* 2022-04-21 10:08:04+0800, Henrik S. wrote:
> The dir /var/log/journal/ on my debian host increases quite quickly.
> why this happens? Do you know how to suppress it?
User can control log sizes with /etc/systemd/journald.conf file but
systemd manages them automatically quite intelligently. Logs
On Thu, Apr 21 2022 at 10:08:04 AM, Henrik S wrote:
> The dir /var/log/journal/ on my debian host increases quite quickly.
> why this happens? Do you know how to suppress it?
>
That's the storage for the logs maintained by journald. You can manage
these logs by editing
The dir /var/log/journal/ on my debian host increases quite quickly.
why this happens? Do you know how to suppress it?
Thanks.
On Wed 20 Apr 2022 at 20:09:54 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 02:31:30PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I have a machine set aside to test several configurations of Debian 11.
> >
> > Is there away to have the Grub Menu _automatically_ display the assigned
> >
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 02:31:30PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have a machine set aside to test several configurations of Debian 11.
>
> Is there away to have the Grub Menu _automatically_ display the assigned
> partition name rather than than /dev/sdaN ?
>
I wonder whether this changes if
I have a machine set aside to test several configurations of Debian 11.
Is there away to have the Grub Menu _automatically_ display the assigned
partition name rather than than /dev/sdaN ?
connait pas user4 :(
Donc question(s) : pourquoi la boite mail de user4 n'a-t-elle pas été
créée en même temps que le compte user4 ?
qu'est-ce que j'ai oublié ?
et surtout : comment les boites de user1, user2 et user3 ont été créées
en premier lieu ???
elle est où cette satanée virtual
On Tue 15 Feb 2022 at 19:28:48 (+0100), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 22, 17:23:52, David Wright wrote:
> > > On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not sure about the Debian installer (except that it does boot and
> > > > run Linux, but not sure it ever switches to
On Ma, 15 feb 22, 11:59:59, David wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 07:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > > How does it decide which partition to boot from? I think this is what
> > > the OP is asking.
>
> > As far as I understand the path to
On Lu, 14 feb 22, 17:23:52, David Wright wrote:
> > On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure about the Debian installer (except that it does boot and
> > > run Linux, but not sure it ever switches to another kernel
> > > midway), but the Grub bootloader is kind of a
With respect to the original problem, this response is moot.
On Sun 13 Feb 2022 at 18:50:43 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> > If you want to boot A, just select it from the menu presented by B's
> > grub.
> >
> > When you boot and run A, you can update-grub¹ and that will scan
> > and see both systems,
On Sun 13 Feb 2022 at 19:26:51 (+0100), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > Typically, one would have a primary, "master" linux system which would
> > be used to write an MBR pointing to itself. The other, legacy system
> > would have its grub.cfg kept
On Mon 14 Feb 2022 at 10:18:13 (+1100), David wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 05:27, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
>
> TLDR:
> On the topic of grub automatic configuration
> 1) suggestions how to avoid it
> 2) why I prefer to do that
>
> Disclaimer:
On 2022-02-15, David wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 10:24, David Wright wrote:
>
>> Effectively, Grub has two shells, Grub> and Grub rescue>, depending on
>> whether the "normal" module has been loaded, and about the only thing
>> you can sensibly do without normal is to find it and insmod it.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 10:24, David Wright wrote:
> Effectively, Grub has two shells, Grub> and Grub rescue>, depending on
> whether the "normal" module has been loaded, and about the only thing
> you can sensibly do without normal is to find it and insmod it.
> But most people will never see
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 07:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > How does it decide which partition to boot from? I think this is what
> > the OP is asking.
