Re: problem with wget -O

On Friday, January 29, 2021 12:20:21 PM David Wright wrote: > On Thu 28 Jan 2021 at 15:02:47 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote: > > for a change, I am 100% with Greg W., in fact, if the file already > > exists, wget should assume a bad copy was previously obtained, and > > should then very cheerfully

Re: problem with wget -O

On Thu 28 Jan 2021 at 15:02:47 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 28 January 2021 11:10:48 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:06:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > Perhaps file a bug against that page. It appears that they were > > > using -O merely to avoid overwriting

Re: problem with wget -O

On Thu 28 Jan 2021 at 11:10:48 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:06:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > Perhaps file a bug against that page. It appears that they were using > > -O merely to avoid overwriting http://master.zip with the second instance of > > wget. The

Re: problem with wget -O

On Thu 28 Jan 2021 at 15:02:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Until then, lets put this thread to rest. wget was fixed by blowing away > my /home/me/.wgetrc wget wasn't fixed, but your setup was. Now we can all live happily ever after. :) > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to

Re: problem with wget -O

On Thursday 28 January 2021 11:10:48 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:06:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > Perhaps file a bug against that page. It appears that they were > > using -O merely to avoid overwriting http://master.zip with the > > second instance of wget. The

Re: problem with wget -O

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:06:25AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > Perhaps file a bug against that page. It appears that they were using > -O merely to avoid overwriting http://master.zip with the second instance of > wget. The manpage expressly advises against doing that: "Use of -O is > not

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tue 26 Jan 2021 at 06:27:40 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 26 January 2021 04:47:27 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2021-01-26 10:40:01 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2021-01-25 17:42:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > On Monday 25 January 2021 17:04:23 Greg Wooledge wrote:

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:51:30 +0100 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-01-26 07:36:46 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:27:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > The thing I don't get was that is the direct command from their buildit > > > page. You would think that would

Re: problem with wget -O

On 2021-01-26 07:36:46 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:27:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > The thing I don't get was that is the direct command from their buildit > > page. You would think that would lead to such a common failure that it > > would be documented. > >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:35:09PM +0100, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 26 janv. 2021 à 10:44 de to...@tuxteam.de: > > > And thank Greg (I hope I'm not mis-assigning) for mentioning > > /etc/wgetrc and .wgetrc! > > > Let's not forget Darac Marjal who was the first (by a few minutes) actually

Re: problem with wget -O

On 2021-01-26 06:27:40 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > The thing I don't get was that is the direct command from their > buildit page. If they did not specify a --no-config option, their buildit page is buggy. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML -

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:27:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > The thing I don't get was that is the direct command from their buildit > page. You would think that would lead to such a common failure that it > would be documented. Nobody should have to guess that the reader has a custom

Re: problem with wget -O

Hi, 26 janv. 2021 à 10:44 de to...@tuxteam.de: > And thank Greg (I hope I'm not mis-assigning) for mentioning > /etc/wgetrc and .wgetrc! > Let's not forget Darac Marjal who was the first (by a few minutes) actually ;) Best regards, l0f4r0

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:30:39PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > Greg Wooledge (12021-01-25): > > Gene, you've been here a while, so you should know better than this. > > Where's the incentive at knowing better when one gets more help by > making no efforts? I think this is a bit unfair. I

Re: problem with wget -O

Greg Wooledge (12021-01-25): > Gene, you've been here a while, so you should know better than this. Where's the incentive at knowing better when one gets more help by making no efforts? Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: problem with wget -O

On Tuesday 26 January 2021 04:47:27 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-01-26 10:40:01 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2021-01-25 17:42:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday 25 January 2021 17:04:23 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett

Re: problem with wget -O

On 2021-01-26 10:40:01 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-01-25 17:42:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 25 January 2021 17:04:23 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ cd .. && wget -O opencv.zip

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:38:04PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: [...] > > > posted at least once today: > > > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ cd .. && wget -O opencv.zip > > > https://github.com/opencv/opencv/archive/master.zip Cannot specify > > > both -k or --convert-file-only and -O if multiple URLs

Re: problem with wget -O

On 2021-01-25 17:42:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2021 17:04:23 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ cd .. && wget -O opencv.zip > > > https://github.com/opencv/opencv/archive/master.zip

Re: problem with wget -O

Gene Heskett wrote: > Because synaptic says what is it the debian repo's is 10 years old? Well, at some point of time you stop repairing the car, you just drive it to the grave yard, no? It would be cheaper to upgrade because if you upgrade at the end you will have up to date system.

