You pasted a version with both the vesa driver and the ati, and seem to
be commenting/uncommenting parts. Are there any differences beside the
driver?
Try replacing the relevant section of xorg.conf (XF86Config) with
something like the following (and make sure the ati x driver is
Let me repeat: Some details may need tweaking. I am not sure if the
correct ati driver is still called r128, and I think your video card
is not AGP, that may make some difference.
Look at your monitor's settings.
MAA
On 6/12/2010 3:25 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
You pasted a version with
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge, which use kernel 2.4
Can you help?
--
To
On 06/11/2010 04:12 PM, Long Wind wrote:
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge,
On 6/11/2010 4:12 PM, Long Wind wrote:
I have HP VL420 and etch
ati rage 128 pro (or ultra?) works fine in kernel 2.6
but in kernel 2.4, it displays strangely
I have to return to text mode (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and reboot
and I have to use vesa driver in kernel 2.4
ati driver works fine in sarge,
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 06/11/2010 07:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
Only if you're paying us lots of money for sustaining *really* way
past EOL kit.
But you aren't...
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer
On 6/11/2010 7:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
Yes. We don't need to know specific reasons. However, just knowing, as
an
On 6/11/2010 7:54 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 6/11/2010 7:04 PM, Long Wind wrote:
My reason for using old s/w doesn't matter
There are plenty of reason for running old s/w
that's why archive.debian.org exists
not only to offer sarge
but potato and rex!
but a random check of a
few sites
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
As I'm happy with the old producer
I'm unwilling to spend more energy on learning/upgrading
My machine is HP vl420 running P4
with 128Mx3 memory
On 6/11/10,
On 06/11/2010 08:18 PM, Long Wind wrote:
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
Are you implying that there's some specialized PCI card for which
there's no known 2.6 driver?
As I'm happy with the
On 6/11/2010 8:18 PM, Long Wind wrote:
Thank Mark Allums !
I use kernel 2.4 because of producer, a video capturing application
video capturing is hard to learn and config
As I'm happy with the old producer
I'm unwilling to spend more energy on learning/upgrading
My machine is HP vl420 running
the ati card is AGP
let me repeat my problem clearly
the card/driver work in etch with kernel 2.6
they work in sarge with kernel 2.4
but they don't work in etch with kernel 2.4
though x server does not change!
below is /etc/X11/xorg.conf
# /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server
On 06/11/2010 10:31 PM, Long Wind wrote:
the ati card is AGP
let me repeat my problem clearly
the card/driver work in etch with kernel 2.6
they work in sarge with kernel 2.4
but they don't work in etch with kernel 2.4
though x server does not change!
Then why not use a 2.6 kernel?
--
There
14 matches
Mail list logo