> As far as I understand the path to search for the second stage, modules
> and grub.cfg is
On Mon 14 Feb 2022 at 12:13:20 (-0500), Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described
> > > is more like the
> > > behavior of the Debian installer
to let the bootloader
> > know which is the system partition, but it could be (ab)used for
> > multi-booting ;)
>
> That's a good clarification that the active partition is a Microsoft thing
> implemented by the bootcode Microsoft installs in the MBR of the device
> chosen to boot fro
On Lu, 14 feb 22, 10:41:52, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> That's a good clarification that the active partition is a Microsoft thing
> implemented by the bootcode Microsoft installs in the MBR of the device
> chosen to boot from. Now for an unanswered question: What
> does boo
On 2/14/2022 10:19 AM, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described is more
like the
behavior of the Debian installer (i.e., it boots an image (with a Linux
kernel) into RAM to use temporarily for the
for an unanswered question: What
does bootcode installed by Debian Linux in the MBR do? How does it
decide which partition to boot from? I think this is what the OP
is asking.
Regards,
Chuck
On 2022-02-14 10:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I did mis-remember this, and the behavior I described is more like the
behavior of the Debian installer (i.e., it boots an image (with a Linux
kernel) into RAM to use temporarily for the installation.
I just wanted to try to correct this
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 09:04:50 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> The way I understand it (but I may be misremembering), grub temporaily
> boots into a, well I'll say restricted Linux kernel and OS which is used
> by grub until it boots up the main system. The kernel used in grub may
> not
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 05:27, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
TLDR:
On the topic of grub automatic configuration
1) suggestions how to avoid it
2) why I prefer to do that
Disclaimer: contains generalisations and lacks full justifications of
points made.
On Du, 13 feb 22, 11:01:48, David Wright wrote:
>
> Typically, one would have a primary, "master" linux system which would
> be used to write an MBR pointing to itself. The other, legacy system
> would have its grub.cfg kept up-to-date, but would never touch the
> MBR by running grub-install.
Hi David,
yes, that is what I thought, would be working. But sadly did not.
I expected, after using update-grub, that os-prober would detect both
partitions with the menu.lst or grub.cfg inside and create two entries in the
boot menu.
However, this did not work, only one (the last
Hi,
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
> > partition indicates that.
> > So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not UEFI).
Not necessarily. It is specified that the EFI System Partition may
be marked by a MBR partition
t kali (except the coloured sherbet of my childhood).
So your layout, above, worries me as it seems to imply more than
you're actually saying here. (Not the layout of the partitions
on the disk, but the text's alignment in the layout above.)
> This is the structure, and as said before, only ONE driv
On Du, 13 feb 22, 02:40:27, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> This is my understanding of how grub works.
>
> It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
> partition indicates that.
> So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not UEFI). So the first
> thing that
>
> /var (encrypted)
This is the structure, and as said before, only ONE drive.
Now my question: Is it possible to configure grub that way, that I can choose
either kali or debian to boot?
What I might to know, please correct me:
Both are running different kernels. As far as I understood grub, I ca
> /var (encrypted)
This is the structure, and as said before, only ONE drive.
Now my question: Is it possible to configure grub that way, that I can choose
either kali or debian to boot?
What I might to know, please correct me:
Both are running different kernels. As far as I understood grub, I ca
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 04:04:43 AM Hans wrote:
> But how can I tell grub, to use the kernel of the second /boot?
>
> I dunno, if it is possible at all, to get a dual boot, the way I want it.
> With a combination of Windows + Linux on one harddrive this is working,
> however, just because
d.
>
> The partitions are as followed:
>
> kali-linux: 1st primary -> /boot
> 2nd > /
>
>
> debian3rd primary -> /boot
> 4th logical > /
> > swap
> > /home (encrypted)
> > /usr (encrypted)
> > /var (encrypted)
>
>
> This is the st
and as said before, only ONE drive.
Now my question: Is it possible to configure grub that way, that I can choose
either kali or debian to boot?
What I might to know, please correct me:
Both are running different kernels. As far as I understood grub, I can set the
root partition ( / ) with th
I did something similar a couple of years ago when I installed Arch on a
PC with Debian-Buster and a BIOS Legacy option.
I can't say whether this procedure will work with UEFI, since I haven't
tried that. You proceed at your own risk.
1. Power the computer OFF and disconnect all external
testing the integration of sbuild in ISAR[1] and have a
question related to the CLEAN_SOURCE behavior.
