On Tuesday 07 February 2006 05:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600
>
>Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was
>> because it appears my machine is now using avahi, since I did an
>> apt-get upgrade the other d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 02:07:04 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600
> Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was
> > because it appears my machine is now using
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600
Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was
> because it appears my machine is now using avahi, since I did an
> apt-get upgrade the other day.)
These are unrelated things. Avahi provides "a framework for
On Friday 03 February 2006 12:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> >Well, I've no clue :(. But I can suggest that you might want to do
>> > away with quotas and I've no clue what the idmapd does. Can you
>> > get a regular old /etc/exports file to work with
>> > nfs-kernel-server?
>>
>> H
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:57:08 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 01:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service nfs restart
> >> Shutting down NFS mountd: [FAILED]
> >> Shutting down NFS
On Friday 03 February 2006 01:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[...]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service nfs restart
>> Shutting down NFS mountd: [FAILED]
>> Shutting down NFS daemon: [FAILED]
>> Shutting down NFS quotas:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:59:20 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:35, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500
> >
> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:05, Jacob S wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:06:26 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> >maybe there is a setting in fam.conf that is ty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:06:26 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >maybe there is a setting in fam.conf that is tying up the shares?
>
> Maybe, I just found one that w
On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
>> >
>> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:35, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
>> >
>> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
> >
> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >Gre
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
> >
> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >Gre
On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >Greetings;
>>
>> And no one has any comments to make on this?
>
>not a clue. why samba and
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >Greetings;
>
> And no one has any comments to make on this?
not a clue. why samba and not nfs?
FWIW, I killed fam, and
> things seem to be working more or
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
>Greetings;
And no one has any comments to make on this? FWIW, I killed fam, and
things seem to be working more or less normally here. Killing fam
allowed me to umount those shares. This is required because I have a
script (cron) that r
Greetings;
I have a machine out in the workshop that I occasionally mount via a
samba share. Its a debian variant, hence this posting to both lists.
At present, no shells are logged into it, nor any utilities are open to
the share known as /mnt/shop-slash on this machine.
But if I try to umoun
17 matches
Mail list logo
