all even

primenet.com rejects mail from ibm.net

1999-04-10 Thread Branden Robinson
I protest in most strenous possible terms to this treatment. I absolutely DO NOT send unsolicited commercial email. All of my mail headers are RFC 822 complaint. Most spammers put fake or bogus headers in their mails to try and cover their tracks. It is a trivial exercise to reject mails of thi