On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:22:05PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 26/09/16 14:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> > On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >> Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released
> >> linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It
On 26/09/16 14:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released
>> linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without
>> complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness -
On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote:
Hey all,
Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released
linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without
complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness - does the
'unsigned' refer to something else?
Richard
Hey all,
Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released
linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without
complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness - does the
'unsigned' refer to something else?
Richard
4 matches
Mail list logo