Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file.
> So I downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it.
> Then I printed it, but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper and
> hard to read.
>
> So I used display to resize it 150% and sharpen the image.
>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:57:58 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> imagemagick is one of those secret programs that people outside (and
> many inside) the linux world just don't know about, yet its so
> powerful, easy to use (scriptable!!) that I don't know how people
> can live
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:24:12PM +0100, Dan H wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:57:58 -0800
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > imagemagick is one of those secret programs that people outside (and
> > many inside) the linux world just don't know about, yet its so
> > powerful,
Wayne Topa wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
<>
Thanks guys.
I did not want to install Gimp: too many notes...
convert did not do the job, who knows why.
But using oo writer and inserting the jpeg image somehow expanded it to
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file.
So I downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it.
Then I printed it, but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper and
hard to read.
So I used display to resize it 150% and sharpen the image.
That worked
Hugo Vanwoerkom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Hi,
<>
>
> Thanks guys.
> I did not want to install Gimp: too many notes...
>
> convert did not do the job, who knows why.
>
> But using oo writer and inserting the jpeg image somehow expanded it to
> pa
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:13:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:40:57 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Hi, I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file. So I
> > downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it. Then I printed it,
> > but i
Hugo Vanwoerkom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Hi,
<>
>
> Thanks guys.
> I did not want to install Gimp: too many notes...
>
> convert did not do the job, who knows why.
>
> But using oo writer and inserting the jpeg image somehow expanded it to
> pag
Dnia 15/11/07 19:12,Hugo Vanwoerkom napisał:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file.
So I downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it.
Then I printed it, but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper
and hard to read.
So I used display to resiz
Hugo Vanwoerkom([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi,
>
> I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file.
> So I downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it.
> Then I printed it, but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper and
> hard to read.
>
> So I used display to re
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:40:57 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file. So I
> downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it. Then I printed it,
> but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper and hard to read.
> So I used
Hi,
I was sent a scanned document, it was a .jpeg file.
So I downloaded the .jpeg and used display to view it.
Then I printed it, but it was about 1/2 the size of a sheet of paper and
hard to read.
So I used display to resize it 150% and sharpen the image.
That worked OK *viewing* it but it *
12 matches
Mail list logo
