On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
local10 wrote:
> Jul 10, 2022, 00:51 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
>
> > I do it in part by
> > using my own resolver, BIND9, and having it return only IPv4
> > addresses.
>
> How did you do it? I tried to start named with "-4" option to use
>
On Sat 9 Jul 2022, at 10:05, Roger Price wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Gareth Evans wrote:
>
>> Also for any good nft/netfilter overview articles etc.
>
> Have you seen "Mastering Linux Security and Hardening", 2nd Edition, Donald
> A.
> Tevault, chapter 4. Suitable for those of us who read
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, B.M. wrote:
Verifying that your procdure with two UDF images is not the culprit would
help even if the result is boringly ok, as we expect. (Or we are in for
a surprise ...)
I don't have two UDF images.
Not been following this closely, but I do something very similar and
Jul 10, 2022, 00:51 by charlescur...@charlescurley.com:
> I do it in part by
> using my own resolver, BIND9, and having it return only IPv4 addresses.
>
How did you do it? I tried to start named with "-4" option to use only ipv4 but
it refused to start with that option, IIRC.
Regards,
On 7/9/22 21:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 06:51:22PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 06:51:22PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
> gene heskett wrote:
>
> > Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
> > whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we have
> > no choice but to
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 15:59:48 -0400
gene heskett wrote:
> Andy, you obviously don't live in ipv4 only territory. Until n-m or
> whatever gets trained to auto switch to ipv4 if 6 fails, then we have
> no choice but to disable it if we want network connectivity of any
> kind outside of our own home
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Tim Woodall wrote:
Hi
$ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
Installed: 1.20.10
Candidate: 1.20.10
Version table:
*** 1.20.10 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.19.8 500
500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local
On 7/9/22 08:41, B.M. wrote:
If you want you can have a look at my script, I attached it to this mail...
I have written several generations of such scripts in Bourne and Perl
over the past 3+ decades. They all have obvious and inobvious
limitations and bugs.
What we both have are
On 7/9/22 11:31, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
When I try to start fetchmail I get the error message
Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
reading message
mail...@rogerprice.org@mail.gandi.net:1 of
On Saturday, 9 July 2022 20:16:36 CEST Sjoerd wrote:
> Nee, sda is een SSD van 256 GB, sdb een harde schijf van 1 TB.
Voor de kernel zijn dat dezelfde categorie schijven, vandaar dat de
schijfaanduiding bij allebei sdX is.
> > Is het UEFI?
>
> Nee, nog altijd BIOS.
> Misschien nog eens een
Paul van der Vlis schreef:
> Waarom die sda en sdb soms verwisseld zijn weet ik ook niet, misschien
> een timing issue. Vertel misschien wat het voor apparaten zijn, zitten
> er USB apparaten bij?
Nee, sda is een SSD van 256 GB, sdb een harde schijf van 1 TB.
> En wat is de bootvolgorde in het
On Saturday, 9 July 2022 18:05:11 CEST Sjoerd wrote:
> Het volgende vreemde verschijnsel doet zich voor. (Debian testing)
> Meestal, maar niet altijd, zie ik dat sda en sdb verwisseld zijn.
Je kan/mag er NIET van uit gaan dat de letters constant naar dezelfde schijf
wijzen. De kernel 'probed'
Hoi Sjoerd,
Op 09-07-2022 om 18:05 schreef Sjoerd:
Het volgende vreemde verschijnsel doet zich voor. (Debian testing)
Meestal, maar niet altijd, zie ik dat sda en sdb verwisseld zijn.
Bijvoorbeeld, bij een 'df' zie ik dat '/' op sdb2 zit, terwijl ik weet dat
ik op sda2 zit.
In gparted zie ik
Bonjour,
Je vise le double objectif suivant :
1/ permettre à des utilisateurs linux (CLI ou GUI) ou autre win (ou MacOS, mais
ça coince un peu apparemment) d'accéder à leur machine devenue virtualisée sur
un beau serveru linux ; depuis un poste quelconque muni du client idoine (ssh,
x2go,
Hi,
B.M. wrote:
> If you want you can have a look at my script, I attached it to this mail...
Will do. (There must be some rational explanation ...)
