I'm running an unstable system and I need remote access by
ssh. Stable is considered better for servers (but I need
unstable for newer versions of a lot of packages on my
workstation), testing gets security updates last, but
unstable has a higher version number of ssh. it safer to
run the stable
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:00:17PM +0200, Anonymous said
I'm running an unstable system and I need remote access by
ssh. Stable is considered better for servers (but I need
unstable for newer versions of a lot of packages on my
workstation), testing gets security updates last, but
unstable
Em Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:20:09 +0200, Anonymous escreveu:
it safer to run
the stable ssh (1:3.4p1-1.woody.3) or the unstable one (1:3.8.1p1-8)?
Stable is more mature, with unstable we never know what errors
may be yet lurking...
--
Leandro Guimares Faria Corcete Dutra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3 matches
Mail list logo