Le 02.12.2014 19:27, tv.deb...@googlemail.com a écrit :
On 02/12/2014 20:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
[cut]
Also, what is EBR (or EPBR, which seems to be some sort of enhanced
whatever may be a EBR)?
Extended Boot Record on DOS disks ? Where information about extended
partition
Le 20.11.2014 22:26, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 21/11/14 06:45, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
Might be worth fscking the disk first in case that's where the
problem lies.
Why ? fsck works on filesystems, not disks or partition tables.
Good question - because I didn't
On 02/12/2014 20:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
[cut]
Also, what is EBR (or EPBR, which seems to be some sort of enhanced
whatever may be a EBR)?
Extended Boot Record on DOS disks ? Where information about extended
partition is stored.
Le Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:56:51 +0100,
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Now, fact is that the hard-disk partition table is no longer correct,
and when I plug it (it is an USB HD) into a Debian system, it makes
udev eating all my memory, and more.
Could you please open a bugreport against
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 20/11/14 12:45, Martin Read wrote:
On 20/11/14 01:03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
I think it's msdos.
AFAIK mdos partition tables don't support anywhere near that number of
slices. :(
MS-DOS partition tables support any number
On 20/11/14 20:13, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 20/11/14 12:45, Martin Read wrote:
On 20/11/14 01:03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
I think it's msdos.
AFAIK mdos partition tables don't support anywhere near that number of
slices. :(
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
Might be worth fscking the disk first in case that's where the problem lies.
Why ? fsck works on filesystems, not disks or partition tables.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 21/11/14 06:45, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
Might be worth fscking the disk first in case that's where the problem lies.
Why ? fsck works on filesystems, not disks or partition tables.
Good question - because I didn't spend much time thinking about it, or,
because I
Le Lun 17 novembre 2014 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, what part of that disk should I extract, which could be usable
and sharable? Partition table, of course, which is probably at disk's
beginning, but how long might
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
Le Lun 17 novembre 2014 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, what part of that disk should I extract, which could be usable
and sharable? Partition table, of course, which is
Le Mer 19 novembre 2014 21:16, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
Le Lun 17 novembre 2014 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, what part of that disk should I extract, which could be
On 20/11/14 11:14, Morel Bérenger wrote:
Le Mer 19 novembre 2014 21:16, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
Le Lun 17 novembre 2014 19:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, what part of that
On 20/11/14 01:03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
I think it's msdos.
AFAIK mdos partition tables don't support anywhere near that number of
slices. :(
MSDOS extended partitions contain a linked list of logical partitions.
It looks, from the pattern of
On 20/11/14 12:45, Martin Read wrote:
On 20/11/14 01:03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 20/11/14 04:06, Morel Bérenger wrote:
I think it's msdos.
AFAIK mdos partition tables don't support anywhere near that number of
slices. :(
MSDOS extended partitions contain a linked list of logical
Hello.
I think most of my problem's description is in title, but here are some
more informations.
I have a hard disk on which I tried a... quite unusual... procedure to
install another OS. My try in this procedure [1] did not went well at
all, but it's not the subject of this mail.
Now,
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Now, fact is that the hard-disk partition table is no longer
correct, and when I plug it (it is an USB HD) into a Debian system,
it makes udev eating all my memory, and more.
Please image the partition table so that someone can
Le 17.11.2014 17:55, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Now, fact is that the hard-disk partition table is no longer
correct, and when I plug it (it is an USB HD) into a Debian system,
it makes udev eating all my memory, and more.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
So, what part of that disk should I extract, which could be usable
and sharable? Partition table, of course, which is probably at
disk's beginning, but how long might it be?
That depends. What kind of partition table?
--
One disk
18 matches
Mail list logo
