-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:21:26AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:18:07PM +1100, terryc wrote:
> > What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
> >
> > Been about 2000 sin
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:18:07PM +1100, terryc wrote:
> What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
>
> Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
> the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
Back
terryc wrote:
> What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
>
> Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
> the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
>
> Is there any aptitude/apt-get e
What is the simple procedure to install additional Tetex packages now?
Been about 2000 since I used LaTeX a lot and I find that wrapfig is
the way to wrap text around a figure these days, so I'd like to use it.
Is there any aptitude/apt-get equivalent and what was/is the
installation update
dénommé tetex.
Quels sont donc ces latex.ini et pdflatex.ini qui semblent poser problème ?
Mais plus généralement à quoi sert tetex ? Si ce n'est que des paquets
de type xpdf sont en rapport (xpdf et acroread recommandés pour
installation avec tetex-bin)?
J'ai lu qu'il servait à faire fonctionner
Bonjour à toutes et à tous,
Relativement nouvel utilisateur de Debian-GNU-Linux, j'ai actuellement,
dans le cadre de la mise à niveau de mon système Debian Etch / 4.0 en
vue de passer à Lenny, un problème avec un programme dénommé tetex.
Alors que je tentais de le mettre à jour, j'ai obtenu le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/08 23:39, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[snip]
Thank you very much. This file is of a daunting size (7096 lines). It
Send it to the band printer in the computer room?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGIN
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:33:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/31/08 23:39, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[snip]
Thank you very much. This file is of a daunting size (7096 lines). It
Send it to the band printer in the computer room?
I don't know, my Epson LQ-2080 would handle that just fine;
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 18:22:18 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[...]
This second produced a null output. And following up on that hint,
and with the help of /usr/share/doc/tex-common/TeX-on-Debian.txt,
I was able to create 10local.cfg in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ with:
Map pmn.map
This
* Florian Kulzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| But these are details, and mostly the problem is solved, and I'm
| grateful for your help,
|
| There might be a problem with pdftex.map. Look at the output of
|
| kpsewhich pdftex.map
|
| and check if this files contains
cards
(all of which worked beautifully before) work at all.
But the problem I'm most anxious to solve at present has to do with
the change from TeTeX to TeXLive.
I have some fonts hand-installed in /usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/
(Adobe Minion) which I use more or less constantly. All worked very
well
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 00:00:13 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
Lord, so I decided to upgrade my laptop (a Lenovo T60) to
testing/lenny
[...]
But the problem I'm most anxious to solve at present has to do with
the change from TeTeX to TeXLive.
I have some fonts hand-installed in /usr
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:00:13AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
Lord, so I decided to upgrade my laptop (a Lenovo T60) to
testing/lenny so as to try out TeXLive and suddenly found myself in
one of those linux weekends of long ago (which I've never been sure if
I missed or not) when you're up
* Douglas A. Tutty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| TeXLive is in Etch, you didn't have to go to Lenny...
Sigh ... well, thank you. This is good to know.
* Florian Kulzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| Run the following two commands and post the output:
| find /usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/
Hi, all:
I've searched the group for messages on these.
I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
Or anybody just going with texlive having any unexpected
Rick Dooling:
Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
I don't do much Latex anymore, but the migration should be painless. You
just may have to hunt down some packages you are using with 'apt-cache
search'es.
Texlive appears to be the future, so I wouldn't install
* Rick Dooling [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 13:28]:
Hi, all:
I've searched the group for messages on these.
I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch
On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Command:
$ sudo apt-get
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:18:02 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Command:
$ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin tetex-extra tetex-base
on debian oldstable (sarge)
Thanks
--
Mathieu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Command:
$ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin tetex-extra
tetex
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:24:00PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean:
tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed
Command:
$ sudo apt-get install docbook-utils jadetex tetex-bin \
tetex
De todas maneras, en debian etch/i386 se instala sin problemas ¿usas
otra rama?
Ocupo etch, en dos computadores, en un funciona todo ok y en el portatil
tengo el problema.
Creo que istale kile y todas las dependencia, entre las cuales esta
tetex-bin se instalarían automaticamente.
Es
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:00:27AM -0400, Jorge Guerrero wrote:
Hola,
necesito trabajar con latex y hay un paquete tetex-bin que no puedo
instalar.
Me tira el siguiente error
Un paquete no se pudo instalar. Intentado recuperarse:
Configurando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
No hay alternativas
El día 24/09/07, Agustin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:00:27AM -0400, Jorge Guerrero wrote:
Hola,
necesito trabajar con latex y hay un paquete tetex-bin que no puedo
instalar.