"When running sbuild from within an unpacked source tree, run the
'clean' target before generating the source package. This might require
some of the build dependencies necessary for running the '
Hi,
please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to debian-user@l.d.o.
Quoting quirin.gylsto...@siemens.com (2022-02-08 15:40:40)
> we are currently testing the integration of sbuild in ISAR[1] and have a
> question related to the CLEAN_SOURCE behavior.
>
>
> "When runnin
Dear all,
we are currently testing the integration of sbuild in ISAR[1] and
have a question related to the CLEAN_SOURCE behavior.
"When running sbuild from within an unpacked source tree, run the
'clean' target before generating the source package. This might require
some of the
eep. Now grub
> comes up with /dev/sdd as the default and /dev/sda as the second choice.
> What I want to do is install a second Bullseye on /dev/sda without changing
> the grub boot order. How do I go about accomplishing this?
>
> I have googled the question and not found a
is install a second Bullseye on /dev/sda
without changing the grub boot order. How do I go about accomplishing this?
I have googled the question and not found an answer that I understand.
Thanks in advance.
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
www.molecular-modeling.net
614.312.7528 (c)
Skype
On 05/02/2022 12:13, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
Does anyone have an address that willl actually get to the Ultimaker-cura
developers? I have a wish, bug to report.
Thanks all, pm's ok.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
Might this be a good place to start?:
https://support.ultimaker.com/hc/en-us
Greetings all;
Does anyone have an address that willl actually get to the Ultimaker-cura
developers? I have a wish, bug to report.
Thanks all, pm's ok.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
24/01/2022 à 13:56, Billard François-Marie a écrit :
Bonjour
question de novice quand à la gestion NFTABLES et n'étant pas
spécialiste des réseaux.
Je dispose d'une machine qui d'un coté distribue des adresses pour un
réseau local ( en filaire IP_Locale) et de l'autre coté un connexion
WIFI
Bonjour
Le 24/01/2022 à 13:56, Billard François-Marie a écrit :
Bonjour
question de novice quand à la gestion NFTABLES et n'étant pas
spécialiste des réseaux.
Je dispose d'une machine qui d'un coté distribue des adresses pour un
réseau local ( en filaire IP_Locale) et de l'autre coté un
Bonjour
question de novice quand à la gestion NFTABLES et n'étant pas
spécialiste des réseaux.
Je dispose d'une machine qui d'un coté distribue des adresses pour un
réseau local ( en filaire IP_Locale) et de l'autre coté un connexion
WIFI (IP_WIFI) temporaire sur un portail captif (INTERNET
On 1/17/22 02:54, Michael Lange wrote:
(...)
>
> So maybe this argument is case sensitive and changing "origin" into
> "Origin" may fix the issue?
>
Hello Michael,
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it does not work. I had actually
dug into the source a tiny bit before posting:
Unlike
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:09:30 -0700
Antonio Russo wrote:
(...)
> I am trying to use Policy.create_pin to do so, but cannot seem to get
> it working:
>
> import apt_pkg
>
> apt_pkg.init()
> cache = apt_pkg.Cache(progress=None)
> policy = apt_pkg.Policy(cache)
> #policy.create_pin('origin',
On Vi, 14 ian 22, 08:09:30, Antonio Russo wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to use apt_pkg to get a "best candidate" for a package, but with
> slightly different constraints than I have set up in /etc/apt/preferences.d.
>
> I am trying to use Policy.create_pin to do so, but cannot seem to get it
Hello!
I'm trying to use apt_pkg to get a "best candidate" for a package, but with
slightly different constraints than I have set up in /etc/apt/preferences.d.
I am trying to use Policy.create_pin to do so, but cannot seem to get it
working:
import apt_pkg
apt_pkg.init()
cache =
On Friday, January 7, 2022 6:38:14 PM EST Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 1/7/22 03:01, gene heskett wrote:
> ...
>
> > I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
> > underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but
> > clicking
> > the link does not do
On 1/7/22 03:01, gene heskett wrote:
...
