On 2020-12-06 21:56, hdv@gmail wrote:
> # timedatectl set-ntp true
I am sorry for the typo. This should of course have been "false"!
Grx HdV
Hi Roberto and Reco,
Thanks for the replies!
MJ
On 12/4/20 3:58 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:13:02PM +0100, mj wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering about the SAD DNS vulnerability, and wether or not it is
solved in up-to-date debian 10.6.
buckwheatpancake wrote:
> So, Electron stuff in Debian comes with this annoying thing where it tells
> you chrome-sandbox (in various applications) needs to be owned by root and
> have mode 4755. If you set that, it just tells you the same, with another
> file. I've taken to running these
So, Electron stuff in Debian comes with this annoying thing where it tells you
chrome-sandbox (in various applications) needs to be owned by root and have
mode 4755. If you set that, it just tells you the same, with another file. I've
taken to running these things with the --no-sandbox option,
On 12/6/20 8:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 06 December 2020 16:40:37 Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:15:50 -0600
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
I found our old dial-up modem in a box of odds and ends 2
years ago and wondered if it could read callerID tones sent
> El 2020-12-05 a las 21:00 -0800, latin...@vcn.bc.ca escribió:
>
>> Pase Buster a Bullseye y tengo este error, probe lo recomendado, mas
>> desinstalar e instalar los paquetes mencionados, y no se corrige;
>> alguien
>> sabe la solucion, para este tipo de errores?
>>
>> You might want to run
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:33:04 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
> On 12/6/20 11:43 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several Firefox extensions (uBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere,
> > NoScript, Privacy Badger) installed from Debian packages. Recently (the
> > past few weeks / months?), they
On Sunday 06 December 2020 16:40:37 Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:15:50 -0600
>
> "Martin McCormick" wrote:
> > I found our old dial-up modem in a box of odds and ends 2
> > years ago and wondered if it could read callerID tones sent after
> > the first ring. It can so I
What is "form rendering"?
Sorry I meant "form of rendering"
Which Sea Islands do you have?
Radeon R5 M430. I checked it again and it seems to be Southern Islands.
I am not sure.
Which Debian are you using?
Debian Testing
Which DDX driver are you using?
I am not sure what is DDX driver.
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:15:50 -0600
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
> I found our old dial-up modem in a box of odds and ends 2
> years ago and wondered if it could read callerID tones sent after
> the first ring. It can so I started on a perl program that
> initializes the modem for callerID
On 2020-12-06 21:43, Michael Grant wrote:
I need to set the date to several years in the future in order to test
something. When I do this via the date command, the date returns back
almost instantly (or within a few seconds).
# timedatectl set-time 2025-12-06 20:41:41
# date
Sat 6 Dec
I need to set the date to several years in the future in order to test
something. When I do this via the date command, the date returns back almost
instantly (or within a few seconds).
# timedatectl set-time 2025-12-06 20:41:41
# date
Sat 6 Dec 20:41:43 GMT 2025
# date
Sat 6 Dec 20:41:44 GMT
* 2020-12-06 16:39:29Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
> Reply-To header to ensure you send your message to the correct place'.
That's easy. Reply-To may not have the address which some other person
thinks is the correct place for his
On 12/6/20 11:43 AM, Celejar wrote:
Hi,
I have several Firefox extensions (uBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere,
NoScript, Privacy Badger) installed from Debian packages. Recently (the
past few weeks / months?), they have begun to disappear from Firefox -
they stop funcioning, and they don't appear
On 12/6/20 11:15 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
It's nice to see that I am not the only sick puppy out there.
At 69 years old, I still don't have much trouble with
getting in touch with my inner 12-year-old when it comes to
intrusive marketing which is so prevalent these days.
I
Hi,
I have several Firefox extensions (uBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere,
NoScript, Privacy Badger) installed from Debian packages. Recently (the
past few weeks / months?), they have begun to disappear from Firefox -
they stop funcioning, and they don't appear on the toolbar, nor are
they available
It's nice to see that I am not the only sick puppy out there.
At 69 years old, I still don't have much trouble with
getting in touch with my inner 12-year-old when it comes to
intrusive marketing which is so prevalent these days.