Me tira el siguiente error
Un paquete no se pudo instalar. Intentado
El sáb, 22-09-2007 a las 01:00 -0400, Jorge Guerrero escribió:
Hola,
necesito trabajar con latex y hay un paquete tetex-bin que no puedo
instalar.
Me tira el siguiente error
Un paquete no se pudo instalar. Intentado recuperarse:
Configurando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
No hay alternativas para
El día 23/09/07, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El sáb, 22-09-2007 a las 01:00 -0400, Jorge Guerrero escribió:
Hola,
necesito trabajar con latex y hay un paquete tetex-bin que no puedo
instalar.
Me tira el siguiente error
Un paquete no se pudo instalar. Intentado
Hola,
necesito trabajar con latex y hay un paquete tetex-bin que no puedo
instalar.
Me tira el siguiente error
Un paquete no se pudo instalar. Intentado recuperarse:
Configurando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
No hay alternativas para oxdvi.bin.
dpkg: error al procesar tetex-bin (--configure):
el
the current status of tetex - texlive transition. Is there
going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
some related packages in advance? Thank you.
$ aptitude search ~i~ntetex
i A tetex-base - Basic TeX input files of teTeX
i A tetex-bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am running up-to-date Etch on my desktop. I would like to upgrade to
Lenny recently.
I wonder the current status of tetex - texlive transition. Is there
going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
some related packages
* Wei Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070909 01:14]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am running up-to-date Etch on my desktop. I would like to upgrade to
Lenny recently.
I wonder the current status of tetex - texlive transition. Is there
going to be any known problem
of tetex - texlive transition. Is there
going to be any known problem during the upgrade? Do I need to purge
some related packages in advance? Thank you.
$ aptitude search ~i~ntetex
i A tetex-base - Basic TeX input files of teTeX
i A tetex-bin- The teTeX
- Tong - [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the transition for
the moment.
You should put your tetex
Hi.
- Tong -, 25.08.2007 05:51:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:03:42 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
See the manpage of aptitude and look for hold.
[…]
Please be *responsible* with what you said. Do you know that your hold
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:44:28PM +, - Tong - [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
Holding the various tetex packages (tetex-bin, tetex-common,
tetex-extra, tetex-doc) should work -- but I wouldn't be surprised
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:38:52 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
You just could take my hint for further research if it doesn’t work directly.
(You could have come up with the idea to put everything tex-related on hold,
for
example.)
Thanks for the hint, as you may have already discovered from
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Holding the various tetex packages (tetex-bin, tetex-common,
tetex-extra, tetex-doc) should work -- but I wouldn't be surprised
if they get dragged in by dependencies anyway. aptitude holds don't
prevent versioned dependencies from forcing
Hi,
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the transition for
the moment.
thanks
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http
In your apt.conf file try a line like exclude texl* and see if that helps.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, - Tong - wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:48:25 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
I just upgraded from Etch to Lenny, and have loads of things to fix,
keeping tetex from upgrading to texlive will sure ease the transition for
the moment
Hi.
- Tong -, 25.08.2007 01:44:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
See the manpage of aptitude and look for hold.
Regards, Mathias
--
debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:03:42 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Is there any way to stop dist-upgrade from upgrading tetex to texlive?
See the manpage of aptitude and look for hold.
so what?
Actively participate in group discussion is good thing, but please be
responsible with what you said
Hey guys,
I searched the mailing list for answers to the texlive vs tetex issues. The
answers seems to be that texlive is the newer for updated distribution for tex
and latex documents. Thus, I installed the 'texlive-latex-base' package and was
a happy camper. Latex was working fine.
However
On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:23, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Hey guys,
I searched the mailing list for answers to the texlive vs tetex issues. The
answers seems to be that texlive is the newer for updated distribution for
tex and latex documents. Thus, I installed the 'texlive-latex-base
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070706 14:21]:
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which
On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably,
if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find
that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch goes stable, and all
packages have been replaced by texlive. Or something like that.
Is this a typo? Etch
On 2007-07-07, BartlebyScrivener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 6, 12:40 pm, Tyler Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably,
if you just let apt handle all the upgrades you will probably find
that you no longer have tetex by the time Etch goes stable, and all
packages have been replaced
On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, Tyler Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Kind of. But my last dist-upgrade involved grabbing a whole slew of texlive
packages
David Fox wrote:
On 06 Jul 2007 17:13:19 GMT, *Tyler Smith* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Kind of. But my last dist-upgrade
H.S. wrote:
Same here. From all the texlive packages that are to be intall, there at
least a few tetex package still, e.g. tetex-bin tetex-extra.
These packages I would expect to be purged by aptitude automatically (by
reporting they are no longer used) some time soon.
