Stefan Janecek wrote:
uh,uh. things start getting complicated, especially because i missed the
beginning of the thread. from what i can figure out, your configuration
is the following:
GOOFY
(192.168.1.1)eth0 eth1(192.168.2.1)
Robert wrote:
If your problem is that name service isn't working (despite the hosts file),
it could be that Goofy is trying to find mini and mickey on the internet,
where they are not visible. I suggest not using a valid internet domain.
I'd suggest orion.home or something more creative.
In a galaxy not too far away, robert_wilhelm_land spoke on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at
01:31:16PM +0100:
What does bind for domain name resolution mean? Does the mashine
want to contact a internet nameserver?
yes, that's exactly what it means.
Surprising that today after boot-up GOOFY _can_ ping
Robert Guthrie wrote:
If you could give an example (including ascii diagrams) of what you're trying
to accomplish, and and explanation of what advantage you hope to get from
that setup, maybe we can get closer to understanding what you really want to
do. I don't think I'm really qualified to
On Thursday 16 November 2000 07:41, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
MICKEY can ping GOOFY because of using the local C:\windows\hosts
MINI can ping GOOFY because of using the local /etc/hosts
But GOOFY cannot ping MICKEY or MINI by name although GOOFY's
/etc/hosts containes:
#file /etc/hosts
This advice applies to /etc/host.conf, not resolve.conf.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:42:34AM -0600, Robert Guthrie wrote:
... Something else to
look at first is your /etc/resolve.conf*. It should contain a line like
order hosts,bind, which tells it to look first in /etc/hosts, and then go
In a galaxy not too far away, Robert Guthrie spoke on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at
01:29:24PM -0600:
On Thursday 09 November 2000 12:05, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Robert Guthrie wrote:
Now, I'm not quite sure what your setup is here, so let see if your setup
is the same as mine...
1 linux
Stefan Janecek wrote:
Mostly, I just share home out so that I have the same www bookmarks, same
mail folders, and same custom scripts (under ~/bin) available to me. There
are lots of issues when you do this kind of thing, though (you have to make
sure your /etc/group and /etc/passwd
Robert Guthrie wrote:
Okay, this I know about:
On an ethernet network every packet of information that is transmitted by a
computer is visible to all NICs on the network. For a NIC to actually accept
a packet for it's machine, the packet must be addressed to that NIC's MAC
address (the
On Friday 10 November 2000 08:27, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Robert Guthrie wrote:
... An analogy that illustrated a wrong concept...
Exactly what I assumed.
... and another bad analogy illustrating what really does happen on a single
network (no gateway involved).
I'm not to sure if this
On Friday 10 November 2000 14:48, Robert Guthrie wrote:
As you may have figured out, having 2 NICs on the same subnet would not do
anything for you. The computer with 2 NICs would either recieve duplicate
packets, and have to do double the work (forwarding duplicate packets), or
it would have
On Wednesday 08 November 2000 23:21, John wrote:
As far as i know you will have to use 2 subnets and if you want the
192.168.0.xxx range to be able to talk
to the 192.168.1.xxx range you will need to do ipforwarding between the 2.
I agree with this assessment.
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
John wrote:
Ok ill have a go,
I think its something like this :) ?
for each IP number bound to each NIC a route is set up in the routing table
to tell
the OS what to do with specific IP numbers
ie if NIC1=192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0
and NIC2=192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
then routes
Robert Guthrie wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2000 23:21, John wrote:
As far as i know you will have to use 2 subnets and if you want the
192.168.0.xxx range to be able to talk
to the 192.168.1.xxx range you will need to do ipforwarding between the 2.
I agree with this assessment.
On Thursday 09 November 2000 12:05, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Robert Guthrie wrote:
Now, I'm not quite sure what your setup is here, so let see if your setup
is the same as mine...
1 linux box, serving NFS and SMB to 2 desktops that dual-boot linux and
windows 98.
Under linux, I
On Thursday 09 November 2000 13:06, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Does ipfowarding relate on something special compiled into the kernel
or do I need a certain package?
Yes and Yes. Read the howto documents on IP-Masquerading and IP-Chains.
Then re-read them, then meditate and pray for
Ok ill have a go,
I think its something like this :) ?
for each IP number bound to each NIC a route is set up in the routing table to
tell
the OS what to do with specific IP numbers
ie if NIC1=192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0
and NIC2=192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
then routes would be set up for each
Would someone kindly help me in understanding why I cannot configure
two ethernet cards using the same subnet but different IP's on one
mashine?
In this case I would like to setup a linux server for a smb-win32 and
a nfs-nfs connection (in all 3 mashines)
Any short comment is appreciated
Robert
18 matches
Mail list logo
