Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:20:02 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Is there an ATI Debian package?
Yes, but only in unstable. The packages of interest are fglrx-driver
and fglrx-kernel-src. The latter can conveniently be built using
module-assistant. I use
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:04:58 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
...
The next thing I would check is that various symlinks in /usr/lib/
point to the fglrx libraries rather than the mesa ones. You should
at least look at /usr/lib/libGL.so* and
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:51:34 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:04:58 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
...
The next thing I would check is that various symlinks in /usr/lib/
point to the fglrx libraries rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:51:34 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:04:58 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
[snip]
now imagine this, it turns out that ATI
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:20:02 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Is there an ATI Debian package?
Yes, but only in unstable. The packages of interest are fglrx-driver
and fglrx-kernel-src. The latter can conveniently be built using
module-assistant. I use these on my Thinkpad,
thanks, seems like changing kernel config helped, still no cigar
though, xorg log says:
(II) fglrx(0): DRI initialization successfull!
and lsmod confirms that fglrx is loaded
but then fglrxinfo says:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
OpenGL
On 19/06/06, Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks, seems like changing kernel config helped, still no cigar
though, xorg log says:
(II) fglrx(0): DRI initialization successfull!
and lsmod confirms that fglrx is loaded
but then fglrxinfo says:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:16:15 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with the
latest xorg packages?
Yes. I have fglrx working with xorg and the stock Debian 686 kernel in
an up-to-date sid installation.
I installed fglrx
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:16:15 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with the
latest xorg packages?
Yes. I have fglrx working with xorg and the stock Debian 686 kernel in
an up-to-date sid installation.
...
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:19:38 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:16:15 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with
the latest xorg packages?
Yes. I have fglrx working
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:19:38 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:16:15 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with
the latest xorg packages?
Yes. I have
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:04:58 -0700
Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Do you load the GLcore module explicitly in the Module section
of xorg.conf? If so then remove that line.
no I don't, here's the module section of my xorg.conf:
Section Module
# erik: does not
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with the
latest xorg packages?
I installed fglrx packages (build the kernel module etc.) but it
doesn't seem to accept xorg 7:
(II) fglrx(0): UMM Bus area: 0xd0acb000 (size=0x07535000)
(II) fglrx(0): UMM area: 0xd0acb000
On 19/06/06, Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make ATI proprietary driver fglrx work with the
latest xorg packages?
I installed fglrx packages (build the kernel module etc.) but it
doesn't seem to accept xorg 7:
(II) fglrx(0): UMM Bus area: 0xd0acb000
14 matches
Mail list logo
