Andrei POPESCU Said:
[re-wrapped to 72 characters]
-
Sorry about that, I send list mails from my cell phone, very small screen, not
much I can do about the text length.
Otherwise thank you for the reply. Just curious, are the 32bit Libraries that
can be installed upon need in a 64bit ins
On Sb, 04 iun 11, 05:46:56, teddi...@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
>
> Ron Johnson Said:
>
> The M2V has an AM2 socket, and all such chips are 64-bit capable, so
> both 2.6.39-1-686-pae and 2.6.39-1-amd64 *should* work.
>
> (I think you'd get a different error if the kernel was incompatible with
> t
Ron Johnson Said:
The M2V has an AM2 socket, and all such chips are 64-bit capable, so
both 2.6.39-1-686-pae and 2.6.39-1-amd64 *should* work.
(I think you'd get a different error if the kernel was incompatible with
the CPU.)
The first thing I noticed about these two Kernels was the one i
On 06/03/2011 07:11 AM, Thomas Milne wrote:
Hello all,
I just assembled a system with an M2V motherboard and Sempron processor,
with Nvidia graphics card. I installed Debian Squeeze, then upgraded to
unstable. Installed nvidia-glx, nvidia dkms, a new kernel and headers.
The kernel that was inst
Hello all,
I just assembled a system with an M2V motherboard and Sempron processor,
with Nvidia graphics card. I installed Debian Squeeze, then upgraded to
unstable. Installed nvidia-glx, nvidia dkms, a new kernel and headers.
The kernel that was installed with Squeeze was 2.6.32-5-686 which work
If you have 2.6 and the Alsa drivers, it all works well - just make sure you
edit settings with the 'alsamixer'.
You'll probably find that everything is working but your headphone channel is
muted. With OSS I have no idea what setting to change (or if this is even
possible). It is also possi
John Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the impending move of etch to stable, I have a question on how to
> do the upgrade. I am running sarge with the 2.4.25-1-386 kernel. I
> understand that etch requires the 2.6.x kernel. This would imply that I
> have a kernel upgrade in my future.
With the impending move of etch to stable, I have a question on how to
do the upgrade. I am running sarge with the 2.4.25-1-386 kernel. I
understand that etch requires the 2.6.x kernel. This would imply that I
have a kernel upgrade in my future. Do I want to do that upgrade on
sarge? Will th
Javier Bernal wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I want to know which of the modules that 'lsmod' shows I am currently
> using.
>
> lsmod shows 42 modules. Are all of them being used?
>
> Can I see which device is using which module?
>
> Thanks
>
Your best bet here is to install the kernel documentatio
Adam Funk wrote:
On 2006-03-24, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The third column of lsmod's output tells you if a module is being used.
Take a look in /proc to find out what process is using a particular module.
Get info. about the lsmod command and proc filesy
Ivan Glushkov wrote:
lsmod for me is always showing that no module is used, which is
defenetely not true (for example for the driver modules). So, how do I
see that for those modules?
There are periods of time when certain modules are not used; for
example, I'm offline right now, so lsmod t
Javier Bernal wrote:
Is there any command that show me what module is being used by a device?
> How can I view which process is using which module in /proc?
>
I don't know of a program to do this. You might try "aptitude search
'~dmodule'" or "aptitude search proc".
Look at the output from d
On 2006-03-24, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The third column of lsmod's output tells you if a module is being used.
> Take a look in /proc to find out what process is using a particular module.
>
> Get info. about the lsmod command and proc filesystem;
> $ man
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
Javier Bernal wrote:
Hello list,
I want to know which of the modules that 'lsmod' shows I am currently
using.
lsmod shows 42 modules. Are all of them being used?
Can I see which device is using which module?
Thanks
The third column of lsmod's
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) escribió:
Javier Bernal wrote:
Hello list,
I want to know which of the modules that 'lsmod' shows I am currently
using.
lsmod shows 42 modules. Are all of them being used?
Can I see which device is using which module?
Thanks
The third column of lsm
Javier Bernal wrote:
Hello list,
I want to know which of the modules that 'lsmod' shows I am currently
using.
lsmod shows 42 modules. Are all of them being used?
Can I see which device is using which module?
Thanks
The third column of lsmod's output tells you if a module is being used.
Hello list,
I want to know which of the modules that 'lsmod' shows I am currently using.
lsmod shows 42 modules. Are all of them being used?
Can I see which device is using which module?
Thanks
--
^v^
Javier BernalDto. Técnico de Sistemas.
I've seen it mentioned in mailing list archives online, but none of them
mention what kernel option(s) it uses.
Anyone know what the options are?
Many thanks.
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tripolar wrote:
package listing on debian is down.
I am using
Linux version 2.4.22-1-386 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2
20030908 (Debian prerelease)) #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003
cpu- AMD 2700+ Athlon
ABIT NF7
Nvidia chipset
Nvidia Nforce2
I want to recompile or try new kernel ( if it w
package listing on debian is down.
