On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:52:11PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > if they went away .. we'd have to bitch about ati/matrox :-0
>
> We already had that argument. Matrox lost. And we had the ATI/3dfx
> d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:52:11PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> if they went away .. we'd have to bitch about ati/matrox :-0
We already had that argument. Matrox lost. And we had the ATI/3dfx
debate. 3dfx lost.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL P
hi ya
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:04:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've had the same thing; the drivers that I nabbed from nVidia have been
> > > rock-solid and quite functional, whereas the Debian packages...besides,
> > > why is it a 'cra
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 19:49
Subject: Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:04:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've had the same thing; the drivers that I nabbed from nVidia have been
> rock-solid and quite functional, whereas the Debian packages...besides,
> why is it a 'crap driver'?
The de
>
> --
> From: Sreelal Chandrasenan
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:25:22 AM
> To: Debian User (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
>
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
>
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
Interesting. I h
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
> On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
> > with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
>
>
>
> Interesting. I had l
On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
> with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
Interesting. I had lots of problems with the two debian packages, but have
had rock solid performanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> > with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
> Can someone tell me where I can find nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496 package for
> installing nvidia-glx?
- From building
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 09:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:46:11PM +, John Peter wrote:
> > I use the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run installer from NVidea and
> > just had to execute their instructions, by the letter an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:46:11PM +, John Peter wrote:
> I use the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run installer from NVidea and
> just had to execute their instructions, by the letter and everything
> runs OK.
That is the crap driver I'm talking
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
>> searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
>> drivers
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (
On Thursday December 11 at 06:35pm
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> > I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> > searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with
> > the ATI dr
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> > I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> > searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
> > drivers too, so I've decided to stick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
> drivers too, so I've decided to stick w
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
David Selby wrote:
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading,
X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manua
Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:30:55AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>
>> > Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and
>> >> for that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
>> upgrading, X w
On Thursday December 11 at 02:30am
Haim Ashkenazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I always put Nvidia in /etc/modules.
> for me it always worked without adding it to '/etc/modules'.
>
> any idea about the error?
No, I used to get an error about 'non-gpl code, tainted kernel' or some
such with 436
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:30:55AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> > Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
> >> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
> >> upgrading, X wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
> occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
> wouldn't start (error loading 'nv
David Selby wrote:
> Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>>that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading,
>>X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
>>manually, and then i
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
>> upgrading, X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe
>> 'nvidia' manually, and
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_re
On Wednesday December 10 at 03:24pm
Haim Ashkenazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and
> for that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
> upgrading, X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe
> 'nvid
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_reg
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_register(nvidiactl): cou
30 matches
Mail list logo
