Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your reason for having the
ambiguity of wether to call it 3.2 or 4.0 is just to keep people from
assigning etch a number?
I think this is quite logical, as there is some structure in those
numbers - 4.0 means a big leap, 3.2
On Sunday 10 July 2005 21:55, Joris Huizer wrote:
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your
reason for having the ambiguity of wether to call
it 3.2 or 4.0 is just to keep people from assigning
etch a number?
I think this is quite logical, as there is some
Mark Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 10 July 2005 21:55, Joris Huizer wrote:
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your
reason for having the ambiguity of wether to call
it 3.2 or 4.0 is just to keep people from assigning
etch a number?
I
On Monday 11 July 2005 00:23, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Mark Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 10 July 2005 21:55, Joris Huizer wrote:
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your
reason for having the ambiguity of wether to
call it 3.2 or 4.0 is
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:23:10AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Mark Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 10 July 2005 21:55, Joris Huizer wrote:
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your
reason for having the ambiguity of wether to call
it
Hendrik Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:23:10AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Mark Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 10 July 2005 21:55, Joris Huizer wrote:
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your
reason for
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:23:18PM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Hendrik Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, no matter whether the etch release next year or later is going to
be a big or a little upgrade, etch isn't stable yet, and so if
it's going to be 4.0 or 3.2 or 3.1415 or
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
I'm already seeing documentation referring to Debian 3.2 (etch).
Where is this? It's
On Saturday 09 July 2005 23:56, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew
Parsons wrote:
I'm already seeing documentation
Mark Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 09 July 2005 23:56, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew
10 matches
Mail list logo