I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but clicking
the link does not do anything. Is it supposed to send the default browser
to that page? If so, where should
On 2022-01-07, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I use the Shift + Right-click trick to get the menu in applications that
> seem to block Gnome Terminal's handling of the URL. I've found the
> trick useful with Mutt and Midnight Commander.
>
I see. I only experimented in a man page.
* On 2022 07 Jan 10:26 -0600, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-01-07, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >
> > Did you try Shift + Right-click and select "Open Link" or some such in
> > your terminal? That is what works for me in Gnome Terminal.
> >
>
> This is what works for me in gnome-terminal:
>
> URL
On Friday, January 7, 2022 6:41:45 AM EST Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> cat /etc/debian_version
11.2
And now I see how it works since it does that way, thank you.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that
On Friday, January 7, 2022 8:05:59 AM EST Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:59:36 -0500
> gene heskett wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > That is installed, but I can't find a configurator for it. And I am a
> > heavy user of mc but the file menu popup steals the F10 key, also a
> > pita. But there is
On Friday, January 7, 2022 6:16:21 AM EST David wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:59, gene heskett wrote:
> > On Friday, January 7, 2022 5:21:03 AM EST David wrote:
> > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:01, gene heskett
wrote:
> > > > debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
> > > >
> > > >
On 2022-01-07, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> Did you try Shift + Right-click and select "Open Link" or some such in
> your terminal? That is what works for me in Gnome Terminal.
>
This is what works for me in gnome-terminal:
URL detection[edit]
GNOME Terminal parses the output and automatically
* On 2022 07 Jan 04:01 -0600, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
>
> I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
> underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but clicking
> the link does not
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 08:13:42AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 01:09:38PM -, Curt wrote:
> > I'd rather just cut and paste the URI in the always-open browser, but
> > then again I've never had that old hacker spirit.
>
> That's what I do too. I like my terminals to
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 01:09:38PM -, Curt wrote:
> I'd rather just cut and paste the URI in the always-open browser, but
> then again I've never had that old hacker spirit.
That's what I do too. I like my terminals to be relatively frill-free.
Obviously that's just my preference, and I know
>
> The behavior is highly specific to the terminal emulator in question.
> We can't guess how Gene's terminal is behaving (or has the capability
> of behaving) without knowing which one it is.
>
It would seem in gnome-terminal (sorry) hyperlinks are
clickable.
For xterm, I guess th
On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:59:36 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
...
> That is installed, but I can't find a configurator for it. And I am a heavy
> user of mc but the file menu popup steals the F10 key, also a pita. But
> there is not an F10 checked in the settings for xfce or konsole that I can
>
> up a menu for me which allows me to open the link.
>
> So: man apt, for example, has a URL for bugs at the bottom: if I right click
> that underlined link, I get the option to open it / copy it or whatever.
The behavior is highly specific to the terminal emulator in question.
W
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 05:01:05AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
>
> I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
> underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but clicking
> the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:59, gene heskett wrote:
> On Friday, January 7, 2022 5:21:03 AM EST David wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:01, gene heskett wrote:
> > > debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
> > > I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
On Friday, January 7, 2022 5:21:03 AM EST David wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:01, gene heskett wrote:
> > debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
> >
> > I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
> > underscored if you click on them while reading the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 21:01, gene heskett wrote:
> debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
>
> I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
> underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but clicking
> the link does not do anything. Is it
Greetings all;
debian 11.1, 64 bit net-install updated yesterday.
I've noted that there can be links to a web page in a man page that are
underscored if you click on them while reading the man page, but clicking
the link does not do anything. Is it supposed to send the default browser
to
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:33:03 +0100
Julius Hamilton wrote:
> Google would never intentionally send an email like that.
Of course they wouldn't send you an email like that. They have much
better ways of snooping information about you.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
On 31/12/21 12:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote:
Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
Google would never intentionally send an email like that.
