Re: rpm -i no /bin/sh

1999-06-17 Thread scratch
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Paul wrote: > I have alien installed and would of course hope to convert the RPM's I > require once I am sure I can use Debian for my needs. > > I thought initially while I am trying to get things set up I would > just try installing as RPM's. Debian appears to offer an RPM i

Re: rpm -i no /bin/sh

1999-06-17 Thread Paul
On 17-Jun-99 scratch wrote: >You *are* aware of the fact that debian uses .deb files, and not rpm's, >right? Yes. >Ofcourse, you *can* use rpm's, but if there's a .deb available, by >all means, use it :) Check out www.debian.org/Packages. There isn't. > Now, if you *have* to use rpm's, take a

Re: rpm -i no /bin/sh

1999-06-17 Thread Peter Makholm
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am in the early stages of setting up a Debian system. So far, so > good. I have now tried to install a few RPM's and failed due to > dependancy problems with /bin /sh. It means that the RPM package has a depency on a RPM package providing /bin/sh You shouldn'

Re: rpm -i no /bin/sh

1999-06-17 Thread scratch
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Paul wrote: > I am in the early stages of setting up a Debian system. So far, so good. I > have > now tried to install a few RPM's and failed due to dependancy problems with > /bin > /sh. I thought this means that /bin/sh doesn't exist. I have checked and it > does > as a

rpm -i no /bin/sh

1999-06-17 Thread Paul
I am in the early stages of setting up a Debian system. So far, so good. I have now tried to install a few RPM's and failed due to dependancy problems with /bin /sh. I thought this means that /bin/sh doesn't exist. I have checked and it does as a link to /bin/bash. What else could it mean? Paul