-HS
Just now
both tetex and texlive packages? And, finally, what's the relation
between these two kind of packages?
thanks,
-HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
these days?
tetex is old and deprecated, texlive is its successor. In the long run, all
the debian packages will be migrated to texlive from tetex. The transition
has been announced sometime back on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html . Only
recently the texlive
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any changes going on in Latex packages in Testing these
days? Do I need both tetex and texlive packages? And, finally,
what's the relation between these two kind of packages?
Tetex is not longer maintained upstream, so Debian
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Tyler
Thanks for the explanation. I will probably wait and let things settle
on their own
* H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070706 14:21]:
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Thanks for the explanation. I will probably wait
Russell L. Harris wrote:
* H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070706 14:21]:
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally painless.
Thanks for the explanation. I
On 2007-07-06, Russell L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070706 14:21]:
Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-07-06, H.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the list you'll find several threads about people
switching from tetex to texlive now, which is generally
I've seen a few threads where some folks have had trouble installing
live tex.
What is the current status of this under Etch?
Is the recommended procedure to remove tetex first?
Or can they coexist?
I use Synaptic mainly.
Thanks for any help.
rd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
. However if
you are running testing, please wait for couple more days till texlive
2007-10 descends into testing and then you can upgrade to it. If you are
running sid, I think most of the bugs that arised when transitioning from
tetex to texlive have been fixed. So mostly you should be fine upgrading
On Jul 4, 2:40 pm, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
Thank you. I'm running Etch.
rd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sim, os unicos erros que foram apresentados foram esses,
a noite eu te mando o retorno inteiro do apt-get do erro,
Desde já
Grato.
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática escreveu:
Eduardo Rodrigues escreveu:
Miguel,
instalei o texlive, mais retorna o mesmo erro, uso o lenny,
E:
Ao tentar instalar o denome ou o noteedit ou o rosegarden, ele necessita do
textex-bin mais o pacote da erro:
Instalando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.postinst: line 948:
/usr/share/tex-common/tetex-bin-upgrade: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado
dpkg: erro processando
Eduardo Rodrigues escreveu:
Ao tentar instalar o denome ou o noteedit ou o rosegarden, ele necessita
do textex-bin mais o pacote da erro:
Instalando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.postinst: line 948:
/usr/share/tex-common/tetex-bin-upgrade: Arquivo ou diretório não
Em 01/07/07, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
Eduardo Rodrigues escreveu:
Ao tentar instalar o denome ou o noteedit ou o rosegarden, ele necessita
do textex-bin mais o pacote da erro:
Instalando tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.postinst
Eduardo Rodrigues escreveu:
Miguel,
instalei o texlive, mais retorna o mesmo erro, uso o lenny,
E: texlive-common: subprocesso post-installation script retornou código
de saída de error 1
E: texlive-doc-base: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado
E: texlive-base-bin: problemas de
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
my two cents,
Jerome
On Debian testing with texlive, pdflatex is a symbolic link to pdfetex.
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Dear all,
the last upgrade in testing made me transit from tetex to texlive.
All works fine but my impression is that pdflatex now produces much
bigger (more than twice as big) pdf-file (~ 600 pages) as before with tetex.
Has any one else made similar experiences?
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker
On 5/21/07, Jörg-Volker Peetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
the last upgrade in testing made me transit from tetex to texlive.
All works fine but my impression is that pdflatex now produces much
bigger (more than twice as big) pdf-file (~ 600 pages) as before with tetex.
Has any one else
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the pdf file. Try
running pdffonts on pdf files produced by different versions of
pdflatex. I believe this is typically what you want, especially when
Hello,
I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
my two cents,
Jerome
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the
On 5/21/07, Jörg-Volker Peetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
I hope you mean the file size has increased, not the page count.
The newer pdflatex embeds all (most?) fonts in the pdf file. Try
running pdffonts on pdf files produced by different versions of
pdflatex. I
On 5/21/07, Jerome BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed that, by default, pdflatex is no more pdflatex:
does your pdflatex links tp pdftex ?
That has been usual for some time now. The pdfetex binary changes
behaviour depending on what name it is called with.
See the TeX
it
was...) was that the directory structure under ~/texmf has to mirror
that of /usr/share/texmf-texlive/. So just putting a .bst file in
~/texmf and running mktexlsr (=texhash?) didn't work. It needed to be
in ~/texmf/bibtex/bst/.
I had to do that also for tetex
Anyways, the rest works
just putting a .bst file in
~/texmf and running mktexlsr (=texhash?) didn't work. It needed to be
in ~/texmf/bibtex/bst/.