> "Filesystem full" is not handled at all. Typically if this happens it's
> quite late i.e. most folders are already backuped and I do the
Het volgende vreemde verschijnsel doet zich voor. (Debian testing)
Meestal, maar niet altijd, zie ik dat sda en sdb verwisseld zijn.
Bijvoorbeeld, bij een 'df' zie ik dat '/' op sdb2 zit, terwijl ik weet dat
ik op sda2 zit.
In gparted zie ik dat sda en sdb overal verwisseld zijn.
Bij een
Thomas George wrote:
>
> On 7/8/22 7:30 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Thomas George wrote:
> > > On 7/8/22 5:57 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > Thomas George wrote:
> > > > > speaker-test fails
> >
> > Now try
> >
> > speaker-test -C2 -Dhw:Generic
> > speaker-test -C2 -Dfront:Generic
> >
> > and so
> > > A UDF filesystem image is supposed to bear at its start 32 KiB of zeros.
>
> B.M. wrote:
> > This is indeed the case:
> > [...]
> > For a readable disk, this look like you said: Only zeros.
>
> So it looks like at least a part of the problem is decryption.
Agreed
> > > If UDF does not work
Am 09.07.22 um 16:14 schrieb Andy Smith:
> Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
> than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
>
I do not know about this case, but there are still situations where
applications have problems with IPv6. For example the proprietary
Am 09.07.22 um 15:52 schrieb Roger Price:
> because directory /proc/sys/net/ipv6 doesn't exist. What is the new way of
> disabling IPv6?
I did it recently just in the way you described on Debian 11.
--
http://www.cb-fraggle.de
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> When I try to start fetchmail I get the error message
>
> Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
> reading message
> mail...@rogerprice.org@mail.gandi.net:1 of 7 (8954 octets)
>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:52:27PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> Jul 09 10:22:57 titan fetchmail[7286]:
> Connection errors for this poll:
> name 0: connection to localhost:smtp [127.0.0.1/25] failed:
> Connection refused.
> name
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Andy Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to persuade
fetchmail to talk to exim4.
Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to persuade
> fetchmail to talk to exim4.
Sounds like you have a misconfiguration that should be fixed, rather
than disabling IPv6 to work around it.
>
On 7/9/22 15:52, Roger Price wrote:
In a Debian 11 system, I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to
persuade fetchmail to talk to exim4. The advice generally given is to
add a line to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
and run sysctl -p as root. With Debian 11
In a Debian 11 system, I would like to disable IPv6 adapters in order to
persuade fetchmail to talk to exim4. The advice generally given is to add a
line to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
and run sysctl -p as root. With Debian 11 this generates the error message
On Sat 09 Jul 2022 at 08:58:36 (-0400), Devin Harper wrote:
[reordered into some sort of logical order]
> please add the most necessary and common examples of package management
> with apt to the synopsis of "man apt".
> the commands that should be in the synopsis are "sudo apt update",
> "apt
hi
please add the most necessary and common examples of package management
with apt to the synopsis of "man apt". this will act as a readme for all
debian based distros to use apt as their only package manager. cli package
management is way better than ubuntu's software package manager for
Tim Woodall wrote:
> Hi
>
> $ APT_CONFIG=../apt/apt.conf.buster.amd64 apt-cache policy dpkg
> dpkg:
> Installed: 1.20.10
> Candidate: 1.20.10
> Version table:
> *** 1.20.10 100
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 1.19.8 500
> 500 http://aptmirror17.home.woodall.me.uk/local
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Gareth Evans wrote:
Also for any good nft/netfilter overview articles etc.
Have you seen "Mastering Linux Security and Hardening", 2nd Edition, Donald A.
Tevault, chapter 4. Suitable for those of us who read this newbie thread.
Roger
On Sat 9 Jul 2022, at 07:17, Gareth Evans wrote:
[...]
> If there is no drop by default, why add "policy accept" for
> related/established as it does? Doesn't this happen anyway?
I suppose this probably modifies behaviour for otherwise closed ports (which
would make sense for a firewall!)
Having found ufw suited my needs I have only dabbled with firewalld /
firewall-config / firewall-applet over the years.
Having noticed the recommendation for firewalld on the debian wiki re nftables
https://wiki.debian.org/nftables#Use_firewalld
I installed it and had a look at the default
33 matches
Mail list logo