I am using
Linux version 2.4.22-1-386 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2
20030908 (Debian prerelease)) #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003
cpu- AMD 2700+ Athlon
ABIT NF7
Nvidia chipset
Nvidia Nforce2
I want to recompile or try new kernel ( if it would be better)
Hi,
I'm wondering what kernel gets installed when installing (simple method)
Debian from cd. I.e where it resides on the cd. Is it the 'linux' in /install
or the one in the image /boot/rescue.bin? Or where might I find information
on this?
Thanks, Pontus
Kent West wrote:
[...]
>
> However, when I actually tried to play any sound, no sound came out of
> the speakers. I've tried both "saytime" and "splay [some .mp3 file];
> both tests pause the cursor at the command prompt like the system is
> busy running a program, and then eventually returns lik
Kent West wrote:
computer with integrated AC'97 "SoundMax" using either OSS or alsa>
(Now, does this mean I'm going to have to temporarily move a Windows
drive into the box to test the sound [to make sure it's not a "win-
soundsystem, like a "win-modem" or "win-printer"]? Yuck!)
With gre
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
Kent West wrote:
[...]
So I ran through it again, this time with a "2> error.log" appended, and
this time putting in "100" on the three questions about frame size,etc.
Here's the contents of error.log:
touch: creating `/etc/alsa/modutils/0.5': No such file or direct
Kent West wrote:
> [...]
>
> So I ran through it again, this time with a "2> error.log" appended, and
> this time putting in "100" on the three questions about frame size,etc.
> Here's the contents of error.log:
> > touch: creating `/etc/alsa/modutils/0.5': No such file or directory
> > grep: /etc
Kent West wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > integrated sound on a Gateway E3400 using ALSA>
I got rid of anything I could find dealing with alsa, both via
apt/dselect and my earlier attempt at manually compiling/installing the
modules.
Then used apt-get to install the alsa-source package.
Then I veri
Kent West wrote:
>
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> >
> > Kent West wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kent West wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > integrated sound on a Gateway E3400 using ALSA>
> Okay; I installed alsa-source. During the config phase it asked what
> card I wanted to build; I told it "inte
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
>
> Kent West wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Kent West wrote:
> >
> > > > > integrated sound on a Gateway E3400 using ALSA>
> >
> > Andrea replied:
> >
> > > You don't say if you added in the /etc/modutils the requested aliases for
> > > your sound
> > > card, mine where cr
Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> > Kent West wrote:
>
> > > integrated sound on a Gateway E3400 using ALSA>
>
> Andrea replied:
>
> > You don't say if you added in the /etc/modutils the requested aliases for
> > your sound
> > card, mine where created quite correctly by alsaconf, but i remember well,
mike polniak wrote:
Kent West wrote:
/Rant
At any rate, I'm getting really frustrated, and am about to give up on
getting sound to work on my new computer with Debian. I'm not giving up
on Debian by any means, but it is making me feel less gung-ho to
recommend it to newbies like I've been d
Kent West wrote:
> /Rant
> At any rate, I'm getting really frustrated, and am about to give up on
> getting sound to work on my new computer with Debian. I'm not giving up
> on Debian by any means, but it is making me feel less gung-ho to
> recommend it to newbies like I've been doing. :-( Con
Kent West wrote:
Andrea replied:
You don't say if you added in the /etc/modutils the requested aliases for your
sound
card, mine where created quite correctly by alsaconf, but i remember well, in
the
sound card definition the name of my sound card was missing. I attach my alias
file
a
Kent West wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
>
> > Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet machine.
> >> I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
> >> for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
> >>
> >>
Kent West wrote:
I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet
machine.
I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
for sound.
It's an "AC'97 soft audio using ADI 1881" setup (according to Gateway
tech support). According to the ALSA mini-HOWTO
Kent West wrote:
I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet
machine.
I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
VMWare is now working.
I then, as per the instructions (ALSA mini-HOWTO)
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
Kent West wrote:
I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet machine.
I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
The only info I've found so far on the sound, which
Kent West wrote:
I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet
machine. I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working
well except for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
The only info I've found so far on the sound, which is integrated, is
that i
Kent West wrote:
> I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet machine.
> I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
> for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
>
> The only info I've found so far on the sound, which is integrated, is
>
I just got blessed with a Gateway E-3400 933MHz PIII box; sweet machine.
I've recompiled a new 2.4.2 kernel and everything's working well except
for sound and vmware (I'll worry about vmware later).
The only info I've found so far on the sound, which is integrated, is
that it is "Sound Max Dig
I need some of the new features of the 2.4 serries of kernels, but I also need a
stable reliable system.
Would I be better off installing a system from teh "testing" distribution, or
installling "stable", and upgradeing the kernel? I specificly need large file
(> 2
G) support, but I alos want to
40 matches
Mail list logo
