On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:14:06PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > What would english emails written by people using utf8 systems look
> > like?
>
> So far, no difference.
>
Won't they fail the 8-bit test? (My system is not utf8 at t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:14:06PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> What would english emails written by people using utf8 systems look
> like?
So far, no difference.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian a
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:04:16PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> > Or can it be assumed that people will be posting non-english email to this
> > list.
>
> It happens. I don't know what the volunteer listmaster wants to do,
> but for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:11:50PM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> Perhaps to get an open debate on a potentially touchy subject?
Don't. That's just trolling. Especially since the archive shows what
happens. If you have some list management issues, go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> Or can it be assumed that people will be posting non-english email to this
> list.
It happens. I don't know what the volunteer listmaster wants to do,
but for those who at least want to
on Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I keep getting spam on the list that is completelly foreign.
>
> SA scores it as this in regards the foreign langauge component:
> 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
> 2.8 UNWANTED_L
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:54:01PM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> sounds like a great idea, reduce the spam volume by 2/3rds.
> When do you plan to implement this?
Well... funny you should ask ;-). I used debian-devel as the test
list, managed to stuff it up, and there's now a 7 hour delay or so,
fo
Pascal Hakim said:
>la(reject non english email)
> This is non-trivial. The current plan is to just have some procmail
> rules to deal with this, which can be set on a per-list basis, instead
> of having different Spam Assassin configurations for different lists.
>
> Not really. This list is suppo
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:02:59 +
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we tune the sa rules for this list to reject completelly
> > non-english email?
>
> I wonder why you're sending this to debian-user rather than
> listmaster?
Perhaps to get an open debate on a potentially touchy s
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:10:08PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> > I keep getting spam on the list that is completelly foreign.
> >
> > SA scores it as this in regards the foreign langauge component:
> > 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body inclu
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> I keep getting spam on the list that is completelly foreign.
>
> SA scores it as this in regards the foreign langauge component:
> 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
> 2.8 UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY BODY: M
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:03:30AM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> I keep getting spam on the list that is completelly foreign.
>
> SA scores it as this in regards the foreign langauge component:
> 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
> 2.8 UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY BODY: M
I keep getting spam on the list that is completelly foreign.
SA scores it as this in regards the foreign langauge component:
1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
2.8 UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY BODY: Message written in an undesired language
3.2 CHARSET_FARAWAY BODY: Chara
13 matches
Mail list logo
