But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
before, in favor of the system administrator(Recall the /usr/doc/*.gz
issue
BS == Brian Servis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BS But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next
BS time xdm is upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the
BS package managment tools over writing what the system
BS administrator sets has been debated before, in favor
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote
But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
before, in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Brian Servis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Debian has no policy about runlevels, which is pretty strange if
you ask me, they rejected a bug against policy on this issue. Nothing
is stopping you from changing your own system around. But be aware that
whenever you
*- On 10 Aug, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote about Re: rc?.d policy?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Brian Servis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Debian has no policy about runlevels, which is pretty strange if
you ask me, they rejected a bug against policy on this issue. Nothing
is stopping you from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
tools over writing what the system administrator sets has been debated
*- On 10 Aug, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote about Re: rc?.d policy?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Brian Servis wrote:
But if a user removes the S99xdm link in rc2.d then the next time xdm is
upgraded it will be added again. This issue of the package managment
tools
Is there any policy on which run level does what? Just looking at
rc2.d and rc3.d they appear identical. Personally I like level 2 to
boot non-X and level 3 to be exactly the same, but starts an X login
manager, e.g., wdm or xdm. Is there any reason I shouldn't update the
rc2.d and rc3.d
*- On 9 Aug, Gary L. Hennigan wrote about rc?.d policy?
Is there any policy on which run level does what? Just looking at
rc2.d and rc3.d they appear identical. Personally I like level 2 to
boot non-X and level 3 to be exactly the same, but starts an X login
manager, e.g., wdm or xdm
9 matches
Mail list logo
