Hi.
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:44:37PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 7/12/19 10:55 am, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > Have had a couple of questions that have gotten me thinking deeply,
> > primarily about whose/what safety I am really trying to protect. My best
> > answer is
> >
In a fresh debian10 installation with xfce4 when i try:
$ sudo apt-get remove xfce4
will present me with a maybe a hundred of packages that 'were
automatically installed and no longer needed' and that i should remove
if i want with 'apt autoremove'. And the only packages that would be
On Lu, 09 dec 19, 17:44:37, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 7/12/19 10:55 am, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > Have had a couple of questions that have gotten me thinking deeply,
> > primarily about whose/what safety I am really trying to protect. My best
> > answer is personal, physical safety of my
On 7/12/19 10:55 am, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
Have had a couple of questions that have gotten me thinking deeply,
primarily about whose/what safety I am really trying to protect. My best
answer is personal, physical safety of my family.
Good afternoon all
I have pondered over all you pros and
Received from Curt on Sun, 8 Dec 2019 14:54:15 - (UTC) Re:
[OT] Google security
> I am waiting to be convinced, though I do infer from a certain number
> of factors, including my personal experience and the experience of
> those around me, that the claim is false.
On 4/12/19 11:11 am, John Hasler wrote:
Yes. I suggest Newsguy o
Um
Firefox gave me this when I went to their web page
Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead
Nightly detected a potential security threat and did not continue to
member.newsguy.com. If you visit this site, attackers
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 05:10:06PM -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> Can xdm be cajoled into displaying "Reboot" and/or "Shutdown"
> buttons on its welcome screen?
>
> (By which odd choice of words I mean the principal screen presented
> by xdm at X start-up time, e.g. the one which queries the user
Can xdm be cajoled into displaying "Reboot" and/or "Shutdown"
buttons on its welcome screen?
(By which odd choice of words I mean the principal screen
presented by xdm at X start-up time, e.g. the one which queries
the user for credentials.)
Thank You
--
What can be asserted without
El dom., 8 de dic. de 2019 a la(s) 01:18, Jefferson Pizarro Gutierrez
(jp...@icloud.com) escribió:
>
> Hola, tengo un problema, uso una tarjeta de Sonido Asus Xonar SE. El problema
> es que no tengo audio con la tarjeta de sonido. Yo uso la salida SPDIF de la
> tarjeta de sonido. en el ultimo
On Sun 08 Dec 2019 at 13:09:10 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> No google now has a unique one now but didn't when the incidents
> happened.
I wish I understood what you mean. A "unique" what?
With the strong password that uou have (and the protections Google
provides) the balance of probability
No google now has a unique one now but didn't when the incidents
happened.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019, l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 12:55:12
> From: l0f...@tuta.io
> To: John Hasler
> Cc: Debian User
> Subject: Re: dropbox security situation
> Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 17:55:26
Hi,
8 déc. 2019 à 14:47 de jhas...@newsguy.com:
> Do you use the same username everywhere? It's common for criminals to
> collect lists of usernames and try them in combination with guessed
> passwords on as many services as possible. The yield is low but it's
> cost-effective for them because
Le 07/12/2019 à 21:27, Dethegeek a écrit :
> Bonjour
>
> Pour info, ma config à l'aide de xserver-xorg patché fonctionne sans
> problème avec gzdoom (un jeu vidéo donc). Par contre mes cartes étant
> peu performantes, j'ai joué en plein écran sur un seul moniteur.
>
> Bumblebee, de mémoire c'est
On 2019-12-08, John Hasler wrote:
> Curt writes:
>> Yet the confirmation bias of certain ideologues will get them to
>> believing...
>
> Confirmation bias of *all* ideologues and ideologies. Including yours.
How devastatingly clever. But you inverse the roles. I made no
unsubstantiated claim,
Curt writes:
> Yet the confirmation bias of certain ideologues will get them to
> believing...
Confirmation bias of *all* ideologues and ideologies. Including yours.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Do you use the same username everywhere? It's common for criminals to
collect lists of usernames and try them in combination with guessed
passwords on as many services as possible. The yield is low but it's
cost-effective for them because the process is fully automated using
thousands of bots
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 12:49:33PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> > What is a good way to fix this problem?
>
> Do you use "iif" or "oif" to match on the interface for libvirt?
>
> If yes, then you need to change this to use "iifname" or "oifname" ,
> because "iif"/"oif" can only be used to match on
Benedikt Tuchen wrote:
> I use nftables as my firewall and setup the nftables.conf today. My
> firewall rules are based on whitelisting. Everything is dropped from
> INPUT and FORWARD as long as there is no specific rule for it. For
> my libvirt network interface virbr1 there are also some
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 10:33:42AM -, Curt wrote:
> Also my understanding and experience. Yet the confirmation bias of
> certain ideologues [... ]
Ideologue. Noun. Anyone with views differing from Curt's
> [...] being trigger-happy fanatics) any and all FUD
Fanatic. Noun. Anyone whose
Hello,
I use nftables as my firewall and setup the nftables.conf today. My
firewall rules are based on whitelisting. Everything is dropped from
INPUT and FORWARD as long as there is no specific rule for it. For
my libvirt network interface virbr1 there are also some rules. I
enabled the
On 2019-12-08, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 7 déc. 2019 à 18:06 de jdash...@panix.com:
>
>> [...] google accounts whether two-step or not are routinely hacked
>>
> You are probably mixing up different notions here: cracking VS privacy
> VS social engineering (phishing). AFAIK, Google account security
>
Hi,
7 déc. 2019 à 18:06 de jdash...@panix.com:
> [...] google accounts whether two-step or not are routinely hacked
>
You are probably mixing up different notions here: cracking VS privacy VS
social engineering (phishing).
AFAIK, Google account security policy has very high standards towards
22 matches
Mail list logo
