Re: very confused

1998-12-19 Thread Thomas Adams
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 08:57:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have there been duplicates? I suppose that you first need to move your mailfile /var/spool/mail/my_account to your $HOME and then start formail/procmail as procmail appends the mails while cat reads them again and again?!

very confused

1998-12-15 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi all, I am very confused. please help. I am trying to filt my current mail to different folders. In pine, I have about 200 old mails... so I did cat /var/spool/mail/my_account | formail -s procmail. All of sudden, it filts out over 5000 thousands

Re: very confused

1998-12-15 Thread alexander.schwartz
Have there been duplicates? I suppose that you first need to move your mailfile /var/spool/mail/my_account to your $HOME and then start formail/procmail as procmail appends the mails while cat reads them again and again?! Alex. On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Shao Zhang wrote: Hi all, I am very

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-09 Thread Ed Cogburn
Martin Waller wrote: Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian . I did but was still confused :( It didn't say *why* we have an apparent fork in compiler development. Since the gcc compiler is at the core of Linux (behind only the kernel itself in importance), having a semi-permanent

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-09 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 00:13:16 -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote: Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian . It didn't say *why* we have an apparent fork in compiler development. It doesn't contain a full history of the free software movement either, as that's out of scope for that document too. Since the

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-09 Thread Martin Waller
Subject: Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Waller) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:30:50 +1100 (EST) Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org From: Jiri Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Over the weekend, I downlaoded V 1.20 onto /usr/local/. Did the same last

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-08 Thread Jiri Baum
Hello, Over the weekend, I downlaoded V 1.20 onto /usr/local/. Did the same last night. I tried compiling it and after finding out that I needed all the OpenGl stuff and isntalling that to (V. annoying by the way - had even to edit some of the source code to get rid of those probelms) I

g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-07 Thread Martin Waller
Hi, I am stunningly confused about the whole c and c++ suite thing that's going on (I'm still in HAMM - it's *not * the __register_frame_info stuff!). Here's my story and a plea for a clear explanation of what's what and what I need to compile kernels, c++ toolkits and stuff. Over the

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-07 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Mon, Dec 07, 1998 at 01:50:48 -0800, Martin Waller wrote: I am stunningly confused about the whole c and c++ suite thing that's going on (I'm still in HAMM - it's *not * the __register_frame_info stuff!). Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian . Being naive enough to try anything, and having

Re: g++2.8, egcs, gcc 2.7.2, etc. - *very confused*

1998-12-07 Thread Martin Waller
Read /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian . I did but was still confused :( Being naive enough to try anything, and having heard of all sorts of problems with egcs and g++, I decided to scrap g++2.8 and put g++2.7.2 on. (I had egcs 2.90.29, dated 19980515). g++2.7.2 is intended only for compiling