Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread songbird
Cousin Stanley wrote: > Reading this newsgroup earlier today > someone mentioned the hugo package > for static site generation. > > I was curious about the package > so I tried > > $ apt-cache show hugo ... i have been building hugo on my Debian system for quite a while

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:37:30PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote: > David Wright wrote: > > > How about: > > > > $ apt-cache show hugo | grep -v '^Built-Using:' > > > > which you could wrap into a function. > > > > I don't mind the Built-Using list at all > for reasonable sized lists and

Re : Re: Régler luminosité écran carte vidéo Intel

2022-03-14 Thread k6dedijon
Bonjour, > le contraste. > Plus chaque valeur tend vers 0 plus le contraste augmente et inversement Pour du texte, le contraste est la différence entre le fond et le texte. Test pratique : Transformez une capture d'écran en noir et blanc. avec une pipette, mesurez la valeur de la couleur la

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Cousin Stanley
David Wright wrote: > How about: > > $ apt-cache show hugo | grep -v '^Built-Using:' > > which you could wrap into a function. > I don't mind the Built-Using list at all for reasonable sized lists and I wouldn't care to remove it altogether. I can use your suggestion to remove it

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Cousin Stanley
Dan Ritter wrote: > > Not having Built-Using is just like not having dependencies. Thanks for the explanation. I can understand the need for the Built-Using list for the developers that need it. In cases such as that for the l o n g list returned for golang built packages

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread David Wright
On Mon 14 Mar 2022 at 16:33:42 (-0700), Cousin Stanley wrote: > Andy Smith wrote: > > > > So this information is needed for the developers and packagers, > > but I suppose you could argue that it is information overload > > for the casual user of "apt show". > > It seems to be

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Cousin Stanley
Andy Smith wrote: > > So this information is needed for the developers and packagers, > but I suppose you could argue that it is information overload > for the casual user of "apt show". It seems to be information overload for me pesonally. Perhaps a link to the relevant golang list

Re: got a mdadm puzzler

2022-03-14 Thread gene heskett
On Monday, 14 March 2022 17:10:10 EDT Andy Smith wrote: > Gene, > > I just don't know where to start with finding relevant bits to quote > from your text. > > I find it unlikely that several of the drives you have bought should > all be failed and dead. I'm concerned that you're prematurely >

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Dan Ritter
Cousin Stanley wrote: > Reading this newsgroup earlier today > someone mentioned the hugo package > for static site generation. > > I was curious about the package > so I tried > > $ apt-cache show hugo > > The usual package information was returned > along with, in

Re: got a mdadm puzzler

2022-03-14 Thread Andy Smith
Gene, I just don't know where to start with finding relevant bits to quote from your text. I find it unlikely that several of the drives you have bought should all be failed and dead. I'm concerned that you're prematurely jumping to conclusions and junking them. It's normal for the device nodes

Re: packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote: > $ apt-cache show hugo > > The usual package information was returned > along with, in my opinion, an unsightly mess > entailing a long string of 88 entries > naming individual golang packages > following

packages built with golang

2022-03-14 Thread Cousin Stanley
Reading this newsgroup earlier today someone mentioned the hugo package for static site generation. I was curious about the package so I tried $ apt-cache show hugo The usual package information was returned along with, in my opinion, an unsightly mess entailing a

Re: Wayland vs X

2022-03-14 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022, 2:21 PM Marco Möller < ta...@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> wrote: > On 14.03.22 18:28, Anssi Saari wrote: > > Marco Möller writes: > > > >> I am not sure if I understood your answer. Is it a suggestion of what > >> should be of importance, or is it the confirmation that

Re: Wayland vs X

2022-03-14 Thread Marco Möller
On 14.03.22 18:28, Anssi Saari wrote: Marco Möller writes: I am not sure if I understood your answer. Is it a suggestion of what should be of importance, or is it the confirmation that Wayland is capable to configure clipboard access restrictive like this? Um, I thought a question mark is a

Re: adding trouble on the trouble (using apt upgrade)

2022-03-14 Thread Patrice Duroux
ps: sorry, on a Debian Sid system for sure. Le lun. 14 mars 2022 à 19:41, Patrice Duroux a écrit : > > Hi, > > Since some versions ago, apt/dpkg(?) is stopping its process (upgrade > here) whatever the packaging trouble it is facing. But in some cases, it > may leave the system more broken than

adding trouble on the trouble (using apt upgrade)

2022-03-14 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, Since some versions ago, apt/dpkg(?) is stopping its process (upgrade here) whatever the packaging trouble it is facing. But in some cases, it may leave the system more broken than it would become just by 'skipping' the troubling package. For instance, in the upgrading transaction list were

Re: Comment recharger un module noyau planté ?

2022-03-14 Thread Hugues Larrive
Bonjour, Au vu du kern.log, j'ai l'impression que c'est la carte wifi qui plante et non le module : Mar 10 10:14:13 dell kernel: [146989.982839] ath10k_pci :02:00.0: failed to wake target for write32 of 0x0579 at 0x0003543c: -110 [plein de failed to wake target] Mar 10 10:17:23 dell

Re: Wayland vs X

2022-03-14 Thread Anssi Saari
Marco Möller writes: > I am not sure if I understood your answer. Is it a suggestion of what > should be of importance, or is it the confirmation that Wayland is > capable to configure clipboard access restrictive like this? Um, I thought a question mark is a fairly common indication of a

Re: Wayland vs X

2022-03-14 Thread Marco Möller
On 14.03.22 16:23, Anssi Saari wrote: Nicholas Geovanis writes: Isn't it all about X by design to not be able to safely protect a running X applications to snoop on other running X applications, something like the content of a window cannot safely kept private? Well, what about

Re: Wayland vs X

2022-03-14 Thread Anssi Saari
Nicholas Geovanis writes: > Isn't it all about X by design to not be able to safely protect a > running X applications to snoop on other running X applications, > something like the content of a window cannot safely kept private? Well, what about something basic like allowing only specific

Re: Régler luminosité écran carte vidéo Intel

2022-03-14 Thread ajh-valmer
On Friday 11 March 2022 00:56:31 Pierre ESTREM wrote: > A mon avis c'est en baissant chaque valeur pour R, V et B qu'on change > le contraste. > Plus chaque valeur tend vers 0 plus le contraste augmente et inversement > plus elles tendent vers 255 plus on le baisse (blanc !). > $ xgamma -gamma

Re: iwd + systemd-networkd + resolvconf wrinkles

2022-03-14 Thread Thomas Pircher
David Wright wrote: I was casting round for a simple way to run iwd + resolvconf + systemd-networkd as replacement. I run a similar setup, with iwd, systemd-networkd and systemd-resolved. This has been working without problems on my host for for quite a while now. Make a copy of your