I have a sqeeze system running as (amongst lots of other things) a
mythtv backend/frontend combination.
Yesterday, after a long overdue aptitude update, I noticed the video
playing rather slow.
I had previously configured the nvidia kernel module to run because it
seem to perform better
Gabriela Jiménez wrote:
Dear Debian.Org Support Team:
I am a new user of Linux O.S., and I need to use Linux to use RDP
protocol to connect with a Server with Windows 2008 Server to use an
business application. Debian have a RDP tool similar to Windows RDP ?
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:02:33 +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2010 18:40:02 Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:16:42 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Why not? :-)
Because I'm seeing (one day and another, in this same list and in other
Debian lists) that Intel driver is
On 2010-12-20 18:58 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
I have a sqeeze system running as (amongst lots of other things) a
mythtv backend/frontend combination.
Yesterday, after a long overdue aptitude update, I noticed the video
playing rather slow.
I had previously configured the nvidia kernel
On 20/12/10 18:37, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-20 18:58 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
I had previously configured the nvidia kernel module to run because it
seem to perform better with mythtv
Was there an upgrade of nvidia-glx or the kernel? Also, do you use the
nvidia-* packages from
Alexander Batischev wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:41:48PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Do you mean that there is no way to keep the same name for the time it
lasts a release?
Excuse me for intervening, but no, he does not mean that. You see, you can
look at codenames (like 'etch', 'lenny' or
Hi,
I have a problem with my Debian Lenny server.
I have a SMB/CIF connection to NetApp storage. On the storage space is about
250Gb of files.
When I run the following command to remove the files, in the root of mounted
directory, rm -R *
This causes the server to reboot. Today using
Curt Howland wrote:
Is there a way to do a file system check on a UDF disk?
Next, while I realize that UDF spreads the writes around and makes
the disks last longer, I am using them for long-term archive rather
than something like a daily backup. Is there a reason anyone can
think of for not
On 2010-12-20 19:51 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 20/12/10 18:37, Sven Joachim wrote:
This is pretty normal, although you should specify the nvidia driver in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf, preventing all the probing of other drivers in the
first place. Do you even have an xorg.conf?
No xorg.conf, so
On 12/20/2010 09:13 PM, will ryder wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with my Debian Lenny server.
I have a SMB/CIF connection to NetApp storage. On the storage space is about
250Gb of files.
When I run the following command to remove the files, in the root of mounted
directory, rm -R *
This
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:16:42 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 17:42 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:25:02 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
The vesa driver won't work with Kernel Mode Setting (which is mandatory
for current Intel driver versions), the
will ryder wrote:
I have a SMB/CIF connection to NetApp storage. On the storage space is about
250Gb of files.
When I run the following command to remove the files, in the root of mounted directory, rm -R *
This causes the server to reboot. Today using konqueror when I looked at the
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:45:55 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:56:55 -0500, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:25:55 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-19 20:56 +0100, Celejar wrote:
Running uptodate Sid. I usually run self-compiled
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:59 -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
(...)
This was an interesting error during my efforts:
=
# fsck /dev/sr0
fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2
fsck: fsck.udf: not found
fsck: Error 2 while executing fsck.udf for /dev/sr0
=
Is there a way to do a file system
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:02:33 +0100
Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
...
Well, I don't want to start a war, but I have machines with Intel, nvidia
and
ati graphic card. Intel one has proved to be the stable one over the past two
and a half years. And it was going to be a must for
Atif CEYLAN wrote:
Hi,
what the kernel logs say? If you send us look at the /var/log/syslog
, /var/log/dmesg and /var/log/kern.log logs.