I had to do that also for tetex
I probably had tetex improperly set up wrt to source files, but
somehow whatever I cobbled together that was working under tetex
Hey all,
So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
it actually updates, but I've also heard tell
On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400
Amy Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
time to get with the program
On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400
Amy Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've
had to remove some TeX component or other because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means
component or other because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people
experience big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead
of just installing
because it now
won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's
time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people
experience big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead
of just installing TeXLive onto a system
month or two has the details
of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
installing texlive is probably a good idea.
Also, (very importantly) does AUCTeX work with TeXLive?
Once I got texlive installed I had no problems with Auctex.
HTH,
Tyler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, but that is irrelevant to the question
since tetex doesn't have XeTeX (good utf and truetype font support)
(another thread on this list in the last month or two has the details
of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
installing texlive is probably a good idea.
Also, (very importantly
, but that is irrelevant to the question
since tetex doesn't have XeTeX (good utf and truetype font support)
(another thread on this list in the last month or two has the details
of that). Doing an apt{get,itude} purge of the tetex stuff before
installing texlive is probably a good idea.
Also, (very importantly
* Amy Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070507 13:49]:
... its time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since
it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people experience
big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead of just installing
TeXLive onto a system without any former
On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tyler Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files
(ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories
If you have non-standard files you should put them in ~/texmf
all
the TeTeX files, then installed TeXLive, and tested it out
on a couple of documents (on the way I noticed that a couple
of packages I use *all the time* (apacite and apa.cls) which
I'd previously had to find the source for were included in
the distribution! Good, good, good stuff.
So now
Russell L. Harris wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
texlive'?
Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you
must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing
TeXLive.
I
* KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070425 15:42]:
While the installation of texlive went fine with my Sid box, it did take
quite a lot of space doing that upgrade. It ended up using more than
500MB in my /usr partition. Did anyone notice that?
In my installation of etch, /usr/share/texmf-texlive
Upgrade will eat a half gig. Maybe all this text-live language modules should
be installable to a different partition or burnable to an offline CD or DVD.
Why? How often will they be used? Nice to have them available but too much
disk space for some of us.
Shoud I file a wish-list?
--
To
, because tetex no longer exists...
Regards,
Jose Luis.
- --
ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es
San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve
Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267
Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
texlive'?
Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you
must purge all the teTeX configuration files before installing
TeXLive.
I failed to do so, and ended up
On 2007-04-15, Russell L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
Are there any issues to be aware of or is it just an 'aptitude install
texlive'?
Very important! For TeXLive to operate properly, it appears that you
must purge all the teTeX configuration files before
Hello toutes et tous,
Ben, je ne suis pas dans la merde alors :
# dpkg -L tetex-bin | grep 35
^
euh, c’est censé être dans tetex-base, pas -bin...
Bon, semblerait que cela ait été releasée un peu vite cette Etch...
Déjà, pour Sarge, TeTeX était foireux... je n'ai pas
2007/4/12, Claudux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider...
Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en
espérant que cela serve !
Oui, je l'ai eu par ailleurs. Merci
PK
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ Patrice
:58 / $ find . | grep article.cls
./usr/local/matlab7/sys/tex/latex/base/article.cls
./usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/article.cls
./usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/extsizes/extarticle.cls
11:01 / $
I do not know what triggered this behavior.I tried to uninstall and then
install again the tetex
2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
/tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920
What is the output of:
ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/
dpkg -S dvips35.map
kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map
kpsewhich --show-path=map
grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Kubieziel wrote:
2007/4/12, Ivan Glushkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
/tmp/tetex.updmap.SzH23920
What is the output of:
ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/
bsr-interpolated.map
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Glushkov escribió:
So, any idea what can be wrong?
Yes, tetex does not longer exists. Try tex live ;-)
Regards,
Jose Luis.
- --
ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Wiedersich escribió:
I know, sooner or later I will have to migrate from my present teTeX to
TeX live (currently running etch). Both are available for etch. I'm a
happy user of teTeX, not missing any features and just wondering of when
Salut,
J'ai toutes les peines du monde à faire la transition de TeX de Sarge vers Etch.
Même en purgeant totalement mon ancienne installation (ce qui est un
comble pour une migration...), impossible d'installer TeTeX :
# aptitude install tetex-bin
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Patrice Karatchentzeff, mercredi 11 avril 2007, 18:20:53 CEST
Salut,
’soir,
J'ai toutes les peines du monde à faire la transition de TeX de Sarge vers
Etch.
Même en purgeant totalement mon ancienne installation (ce qui est un
comble pour une migration...), impossible d'installer TeTeX
1 - 100 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