+1
Who would subscribe with a 'noreply' type
On Thursday, December 30, 2021 11:33:03 AM Julius Hamilton wrote:
> Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
> Google would never intentionally send an email like that.
+1
Yes, it’s fishy and nonsensical, I encourage you not to interact with it.
Google would never intentionally send an email like that.
Best,
Julius
On Thu 30. Dec 2021 at 17:29, wrote:
> Hello I received from nore...@google.com the following email in Czech
> (that I translated in english):
>
>
Hello I received from nore...@google.com mailto:nore...@google.com the
following email in Czech (that I translated in english):
"And the value-added tax issuance ①③O③⑦②⑨③O①⑥The emblem is synchronized and
regular and can be checked. And the invoice emblem is synchronized and regular
and can be
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 08:32:14PM -0800, David Robert Newman wrote:
> I asked doas author Ted Unangst about this. His reply:
>
> > Sorry, only very limited env replacement can be done in setenv. root's
> > environment isn't available before the switch.
>
> Ergo, it is just as you suspected.
On 12/18/21 7:08 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:20:59PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
Thanks for this. I get similar results where doas shows root's PATH -- but I
cannot execute a file called '/usr/local/sbin/s', which is owned by
root:root and has 0750 permissions, unless I
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:20:59PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
> Thanks for this. I get similar results where doas shows root's PATH -- but I
> cannot execute a file called '/usr/local/sbin/s', which is owned by
> root:root and has 0750 permissions, unless I specify the full path:
>
>
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, David Newman wrote:
Thanks for this. I get similar results where doas shows root's PATH -- but I
cannot execute a file called '/usr/local/sbin/s', which is owned by root:root
and has 0750 permissions, unless I specify the full path:
dnewman@coppi:~$ echo $PATH
On 12/17/21 8:16 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:20:43PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
How to configure /etc/doas.conf so a non-root user gets root's PATH?
This works for me:
unicorn:~$ PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
unicorn:~$ cat /etc/doas.conf
permit setenv {
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:20:43PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
> How to configure /etc/doas.conf so a non-root user gets root's PATH?
This works for me:
unicorn:~$ PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
unicorn:~$ cat /etc/doas.conf
permit setenv {
bullseye 11.1, 5.10.0-9-amd64, doas 6.8.1-2
How to configure /etc/doas.conf so a non-root user gets root's PATH?
Neither of these options work when attempting to execute a command in
/usr/sbin via doas (e.g., 'doas '):
permit nopass setenv {
On Fri 10 Dec 2021 at 00:41:29 (-0500), Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 12/9/21, john doe wrote:
> > On 12/9/2021 8:55 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
> >> Does that work or is it a typo? I've always used:
> >>
> >> apt-get autoremove --purge
> >>
> > $ apt-get --help
> > apt 2.3.13 (amd64)
> > Usage:
On 12/9/21, john doe wrote:
> On 12/9/2021 8:55 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
>> Does that work or is it a typo? I've always used:
>>
>> apt-get autoremove --purge
>>
> $ apt-get --help
> apt 2.3.13 (amd64)
> Usage: apt-get [options] command
> apt-get [options] install|remove pkg1 [pkg2 ...]
>
On Fri 10 Dec 2021 at 05:49:06 (+0100), john doe wrote:
> On 12/9/2021 8:55 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, john doe wrote:
> > > On 12/8/2021 10:16 AM, Piper H wrote:
> > > > Thanks, I'll check them out. :)
> > >
> > > My suggestion would be to do the following commands:
> > > $
On 12/9/2021 8:55 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, john doe wrote:
On 12/8/2021 10:16 AM, Piper H wrote:
Thanks, I'll check them out. :)
My suggestion would be to do the following commands:
$ apt-get --autoremove purge mysql-connector-java
Does that work or is it a typo? I've
On Mi, 08 dec 21, 22:24:41, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
>
> 3) you may set repos from debian 11 and install software AND
> dependencies - your debian will be partially upgraded and some another
> soft may be broken. Don't recommend this way, system may be broken and
> need reinstall in worst case.