I found our old dial-up modem in a box of odds and
El 2020-12-06 a las 12:08 -0600, Martin Jesús Soberón Mobarak escribió:
> Soy usuario de Debian y me encanta. Recientemente adquirí un portátil
> Lenovo Ideapad 3 por la gracia de venir sin sistema operativo, pues me
> resisto a la idea de pagar por la licencia de windows para borrarlo.
> Hechos:
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:49:41 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hello Stefan,
>The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
>other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
Reply-To
On Sat 05 Dec 2020 at 20:50:44 -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> The installer then gives the option to search for USB devices. It
> gives no evidence of a hdd although it's running from one. (?) In the
> snapshot of console 4, the last line reports "devices found: ''".
> Meaning "no
Saludos foristas!
Soy usuario de Debian y me encanta. Recientemente adquirí un portátil
Lenovo Ideapad 3 por la gracia de venir sin sistema operativo, pues me
resisto a la idea de pagar por la licencia de windows para borrarlo.
Hechos:
A.- Descargo Debian 10 (non free) y procedo a la instalación
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Jo, 03 dec 20, 07:39:14, Martin McCormick wrote:
> >
> > So, I need to read more general information about the
> > differences between systemd and what we've been using up to
> > recently.
>
> The Wikipedia page and/or https://systemd.io might be a good place to
From: David Wright
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:12:16 -0600
> With such a small disk, I'd try modifying that suggestion: dispense
> with /home, but only during the installation, making partition 3 the
> one used for the iso ( and marked "do not use"):
>
> Part 1 labeled ROOT. 7 GB. Format ext4.
> My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
> broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
without knowing what
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:42:49 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed.
My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
Reply-To because that's where I want
* 2020-12-06 11:23:06Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I set a Reply-To for mailing list mails because I *DO NOT WANT* a
> private reply. Your treatment of that is completely broken. Credit the
> sender with some intelligence, and do as they request.
It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed.
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:01:46 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello rhkra...@gmail.com,
>Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply
Certainly there are people that do that, but I don't;
It's inviting an accident to happen.
If I'm following up on a list mail privately (it's
On Sunday, December 06, 2020 06:23:06 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
> If I wanted a private reply, I wouldn't have sent the message to the
> list in the first place.
Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply (or at least, not
be surprised if I got a private reply).
For instance, if I
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:14:25 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>There is sense in this. Reply means "reply to sender". If Reply-To has
>the same address as in To/Cc then the Reply-To address probably is not
>sender's address. So don't honour Reply-To and use From instead. It is
>also a
Le 06/12/2020 10:33:03, Jérôme a écrit :
> Le papier c'est bien, c'est fiable, c'est durable, ça résiste aux
> radiations, mais c'est lourd et ça prend de la place tant dans le sac
> que dans la bibliothèque et dans les caisses quand on déménage
> souvent... La liseuse ou la tablette c'est quand
Le Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:29:59 +,
benoit a écrit :
> Je ne l'ai pas trouvé...
Pour ce genre de chose, je préfère largement les installer dans une
machine virtuelle sous Win7..10, d'abord il n'y a pas les
restrictions de Wine, ça marche toujours, et j'ai la faiblesse de penser
que moins
Le Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:18:39 +0100,
Pierre Malard a écrit :
> Appeler « achat » un bien pour lequel il faut demander l’autorisation
> de l’utiliser à chaque usage (DRM) et donc pour lequel il faut être
> connecté pour en jouir n’est pas, à mon sens, un achat mais une forme
> de « location », et
* 2020-12-05 21:33:58Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> 2. A Reply-To is set, either by the list[1] or by the Sender
>
> Even with one set, many ppl /still/ manage to not honour it.
My email application (Notmuch) normally honours Reply-To but
El 2020-12-05 a las 21:00 -0800, latin...@vcn.bc.ca escribió:
> Pase Buster a Bullseye y tengo este error, probe lo recomendado, mas
> desinstalar e instalar los paquetes mencionados, y no se corrige; alguien
> sabe la solucion, para este tipo de errores?
>
> You might want to run 'apt
34 matches
Mail list logo
