On Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:17:51 GMT Otavio Exel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> > > > > - are symlinks really fast?
>
> > > >Quite, except on NFS.
>
> > > could you be more specific? could you describe a situation where
> > > symlinks would slow-down things and a possible solution eliminating
> > >
> > > > - are symlinks really fast?
> > >Quite, except on NFS.
> > could you be more specific? could you describe a situation where
> > symlinks would slow-down things and a possible solution eliminating
> > thesymlink?
> Normally, no NFS data is cached on the client, which means that for
> a sm
Dale Martin wrote:
>
> Daniel Mashao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > why not put /var and /tmp in the same root partition?
>
> When you run out of space on your root partition while compiling, it's a
> real pain. I've had it happen. I've never run out of space on /var, or on
> / if I don't have
Daniel Mashao wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 1997, Dale Martin wrote:
>
> > Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > This is a lot of space wasted unless you have large spool directories
> > > (news/mail). For a reasonable single-user station, 64MB should be
> > > largely enough on /var. /tmp i
Daniel Mashao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> why not put /var and /tmp in the same root partition?
When you run out of space on your root partition while compiling, it's a
real pain. I've had it happen. I've never run out of space on /var, or on
/ if I don't have /tmp on it. So, I have /tmp soft
On 14 Nov 1997, Dale Martin wrote:
> Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is a lot of space wasted unless you have large spool directories
> > (news/mail). For a reasonable single-user station, 64MB should be
> > largely enough on /var. /tmp is left to your choice (16 is a good
Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a lot of space wasted unless you have large spool directories
> (news/mail). For a reasonable single-user station, 64MB should be
> largely enough on /var. /tmp is left to your choice (16 is a good
> number).
I would find 16M for /tmp WAY to
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997 10:24:10 -0200 Otavio Exel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
br) wrote:
> - are symlinks really fast?
Quite, except on NFS. You really should worry about it unless you're
a performance freak.
> - I read somewhere that "500mb for /var and /tmp" is fine;
> what exactly does that mean? two
hi everybody,
I'm re-thinking my HD partitioning and would apreciate some advice!
- are symlinks really fast?
- I read somewhere that "500mb for /var and /tmp" is fine;
what exactly does that mean? two partitions summing up 500mb?
one 500mb partition and symlinks from /var and /tmp?
- why i
9 matches
Mail list logo