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, john doe wrote:
On 12/8/2021 10:16 AM, Piper H wrote:
Thanks, I'll check them out. :)
My suggestion would be to do the following commands:
$ apt-get --autoremove purge mysql-connector-java
Does that work or is it a typo? I've always used:
apt-get autoremove --purge
That's all right. thank you.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 1:25 AM Stanislav Vlasov
wrote:
> 2021-12-08 15:51 GMT+05:00, Piper H :
> > On Debian 10, can I force install the software which is released on
> Debian
> > 11?
> > For example, a given software has default installation version 1.0 for
> >
Thx so much, Stanislav!
pam_mkhomedir works like a charm (and it didn't even take me too long to figure
out how to set it up)
best,
~c
--
charlie derr
systems thinker and nature lover
https://medium.com/@cderr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2021-12-08 17:07 GMT+05:00, charlie derr :
> On this relatively new platform, i was able to quite trivially get pam-ldap
> functionality (for SSH logins) working. However, after installing the oddjob
> package(s), a user who does not yet have a home directory on the server is
> still not getting
2021-12-08 15:51 GMT+05:00, Piper H :
> On Debian 10, can I force install the software which is released on Debian
> 11?
> For example, a given software has default installation version 1.0 for
> debian 10, but has version 2.0 for debian 11.
> I want to use the version 2.0 on debian 10, how will I
Hi,
regrettably i cannot contribute anything to your actual question.
But the question of mail delays can be answered out of my mailbox:
charlie derr wrote:
> my initial attempt to post the below to the
> list well over half an hour ago from my other address (CCed) hasn't ye
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 07:51:11 -0500
charlie derr wrote:
Hello charlie,
>(apologies for the resend, but my initial attempt to post the below to
>the list well over half an hour ago from my other address (CCed) hasn't
>yet made it to the list, though i don't know why, so...)
Yes it did.
--
Greetings everyone,
(apologies for the resend, but my initial attempt to post the below to the list
well over half an hour ago from my other address (CCed) hasn't yet made it to
the list, though i don't know why, so...)
i'm not subscribed to the list (but will check back via the web archives
Greetings everyone,
i'm not subscribed to the list (but will check back via the web archives for
responses that don't get CCed or BCCed to me).
Given that fact, do feel free to loop me in directly via (B)CC if you wish
(though again, it's not necessary).
i've been using debian for ~25 years,
Piper H wrote:
> On Debian 10, can I force install the software which is released on Debian
> 11?
> For example, a given software has default installation version 1.0 for
> debian 10, but has version 2.0 for debian 11.
> I want to use the version 2.0 on debian 10, how will I do it?
A few
On Debian 10, can I force install the software which is released on Debian
11?
For example, a given software has default installation version 1.0 for
debian 10, but has version 2.0 for debian 11.
I want to use the version 2.0 on debian 10, how will I do it?
Thank you.
Piper
Hi David
Thanks for the info you provided.
The original purpose I asked the question is that I did need that jar file
for Mysql connector for Spark.
As you see the operations below:
$ pyspark --jars mysql-connector-java-8.0.27.jar
Python 3.6.9 (default, Jan 26 2021, 15:33:00)
[GCC 8.4.0
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 19:21, Piper H wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Sorry for this silly question.
> I downloaded the JDBC drive from mysql website:
> https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/j/
>
Hi.
Just for your information, because you might not realise:
Debian is a huge pro
On 12/8/2021 10:16 AM, Piper H wrote:
Thanks, I'll check them out. :)
My suggestion would be to do the following commands:
$ apt-get --autoremove purge mysql-connector-java
$ apt-get update && apt-get install libmariadb-java
Add 'sudo' if you need it.
--
John Doe
Thanks, I'll check them out. :)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:35 PM Stanislav Vlasov
wrote:
> 2021-12-08 13:21 GMT+05:00, Piper H :
> > I downloaded the JDBC drive from mysql website:
> > https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/j/
> >
> > And got a file name:
> >
801 - 900 of 20442 matches
Mail list logo