Might also be worth opening a console window, or attaching a serial
console (if you can) - some kinds of kernel panics will never make it to
a log file, but
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:18:25 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 18:40 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:16:42 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-20 17:42 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
Hummm, I wouldn't like to have an Intel VGA chipset nowadays O:-)
On 2010-12-20 21:55 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:18:25 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
- Black screen when the i915 kernel module loads. This happened even to
me some day¹, but the kernel developers are shaking out the KMS bugs,
so this should become less of
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:50:42 -0500, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:45:55 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
By reading your xorg log error, I see two problems here:
Thanks for the help (as always!), but you may be confusing two different
problems. The X log is from my initial problem,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:15:43 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 04:56 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:25:55 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-19 20:56 +0100, Celejar wrote:
Running uptodate Sid. I usually run self-compiled
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:14:12 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 21:55 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:18:25 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
- Black screen when the i915 kernel module loads. This happened even to
me some day¹, but the
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:14:09 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:50:42 -0500, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:45:55 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
...
1/ Intel driver is failing (not normal but users are accustomed to
this)
Accustomed?!
On 2010-12-20 22:17 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:15:43 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
This may be due to the use of a framebuffer in grub2, or because
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE is not set in the kernel configuration. For
the former, try to disable the framebuffer
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:35:55 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 22:17 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:15:43 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
This may be due to the use of a framebuffer in grub2, or because
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE is not set
On 2010-12-20 22:52 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:35:55 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Is CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DETECT_PRIMARY set?
No - should it be? The help says 'if unsure, select n', so I figured
it was best left off, since I'm certainly not sure ;)
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:28:52 -0500 (EST), Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
...
I have been able to circumvent the problem
by commenting out the following entries in /etc/fstab and rebooting:
/dev/fd0 /media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:44:35 -0500 (EST), Rick Thomas wrote:
On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
Caution: reformatting a swap partition with mkswap will change the
uuid unless the existing one is explicitly re-specified during
formatting.
Which raises a question that has
On 20101220_173710, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:44:35 -0500 (EST), Rick Thomas wrote:
On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
Caution: reformatting a swap partition with mkswap will change the
uuid unless the existing one is explicitly re-specified during
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:11:59 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-20 22:52 +0100, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:35:55 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
Is CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DETECT_PRIMARY set?
No - should it be? The help says 'if unsure,
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
having actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer.
And there does appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the
goofy naming system which throws the novice?
--
Jim Pazarena deb...@paz.bz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi ,
On 21/12/10 10:18, Jim Pazarena wrote:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
having actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer.
And there does appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the
goofy naming system which throws the novice?
do you really
Jim Pazarena wrote:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
It isn't just Debian. Most of the software distributions use names
for their releases *in addition to* the version numbering just like
Debian does. Debian isn't unique here. Just like car companies name
their car
Jim Pazarena wrote:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS? having
actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer. And there does
appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the goofy naming system
which throws the novice?
This was all fought out on debian-devel
Jim Pazarena said:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
having actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer.
And there does appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the
goofy naming system which throws the novice?
-
Windows 98, 2000 Pro., ME, XP, Vista,
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 18:18 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
having actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer.
And there does appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the
goofy naming system which throws the novice?
Don't
Thanks all. I tried toying with udev to create a persistent node name,
but to no avail. The problem seem to be that the hdd is periodically
disconnecting. By the time it has disconnected, it is too late. Md has
already faulted the device. If anyone has any ideas about preventing the
drive from
On 12/20/2010 20:45, Petrus Validus wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 18:18 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
what possessed the debian people to tack names on to the OS?
having actual version/release numbers seems so much clearer.
And there does appear to BE release numbers. So why promote the
goofy
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 06:58:55AM +0200, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
Thanks all. I tried toying with udev to create a persistent node name,
but to no avail. The problem seem to be that the hdd is periodically
disconnecting. By the time it has disconnected, it is too late. Md has
already
Hmm, it seems to be a power issue. I had a usb hub connected to the same
bus and I disconnected it. Since then there have been no problems.
Regards,
Panayiotis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:58:55 +0200, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
Thanks all. I tried toying with udev to create a persistent node name,
but to no avail. The problem seem to be that the hdd is periodically
disconnecting. By the time it has disconnected, it is too late. Md has
already faulted
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
