Re: zlib1g vs zlib1g-dev (potato)

2000-09-26 Thread Mark Brown
will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 08:24:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:26:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: zlib1g-dev: Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.3-5) but 1:1.1.3-9 is to be installed Well, that's fairly self-explanatory.

Re: zlib1g vs zlib1g-dev (potato)

2000-09-25 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 08:24:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:26:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: zlib1g-dev: Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.3-5) but 1:1.1.3-9 is to be installed Well, that's fairly self-explanatory. not on the level i'm looking at...

Re: zlib1g vs zlib1g-dev (potato)

2000-09-25 Thread Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 08:24:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:26:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: zlib1g-dev: Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.3-5) but 1:1.1.3-9 is to be installed Well, that's fairly self-explanatory.

Re: zlib1g vs zlib1g-dev (potato)

2000-09-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:26:40PM -0500, will trillich wrote: zlib1g-dev: Depends: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.3-5) but 1:1.1.3-9 is to be installed Well, that's fairly self-explanatory. deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian potato main contrib non-free deb

zlib1g vs zlib1g-dev (potato)

2000-09-22 Thread will trillich
i've got two debian boxes recently fsckd and partitioned and installed via potato ISO cd roms. on one, i downloaded the vpnd tarball and did # ./configure # make and voila, no troubles. [vpnd from http://www.crosswinds.net/~anstein/unix/vpnd.html ] on the other debian box, i get