Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> $ ls -al /usr/bin/w
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 11 2014 /usr/bin/w -> /etc/alternatives/w
> $ ls -al /etc/alternatives/w
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Feb 11 2014 /etc/alternatives/w ->
> /usr/bin/w.procps
> $ w -V
> w f
$ ls -al /usr/bin/w
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 11 2014 /usr/bin/w -> /etc/alternatives/w
$ ls -al /etc/alternatives/w
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Feb 11 2014 /etc/alternatives/w ->
/usr/bin/w.procps
$ w -V
w from procps-ng 3.3.10
$ who --version
who (GNU coreutils) 8.23
also "who --lookup" mak
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:32:16PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> > >
> > > > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> >
> > > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> > > default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
>
> > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> > default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
> > flag to make it do so.
>
> I'm trying
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
> flag to make it do so.
I'm trying to follow this, but it doesn't seem to square with my own
observations.
I've edi
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:18:34PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Reco wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:46:53AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > (I of course edited my own host's ip address here for 10.20.30.40)
> >
> >
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:46:53AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> (I of course edited my own host's ip address here for 10.20.30.40)
>
> But yes, getent resolves my host ip to a name. who/w/finger/last all still
> do not resolve the host.
Ok, then we'll have to do it the hard way.
Please
(I of course edited my own host's ip address here for 10.20.30.40)
But yes, getent resolves my host ip to a name. who/w/finger/last all still
do not resolve the host.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > Any i
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> Any idea why I'm NOT getting hostnames by default?
>
> $ who
> mgrant pts/1 2015-09-05 07:30 (10.20.30.40:S.1)
> mgrant pts/2 2015-09-05 07:30 (10.20.30.40:S.2)
> mgrant pts/3 2015-09-05 07:30 (10.20.
Any idea why I'm NOT getting hostnames by default?
$ who
mgrant pts/12015-09-05 07:30 (*10.20.30.40*:S.1)
mgrant pts/22015-09-05 07:30 (*10.20.30.40*:S.2)
mgrant pts/32015-09-05 07:30 (*10.20.30.40*:S.3)
mgrant pts/42015-09-05 07:30 (*10.20.30.40*:S.4)
$ w
On 05/09/15 23:21, Michael Grant wrote:
I have to say in some ways this seems like a feature not a bug! I've
long missed the option some other unixes have to inhibit resolving the
name. But at the moment the hostname! Frankly, there should be an
option to w, who, finger, and last to not resolv
I'm running debian testing. Just did an apt-get update. who, w, finger,
and last are all now printing the ip address instead of the hostname. the
wtmp seems to have the ip address now instead of the hostname. Last shows
hostnames up to when I did the apt-get update today and then ip addresses.
13 matches
Mail list logo
