On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:37:37PM -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
> The purpose of the ls was to sort the filenames, but looking more
> clostey, bash sorts them already. csh and ksh do the same, and
> glob(3) sorts by default. I'm not sure if all shells do that or not,
> but it seems that most do, a
In <20090716151953.ge4...@wks0082.feds.uwaterloo.ca>, Eric Gerlach wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:36:24AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> > How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
>> > directory tree?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:36:24AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
> > directory tree?
>
> You might want to look at how git does this. As I understand it, git
>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
> directory tree?
You might want to look at how git does this. As I understand it, git
stores hashes of trees, so the implementation may help you.
--
"Oh, look: r
Tzafrir Cohen writes:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:08:05AM -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
[...]
>> For the file contents, if there are no subdirectories you can use:
>>
>> cat `ls` |sha1sum
>
> Which is basically:
>
> cat * | sha1sum
The purpose of the ls was to sort the filenames, but loo
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:08:05AM -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
> You will need to figure out what metadata you care about and what you
> don't, then. For example, do you want to detect a renamed file? A
> change in mtime/ctime/utime? A change in permissions?
>
> For the
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson
was heard to say:
>
> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
> directory tree?
Depending on how important uniqueness is, you could just cat the
whole thing (sorting filenames first, of course) and pipe it to
On 2009-07-06 23:08, Scott Gifford wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
On 2009-07-06 20:29, Adrian Levi wrote:
2009/7/7 Mark Neidorff :
On Monday 06 July 2009 08:30 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
complete directory tree?
This is what I was thinki
Ron Johnson writes:
> On 2009-07-06 20:29, Adrian Levi wrote:
>> 2009/7/7 Mark Neidorff :
>>> On Monday 06 July 2009 08:30 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
complete directory tree?
>> This is what I was thinking, If you don't want to re
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
> directory tree?
hash everything and then hash the result? (if you don't care about metadata
that is - if you do add a nice stat of everything into the final hash)
On 2009-07-06 20:29, Adrian Levi wrote:
2009/7/7 Mark Neidorff :
On Monday 06 July 2009 08:30 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
complete directory tree?
This is what I was thinking, If you don't want to retain the tar file
then pipe it to sha1
2009/7/7 Mark Neidorff :
> On Monday 06 July 2009 08:30 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
>> complete directory tree?
This is what I was thinking, If you don't want to retain the tar file
then pipe it to sha1sum.
Adrian
--
24x7x365 != 24x7x52
On Monday 06 July 2009 08:30 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
> complete directory tree?
>
> --
> Scooty Puff, Sr
> The Doom-Bringer
Tar the tree and then calculate the sha1sum of the tar file. Easy, no?
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a
complete directory tree?
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
