On Sun, 16 Aug 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got (at least) one photo taken while the camera was moving.
>
> Only one? :)
>
> > I'd really like to get rid of the vageness caused by this motion.
>
> Mmmh.
> On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got (at least) one photo taken while the camera was moving.
>
> Only one? :)
Well, one that I care about. Much more, actually.
>
> > I'd really like to get rid of the vageness caused by this motion.
>
> Mm
On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got (at least) one photo taken while the camera was moving.
Only one? :)
> I'd really like to get rid of the vageness caused by this motion.
Mmmh. I doubt that this is possible... but I'd like to be proofed wrong.
A
Hi,
I've got (at least) one photo taken while the camera was moving.
I'd really like to get rid of the vageness caused by this motion.
I *know* it should be possible to get rid of this vagueness, but
I've never actually seen a programme that does it (only the 'sharpen'
options in the Gipm, xv, et
4 matches
Mail list logo