Hi,
first I'd like to thank Kevin for his nice diagram!
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 20:38, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a
nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) )
but then I also got one concern, especially if this
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
unstable is described as suited for ...laptops and desktops on non-critical
systems...
testing is described as ... can be used for desktop systems that need more
stability...
I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
unstable is described as suited for ...laptops and desktops on
non-critical
systems...
testing is described as ... can be used for desktop systems that need more
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
unstable is described as suited for ...laptops and desktops on
non-critical
systems...
testing is described as ... can be used
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
unstable is described as suited for ...laptops and desktops on
non-critical
systems...
testing is described as ... can be used for desktop systems that need more
stability...
I
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I could have written that sentence better. Here it is:
Agreed. Unstable is recommended only for people that know what they are
doing. Certainly not for desktop usage by casual users (if they are the
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to
this distribution. This distribution will never get released; instead,
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to
this distribution. This distribution will never get released;
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to
this distribution.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500, Kevin Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Nice work. Maybe use the alignment functions of xfig on the boxes and arrows?
If you really want to be complete, the aging of
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 10:47:50AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
unstable is described as suited for ...laptops and desktops on
non-critical
systems...
testing is described as ... can be used for desktop systems that need more
Olaf Conradi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
Most of the development work that is done in
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:22:58AM +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500, Kevin Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Nice work. Maybe use the alignment functions of xfig on
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 07:52:22PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050107 19:46]:
Yes, a legend for the acronyms would be fine.
Oh, I just saw, that your diagramm has a legend. I'm wondering, why I
didn't noticed it the other day..
Yours
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
|| On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500
|| Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
km Hi Folks,
km I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
km appreciated!
IMHO have one wrong information on that.
Hi Kevin!
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050106 05:52]:
What is the target group of your diagramm?
I wanted to visualize the deb lifecycle for my understanding of 'the
debian way'. So I was the 'target'. I asked for comments here and there
to fill in missing bits. And once I did it, I
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050107 19:46]:
Yes, a legend for the acronyms would be fine.
Oh, I just saw, that your diagramm has a legend. I'm wondering, why I
didn't noticed it the other day..
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|| On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500
|| Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
km Hi Folks,
km I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
km appreciated!
IMHO have one wrong information on that. When the package go to
experimental, it comes from DD .deb like when it
On (06/01/05 01:56), Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi Kevin!
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050103 07:08]:
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
What is the target group of your diagramm? Since I don't think people
without deeper
Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a
nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) )
I'd suggest
Hi Kevin!
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050103 07:08]:
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
What is the target group of your diagramm? Since I don't think people
without deeper knowledge of Debian will find your diagram easy to
understand
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:56:13AM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi Kevin!
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050103 07:08]:
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
What is the target group of your diagramm?
Hi Alexander,
I wanted to
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:38:46PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
It's volatile, not volitile
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Also, the source is *.fig. Can anyone point to a similar
.deb of a graphic document so that I can see what documents a graphics
file needs so that I can make a GPL DFSG compliant package. I exported
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
It's volatile, not volitile
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49
27 matches
Mail list logo
