On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:23:02 +0600, Aft nix wrote:
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
Yes, there are.
And they can be fed-trained from your input :-)
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster
I've accidentally replied one of them, no 100's mails are flodding my
Hi all,
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
I've accidentally replied one of them, no 100's mails are flodding my mailbox.
I know its me who acted stupid, but still, a spam filter would have been nice.
--
-aft
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 18:23:02 +0600, Aft nix wrote:
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
We would all notice if spam filtering on the list was non-existent.
I've accidentally replied one of them, no 100's mails are flodding my mailbox.
How does one accidentally
-aft writes:
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
Yes. At least 99% of the mail that hits the servers is rejected as
spam.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:23:02 +0600
Aft nix aft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aft,
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
No there aren't. If the were no spam filtering there would be,
literally, hundreds of spam mails to the list every day.
I've accidentally replied one
On 6/2/2012 8:39 AM, John Hasler wrote:
-aft writes:
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
Yes. At least 99% of the mail that hits the servers is rejected as
spam.
At least 99% ?!?! Umm, my math sux but...
--
Keep well,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
And, not to put too fine a point on it (and why I try not to respond),
but a handful of spams will also generate tens or hundreds of mails
from members of the list arguing the existence or the efficiency of
the spam filters on the list.
Just an observation,
--b
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:24 AM,
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:23:02 +0600
Aft nix aft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aft,
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
No there aren't. If the were no spam filtering there would be,
literally,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:57:28 +0600
Aft nix aft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aft,
I'm taking full responsibility of my actions.
In which case, I misread the tone of your post.
i'm talking about the subsequent spams, probably generated from same
source. I'm just checking that same kind of
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:57:28 +0600
Aft nix aft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aft,
I'm taking full responsibility of my actions.
In which case, I misread the tone of your post.
Thanks for the understanding.
i'm talking
On Saturday 02 June 2012 15:39:43 Aft nix wrote:
Spam filters aren't prescient; They can't predict new spam types.
Filtering is always playing catch-up. It will take time (IDK how much)
for the filters to be taught how to recognise this model.
May be i should report the spam instead of
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:43:23AM -0500, Chris wrote:
On 6/2/2012 8:39 AM, John Hasler wrote:
-aft writes:
So many spams are directed to this list. Any spam filter there?
Yes. At least 99% of the mail that hits the servers is rejected as
spam.
At least 99% ?!?! Umm, my math sux
12 matches
Mail list logo
