On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
We need a list for each package! You can't ruly home in
on your questions of interest until you have dedicated
lists for each package.
On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
On 21/07/2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
>> Ahoj,
>>
>> it seems, that t
On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 21/07/2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
>>> wrote:
Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
> Ahoj,
>
> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for tes
On 24/07/2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On 21/07/2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
Ahoj,
it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
users.
>>>
>>> I agree
On 7/24/14, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 21/07/2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
>>> Ahoj,
>>>
>>> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
>>> users.
>>
>> I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... the
On 21/07/2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
>
>
> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
>> Ahoj,
>>
>> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
>> users.
>
> I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically
> at least), so we could imagine
On 7/23/14, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 July 2014 03:55:36 The Wanderer wrote:
>> Then people promptly started expressing confusion over the whole thing,
>> and here we are.
>
> Curt often loses me. He is well named. ;-)
I recommend going back to read that initial reply from "Dr. Jeckyll
On Wednesday 23 July 2014 03:55:36 The Wanderer wrote:
> Then people promptly started expressing confusion over the whole thing,
> and here we are.
Curt often loses me. He is well named. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/22/2014 04:34 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 17:29:11 The Wanderer wrote:
>> Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Seemed obvious enough to me, but I'm not
>> necessarily a typical audience.
>
> I got lost at "Have you undergone a person
On Ma, 22 iul 14, 12:28:20, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> The trouble is that you didn't then change the Subject line, so
> less-well-behaved mail clients will still sort it as part of the same
> thread, and even for people who use better ones the message is still
> being presented as being about the su
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 17:29:11 The Wanderer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/22/2014 12:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:35:58 Curt wrote:
> >> On 2014-07-22, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >>> Where do you get the Mr. from? I can't see it. I sus
Le 22.07.2014 15:38, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
And emacs ... just ... wierdo!
Yeah, vim is better :) (let's change the nowaday usual trolling about
systemd and go back to good old traditional trolls :p)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/22/2014 12:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:35:58 Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2014-07-22, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> Where do you get the Mr. from? I can't see it. I suspect it
>>> isn't there. As far as I can see, Doctor Miles F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/22/2014 12:16 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Concerning burying my request for help in an existing thread. I used
> Emacs to delete the reply-to header line and thought that would be
> enough. Obviously, not. I have learned yet another thing not t
On 20140722_1037+0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 22.07.2014 00:00, Paul E Condon a écrit :
> >Please help.
>
> Wow nice off-topic... I have no idea about where this is related to
> the question of the interest of splitting debian-user ML into a
> stable and a testing ML...
>
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:35:58 Curt wrote:
> On 2014-07-22, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:03:17 Curt wrote:
> >> now you've turned into Mr. Miles.
> >
> > Where do you get the Mr. from? I can't see it. I suspect it isn't
> > there. As far as I can see, Doctor Miles Fidelman
Curt wrote:
On 2014-07-22, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Have you undergone a personality transplant or has your rabbit died?
Huh?
You were Dr. Fidelman and now you've turned into Mr. Miles.
If there's a Dr. Fidelman out there - it ain't me.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:58:16 -0400 Miles Fidelman
napísal:
> Slavko wrote:
> > Ahoj,
> >
> > Dňa Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:33:28 -0400 Miles Fidelman
> > napísal:
> >
> >> Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
> >> testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the
On 2014-07-22, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:03:17 Curt wrote:
>> now you've turned into Mr. Miles.
>
> Where do you get the Mr. from? I can't see it. I suspect it isn't there.
> As
> far as I can see, Doctor Miles Fidelman sometimes calls himself, Miles
> Fidelman or M. Fid
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 15:03:17 Curt wrote:
> now you've turned into Mr. Miles.
Where do you get the Mr. from? I can't see it. I suspect it isn't there. As
far as I can see, Doctor Miles Fidelman sometimes calls himself, Miles
Fidelman or M. Fidelman.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:47:36PM CEST, Slavko said:
> Ahoj,
>
> Dňa Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:33:28 -0400 Miles Fidelman
> napísal:
>
> > Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
> > testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the lists seems like a
> > very bad idea.
On 2014-07-22, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Have you undergone a personality transplant or has your rabbit died?
>>
>>
> Huh?
>
You were Dr. Fidelman and now you've turned into Mr. Miles.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Curt wrote:
On 2014-07-22, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the lists seems like a
very bad idea.
Have you undergone a personality transplant or has your rabbit died?
Huh?
--
In theory, t
Slavko wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:33:28 -0400 Miles Fidelman
napísal:
Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the lists seems like a
very bad idea.
Someone inhibit you to subscribe to both?
What - you don't
On 2014-07-22, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
> testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the lists seems like a
> very bad idea.
Have you undergone a personality transplant or has your rabbit died?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:33:28 -0400 Miles Fidelman
napísal:
> Some of us are actually interested in knowing what's going on with
> testing, before it becomes stable. Separating the lists seems like a
> very bad idea.
Someone inhibit you to subscribe to both?
regards
--
Slavko
http:/
On 7/22/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/22/14, David Guntner wrote:
>> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>> There is one
>>>
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>>>
>>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
>>> used list and that it's not a list for frea
On 7/22/14, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I use Wheezy. I have been using Debian since Potato, as I remember, I
> started with Debian just after Y2K. I started out to write about the
> debian-testing ML but first I need help with a crazyness in my mail
> system that I just noticed, and must be a reinstal
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 7/22/14, David Guntner wrote:
Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
There is one
https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd.
Neither is
On 7/22/14, David Guntner wrote:
> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>> There is one
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>>
>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
>> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd.
>
> Neither is this o
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, wrote:
> > Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
> >> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
> >> users.
> >
> > I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically at
> > least)
Le 22.07.2014 00:00, Paul E Condon a écrit :
Please help.
Wow nice off-topic... I have no idea about where this is related to the
question of the interest of splitting debian-user ML into a stable and a
testing ML...
Anyway, we can guess from what you posted that you have started vlc
som
On 2014-07-21, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
>
> [0x8c579e8] main libvlc error: vlc_object_find_name("puzzle") is not safe!
> This appears in the window that was running Mutt and displaying the incoming
This is vlc (a media player) complaining; what this has to do with mutt
or your email workflow escap
On Lu, 21 iul 14, 16:00:04, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I use Wheezy. I have been using Debian since Potato, as I remember, I
> started with Debian just after Y2K. I started out to write about the
> debian-testing ML but first I need help with a crazyness in my mail
> system that I just noticed, and mus
I use Wheezy. I have been using Debian since Potato, as I remember, I
started with Debian just after Y2K. I started out to write about the
debian-testing ML but first I need help with a crazyness in my mail
system that I just noticed, and must be a reinstall of wheezy that I
completed a few days ag
Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, David Guntner wrote:
>> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one
>>>
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>>>
>>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
>>> used list and tha
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, David Guntner wrote:
> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>
>> There is one
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>>
>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
>> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about syste
Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> There is one
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>
> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd.
Neither is this one, but that doesn't seem to stop people...
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, wrote:
> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
>>
>> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
>> users.
>
> I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically at
> least), so we could imagine that different MLs for
Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
Ahoj,
it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
users.
I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically
at least), so we could imagine that different MLs for (beta-)testing and
productive usage (question
40 matches
Mail list logo
