:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive
and more energy
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:08 +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals,
and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or
referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know
except acroread, are
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:19:27PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
Umm... what exactly is wrong with xpdf? I use it routinely, authoring
and refereeing. I find it light and fast. evince works too, though I
find xpdf faster. I do not understand your problem.
You can also look at okular. I am
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Drew Parsons dpars...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:08 +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals,
and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or
referee, neither the
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:04 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Drew Parsons dpars...@debian.org wrote:
what exactly is wrong with xpdf? I use it routinely, authoring
and refereeing. I find it light and fast. evince works too, though I
find xpdf faster.
Francesco Pietra:
Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals,
and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or
referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know
except acroread, are enough.
You don't mention which features the
Drew Parsons wrote:
Yeah, I'm not so fond of evince myself. I particularly despise the way
it hides its own identity, calling itself Document Viewer (*which*
document viewer??!!) But that's more of a systemic problem with Gnome
than with evince.
Checkout epdfview, basically evince without
Francesco Pietra:
Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals,
and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or
referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know
except acroread, are enough.
You can use Adobe Reader for Linux
* Francesco Pietra:
Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals,
and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or
referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know
except acroread, are enough. Because of these problems (which are
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive
and more energy demanding
They moved to non-free, see http://debian-multimedia.org/.
--
enzotib
2010/2/28 Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla
Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com writes:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We
Francesco Pietra wrote:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:30:32 +0100, Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 06:40:14PM -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:30:32 +0100, Francesco Pietra chiendar...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
vi lovers and minimalists should look into apvlv for yet another GTK
alternative:
http://code.google.com/p/apvlv/
And since we're talking about squeeze:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/apvlv
-thib
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
...@gmail.com:
What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain
a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why
acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on
debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive
and more
17 matches
Mail list logo