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 17:50:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2021 17:38:04 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 25 January 2021 16:48:52 Darac Marjal wrote: > > > On 25/01/2021 21:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > >> On

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 17:38:04 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2021 16:48:52 Darac Marjal wrote: > > On 25/01/2021 21:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 17:04:23 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ cd .. && wget -O opencv.zip > > https://github.com/opencv/opencv/archive/master.zip Cannot specify > > both -k or --convert-file-only and -O if

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 16:48:52 Darac Marjal wrote: > On 25/01/2021 21:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > 1) You have a shell function or alias that overrides the wget >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 16:48:52 Darac Marjal wrote: > On 25/01/2021 21:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > 1) You have a shell function or alias that overrides the wget >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ cd .. && wget -O opencv.zip > https://github.com/opencv/opencv/archive/master.zip > Cannot specify both -k or --convert-file-only and -O if multiple URLs are > given, or in combination > with -p or -r. See

Re: problem with wget -O

On 25/01/2021 21:07, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: 1) You have a shell function or alias that overrides the wget command. Diagnose this by running "type wget". >>>

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 15:55:31 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > 1) You have a shell function or alias that overrides the wget > > > command. Diagnose this by running "type wget". > > > > Interesting: > > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ type

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:47:03PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > 1) You have a shell function or alias that overrides the wget command. > >Diagnose this by running "type wget". > > > Interesting: > gene@coyote:~/src/build$ type wget > wget is hashed (/usr/bin/wget) > gene@coyote:~/src/build$

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 15:32:19 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:13:55PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Why Greg, do you seem to always blame the messenger? > > Because the message is ripped up into pieces, and you're telling us > only some half-remembered piece of it. > > >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:13:55PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Why Greg, do you seem to always blame the messenger? Because the message is ripped up into pieces, and you're telling us only some half-remembered piece of it. > direct copy/paste from the opencv build instructions html page: >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 15:10:35 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:00:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 25 January 2021 13:45:34 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > Greetings all; > > > > > > > >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 15:09:22 deloptes wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > But I figured my luck would run out before I did. > > From 97% done in contributed: > > [ 97%] Building CXX object > > modules/python2/CMakeFiles/opencv_python2.dir/__/src2/cv2.cpp.o > > In file included > > from > >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 13:53:48 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:45:34PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch > > > version of wget is broken,

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:00:40PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 25 January 2021 13:45:34 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Greetings all; > > > > > > I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch > > >

Re: problem with wget -O

Gene Heskett wrote: > But I figured my luck would run out before I did. > From 97% done in contributed: > [ 97%] Building CXX object > modules/python2/CMakeFiles/opencv_python2.dir/__/src2/cv2.cpp.o > In file included > from >

Re: problem with wget -O

On Monday 25 January 2021 13:45:34 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Greetings all; > > > > I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch > > version of wget is broken, does not accept the -O filename syntax. > > Are

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:45:34PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch version > > of wget is broken, does not accept the -O filename syntax. Gene, you've been here

Re: problem with wget -O

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:40:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch version > of wget is broken, does not accept the -O filename syntax. > Are you sure you have the right wget? It works for me: root@debian:~# cat

problem with wget -O

Greetings all; I don't know if this has been hashed out already, but the stretch version of wget is broken, does not accept the -O filename syntax. If there is a backport fix, what to I put in my sources.list to get it? Thanks. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in