Re: statically linked ls ???

1998-01-16 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
"Xavier Bergade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd need a statically linked ls (ie no need of lib/ld-linux.so.1 and > lib/libc.so.5) > > Is there any binary already available? > If not how can I do it myself? (I have the fileutils source tar) > > thanx

Re: statically linked ls ???

1998-01-16 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
wrote: > I'd need a statically linked ls (ie no need of lib/ld-linux.so.1 and > lib/libc.so.5) > > Is there any binary already available? > If not how can I do it myself? (I have the fileutils source tar) > > thanx. > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e

Re: statically linked ls ???

1998-01-16 Thread joost witteveen
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > I'd need a statically linked ls (ie no need of lib/ld-linux.so.1 and > lib/libc.so.5) > > Is there any binary already available? ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/debian/upload/ls > If not how can I do it myself? (I have

statically linked ls ???

1998-01-16 Thread Xavier Bergade
I'd need a statically linked ls (ie no need of lib/ld-linux.so.1 and lib/libc.so.5) Is there any binary already available? If not how can I do it myself? (I have the fileutils source tar) thanx. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [