Re: unsigned linux-image?

2017-05-29 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:22:05PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > On 26/09/16 14:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > > On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released > >> linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It

Re: unsigned linux-image?

2016-09-25 Thread Richard Hector
On 26/09/16 14:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hey all, >> Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released >> linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without >> complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness -

Re: unsigned linux-image?

2016-09-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 26/09/16 14:43, Richard Hector wrote: Hey all, Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness - does the 'unsigned' refer to something else? Richard

unsigned linux-image?

2016-09-25 Thread Richard Hector
Hey all, Does anyone know what the deal is with the recently-released linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned package? It installs without complaint, so aptitude doesn't mind its unsigned-ness - does the 'unsigned' refer to something else? Richard