Peter Wiersig writes:
>
> I would be pissed if my OS removes snapshots I might or might not need
> in the future. That's a release critical bug in my eyes. Yeah, I know
> Microsoft and Apple do that automatically if your capacity runs out, but
> that's also why I don't recommend them at all.
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 08:18 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 12/04/2019 à 22:46, Thomas D Dial a écrit :
> > In terms of management, it is a major advance over physical
> > partitioning
> > for the file systems and, depending on particular file system
> > characteristics, allows you to get out
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 08:26 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 12/04/2019 à 22:25, Thomas D Dial a écrit :
> > I let the installer partition the USB key that was the install
> > target
> > and picked LVM, but specified distinct /, /usr/, /var, /home, and
> > swap
>
> Why did you create a distinct
Felix Miata wrote:
> Anders Andersson composed on 2019-04-13 17:31 (UTC+0200):
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> Because of its snapshotting, BTRFS requires considerably more space than
>>> older filesystems, as much as double.
>
>> A btrfs snapshot takes approximately zero space. Where did you
On 4/13/19 5:40 PM, Peter Wiersig wrote:
> Peter Wiersig writes:
>>
>> I would be pissed if my OS removes snapshots I might or might not need
>> in the future. That's a release critical bug in my eyes. Yeah, I know
>> Microsoft and Apple do that automatically if your capacity runs out, but
>>
Felix Miata writes:
> Anders Andersson composed on 2019-04-13 17:31 (UTC+0200):
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> Because of its snapshotting, BTRFS requires considerably more space than
>>> older
>>> filesystems, as much as double.
>
>> A btrfs snapshot takes approximately zero space. Where did
Le 12/04/2019 à 22:46, Thomas D Dial a écrit :
In terms of management, it is a major advance over physical partitioning
for the file systems and, depending on particular file system
characteristics, allows you to get out of space problems without down
time in many cases (online resizing is
Le 12/04/2019 à 22:25, Thomas D Dial a écrit :
I let the installer partition the USB key that was the install target
and picked LVM, but specified distinct /, /usr/, /var, /home, and swap
Why did you create a distinct volume for /usr ?
partitions and left some empty space within the LVM
I found a temporary solution that at least lets me visit the sites in Firefox.
However this doesn't fix OpenSSL (thus things like curl, wget).
#!/usr/bin/env bash
sudo apt-get install libnss3-tools
downloadCerts=(http://cacerts.thawte.com/ThawteRSACA2018.crt
Hi,
I had trouble visiting these two websites in Firefox, Epiphany and
verifying with OpenSSL.
- Births Deaths and Marriages (Government of South Australia)
https://bdm.cbs.sa.gov.au/bdmsaonline/dbweb.asp?dbcgm=1=oac
- Hostplus Superannuation Fund
https://hostplus.com.au/
It appears the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:51 PM Tom Browder wrote:
>
> I have used ext4 for many years while I have been watching zfs and
> btrfs being developed. I am now considering using one or both on at
> least one partion during my upcoming new Debian installation.
>
> Can anyone recommend either one for a
On 13.04.2019 19:40, Tyler A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had trouble visiting these two websites in Firefox, Epiphany and
> verifying with OpenSSL.
>
> - Births Deaths and Marriages (Government of South Australia)
> https://bdm.cbs.sa.gov.au/bdmsaonline/dbweb.asp?dbcgm=1=oac
>
> - Hostplus Superannuation
Anders Andersson composed on 2019-04-13 17:31 (UTC+0200):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Because of its snapshotting, BTRFS requires considerably more space than
>> older
>> filesystems, as much as double.
> A btrfs snapshot takes approximately zero space. Where did you get
> this idea from?
(not
On 13/4/19 3:57 pm, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 13.04.2019 19:40, Tyler A wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had trouble visiting these two websites in Firefox, Epiphany and
>> verifying with OpenSSL.
>>
>> - Births Deaths and Marriages (Government of South Australia)
>>
Curt wrote:
> On 2019-04-12, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> >
> > ZFS for /home makes sense, especially for anyone not already somewhat
> > familiar with ZFS.
>
> Well, if ZFS is this big sixteen-wheeler that you might crash into the
> concrete embankment if you're not careful, what are the benefits
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:36 PM Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Tom Browder composed on 2019-04-12 09:50 (UTC-0500):
>
> > I have used ext4 for many years while I have been watching zfs and
> > btrfs being developed. I am now considering using one or both on at
> > least one partion during my upcoming
#channel 2019
#este scrip lo que hace es inicar un .exe
#!/bin/bash
echo "Iniciando la maquina virtual"
echo " espere"
sleep 1
VBoxManage startvm 6b86be1b-fddd-4236-ba3e-108cf5099790
sleep 35
echo "ejecutando su aplicacion"
VBoxManage --nologo guestcontrol "mi-maquina-virtual" run --exe
Hi,
All along I just installed the standard system on a Debian machine. Created an
alias for the root user with the email address of our servicedesk to have it
send any mails to my servicedesk account and that was it.
The last Debian installations no longer have a default mailserver installed
On 2019-04-12, Thomas D Dial wrote:
>
> ZFS for /home makes sense, especially for anyone not already somewhat
> familiar with ZFS.
Well, if ZFS is this big sixteen-wheeler that you might crash into the
concrete embankment if you're not careful, what are the benefits that
outweigh or override
19 matches
Mail list logo
