Re: besoin de conseil installation ssd + hdd

Le 30/12/2017 à 20:48, rand...@free.fr a écrit : De quelle zone s'agit-il ? De la zone définie par HPA quand cette fonction est activée, située entre la fin apparente définie par hdparm -N et la taille totale. De quoi croyais-tu qu'on parlait ? Dans ton précédent message tu conseillais de

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On 12/29/2017 3:02 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote: On Friday, 29 Dec 2017 at 06:30, john doe wrote: [...] I had rongly assumed that you were trying to install buster packages into stretch, so '-t buster' is clearly not needed. Sorry, should have made myself more clear. Yes, I'm already at buster.

Re: besoin de conseil installation ssd + hdd

Le 30/12/2017 à 21:57, rand...@free.fr a écrit : From: "Gaëtan Perrier" Tous les SSD font de l'overprovisionning nativement. Quand un fabricant indique une taille de disque c'est la taille utilisable mais en fait le SSD contient plus de mémoire flash. En effet.

Precarious status of Shutter in Debian

Hello Debian is moving away from Gnome2::VFS [1] . This obsolete module will be removed from next release of Debian. Unfortunately, shutter, a very nice Gtk2 screenshot application, depends on Gnome::VFS, which means that shutter will be removed from Debian unless this dependency is removed

apt-cacher-ng / autoclean

Hi folks, I am a little bit stuck. I am regularly building a livefile system (kali-linux) and using apt-cacher- ng, so that I do not need to download all the packages over and over again. But the local repo is growing more and more, and as I want to get rid of all old packages, I wanted to

Re: apt-cacher-ng / autoclean

Hello, first of all there is an management page (http://yourhost:3142) and there are also config options see https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~bloch/acng/html/maint.html#maint Best Regards, On 31.12.2017 11:24, Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am a little bit stuck. > > I am regularly building a

Re: apt-cacher-ng / autoclean

On Sunday, 31 December 2017 11:24:30 CET Hans wrote: > What must I do, if this is possible at all? apt-cacher-ng provides a web page to perform maintenance. Open with your favorite browser the page: http://replace-with-your-cache-host:3142/acng-report.html For more details, see

Re: apt-cacher-ng / autoclean

Am Sonntag, 31. Dezember 2017, 11:54:12 CET schrieb Dominique Dumont: Hi Dominique, thanks for the information. The manual was not quite clear for me, what it wants. With your example below, I understood what to do. It was not clear for me, that I must use a browser, and thought, a commandline

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 16:26:48 +, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 16:07, Brian wrote: > > On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 15:53:14 +, Eric S Fraga wrote: > >> But apt-get does not? I've only started using apt instead of apt-cache > >> and apt-get recently so I'm not up to speed on

Re: Debian 9.3 GUI installation failure

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 10:10:31 (+), w f wrote: > I tried installing Debian 9.3 today. I used the netinst CD amd64 > version.All was going well until about 4/5ths of the way through ...I > suddenly got an error message about "ispell" and that something > "british" couldn't be installed.(I chose

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

David Christensen wrote: > On 12/30/17 14:38, Matthew Crews wrote: >> The main issue I see with using BTRFS with MDADM is that you lose the >> benefit of bit-rot repair. MDADM can't correct bit rot, but >> BTRFS-Raid (and ZFS raid arrays) can, but only with native raid

Bonne année 3018 Debian User French

Bonne année. Mes voeux, en ligne : https://www.visionduweb.eu/28-accueil-visionduweb/le-projet-visionduweb/177-vision-du-web-vous-souhaite-une-bonne-annee-2018

Re: Debian 9.3 GUI installation failure

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 10:10:31 +, w f wrote: > I tried installing Debian 9.3 today. I used the netinst CD amd64 version.All > was going well until about 4/5ths of the way through ...I suddenly got an > error message about "ispell" and that something "british" couldn't be > installed.(I chose

Re: Debian 9.3 GUI installation failure

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 20:37:06 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 10:10:31 +, w f wrote: > > > I tried installing Debian 9.3 today. I used the netinst CD amd64 version.All > > was going well until about 4/5ths of the way through ...I suddenly got an > > error message about

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

On 12/31/17 09:44, Sven Hartge wrote: David Christensen wrote: On 12/30/17 14:38, Matthew Crews wrote: The main issue I see with using BTRFS with MDADM is that you lose the benefit of bit-rot repair. MDADM can't correct bit rot, but BTRFS-Raid (and ZFS raid

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

The reason Redhat dropped btrfs support is because it currently has no native cryptographic function. And from the various threads I've read on the topic there is no easy answer to the problem. On 1 January 2018 at 06:44, Sven Hartge wrote: > David Christensen

Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

David Christensen wrote: > On 12/31/17 09:44, Sven Hartge wrote: >> David Christensen wrote: >>> On 12/30/17 14:38, Matthew Crews wrote: The main issue I see with using BTRFS with MDADM is that you lose the benefit of bit-rot

Clef 2.4G Wireless Serial

Bonsoir, quelqu'un a-t-il une piste pour utiliser une clef Winbond Electronics Corp. destinée à la communication série en 2.4G un lsub indique ceci : Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0416: Winbond Electronics Corp.   bDeviceClass    0 (Defined at Interface level)   bDeviceProtocol

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 15:53:14 +, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 15:25, Brian wrote: > > > Note that, by default, apt deletes files in archives after downloading > > and installing them. > > But apt-get does not? I've only started using apt instead of apt-cache > and

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 16:07, Brian wrote: > On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 15:53:14 +, Eric S Fraga wrote: >> But apt-get does not? I've only started using apt instead of apt-cache >> and apt-get recently so I'm not up to speed on the differences. > > /usr/share/doc/apt/NEWS.Debian.gz. Thanks.

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 11:02, john doe wrote: > Actually, your subject line was explicit enough! :) Indeed! ;-) > It looks like in your case your package index files were some how corrupted. > That's why cleaning and updating did the trick! :) > As recommended by the below URL 'apt-get

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sun 31 Dec 2017 at 14:57:56 +, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 11:02, john doe wrote: > > Actually, your subject line was explicit enough! :) > > Indeed! ;-) > > > It looks like in your case your package index files were some how corrupted. > > That's why cleaning and

Re: installing ufraw on buster

On Sunday, 31 Dec 2017 at 15:25, Brian wrote: [...] > Which is why the adice to delete only pkgcache.bin and srcpkgcache.bin > was given :). Yes but I had done 'apt-get clean' by then unfortunately! > As a matter of interest, how do the sizes of those files > compare with what you had

tigervnc and multiple users

Happy New Year to the list! I use tigervnc on Stretch to provide remote access to my machine from a variety of devices. I'm running VNC over an OpenVPN VPN but I don't THINK that is relevant to the problem. If I start tigervnc as the same user I log into Gnome as, I have no problem. I find I

happy new year 2018

fortunes ref : Requesting for help (fortunes) thanks to edua...@kalinowski.com.br for his #436. Style Excuse Server : outage BOFH excuse #3:electromagnetic radiation from satellite debris BOFH excuse #10:hardware stress fractures BOFH excuse #14:sounds like a Windows problem, try calling

Nettoyage du spam : décembre 2017

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en janvier, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de décembre 2017 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

How to relocate LVM pv to make room for grub install

Upgrading a workstation from Jessie to Stretch I found that the original disk partitioning left insufficient space for grub (re)install. The system has two identical ~233 GiB disks, sda and sdb, partitioned identically: Disk /dev/sda: 232.9 GiB, 250059350016 bytes, 488397168 sectors Units: