Re: Network Problem: Redirection
Am 02.02.2024 um 17:12:06 Uhr schrieb Gremlin: > On 2/2/24 16:28, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:03:46PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > >> root@hawk:~# host samba > >> samba.localdomain is an alias for hawk.localdomain. > >> hawk.localdomain has address 192.168.100.6 > > > > host(1) looks in DNS only. It doesn't do the standard name > > resolution that applications do. > > > > host gremlin > gremlin.home.arpa has address 192.168.1.4 > gremlin.home.arpa has IPv6 address fe80::a940:6c49:a620:4c09 You have to check from where the other IP address comes. -- Gruß Marco Spam und Werbung bitte an ichschickerekl...@cartoonies.org
Re: Q: Gnome network odd
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 10:41 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 02 Feb 2024 at 07:37:34 (+), Tixy wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 22:12 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > I also have a more vague memory that you could put config into > > > > /etc/network/interfaces then in some circumstance > > > > NetworkManager > > > > would > > > > not try and manage that interface, and in others it would take > > > > over. > > > > (Perhaps selected by allow hotplug option in the ifupdown > > > > config?) > > > > > > That seems unlikely. Perhaps you're thinking of NM's ifupdown > > > plugin > > > that allows you to use the configuration in /e/n/i. I'm assuming > > > the > > > OP has not installed that in their sleep. > > > > They wouldn't need to because it looks like it's shipped with the > > main > > network-manage package which contains various files with 'plugin' > > in > > their name, including libnm-settings-plugin-ifupdown.so. > > What I said was unlikely is that an option in ifupdown's > configuration, > /e/n/i, would control NM's behaviour. It's the mere mention of the > interface there, as in iface enp5s0 inet dhcp that makes ifupdown > control it, and makes NM back off, AIUI. > > > As we've seen from the OPs latest reply, the plugin is configured > > to > > not manage interfaces. > > Right, and so the default NM configuration (ifupdown plugin present, > news to me) and [ifupdown] // managed=false in the .conf file, > means that NM should not, by default, configure any interface > mentioned in /e/n/i. In the OP's case, the original /e/n/i: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 433 Oct 4 17:23 interfaces.orig > is big enough to hold a typical lo+eth+wlan configuration, which > we haven't seen yet. Sorry for late, David! Still i am on Debian Sid. And all Gnome network works very well. And here is the detail contents of /e/n/i file: root@thinkpad-e495:/etc/network# ls -l total 24 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 7 18:51 if-down.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 8 19:45 if-post-down.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 8 19:45 if-pre-up.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 7 18:51 if-up.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 24 2023 interfaces.d -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 433 Oct 4 17:23 interfaces.orig root@thinkpad-e495:/etc/network# cat interfaces.orig # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). source /etc/network/interfaces.d/* # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface allow-hotplug wlp4s0 iface wlp4s0 inet dhcp # wireless-* options are implemented by the wireless-tools package wireless-mode managed wireless-essid V30_3982 root@thinkpad-e495:/etc/network# date Sun Feb 4 13:48:14 KST 2024 root@thinkpad-e495:/etc/network# NOTE: 1. I have never touched the inside of that file. 2. I guess the real original file was from Debian 12. Thanks!!! Sincerely, Byunghee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
Re: install Kernel and GRUB in chroot.
Tim Woodall composed on 2024-02-03 21:25 (UTC): > Max Nikulin wrote: >> It seems secure boot is disabled in your case, so I am wondering why you do >> not boot xen.efi directly. > Because the NVRAM is extremely tempremental. Not in my experience. I recognized long ago that WRT non-removable media, only one bootloader per machine is required, and pretty well stuck to having only one active, or at all, no matter how many FOSS operating systems or media I have installed. The Grubs I have used are not picky about whose kernel or initrd they are called to load. With only one bootloader installed, retouching NVRAM isn't often required, and there needn't be much in it to scramble. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata
Re: install Kernel and GRUB in chroot.
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024, Max Nikulin wrote: It seems secure boot is disabled in your case, so I am wondering why you do not boot xen.efi directly. Because the NVRAM is extremely tempremental. Most updates fail, or worse, corrupt it to the point it's hard to get anything to boot. Additionally, there was a bug in an older version of xen that caused a kernel oops if wifi networking was started. So I wanted to start vanilla debian and I don't dare touch the NVRAM again (or the bios) until I absolutely have to. I don't remember for certain now but I might be booting using bootx86.efi (which is a copy of grubx64.efi) It's an old laptop but it still works well for me.
Re: [resolu]: firefox et avira
On 2/3/24 18:50, Th.A.C wrote: Le 03/02/2024 à 18:04, Kohler Gerard a écrit : en fait il y avais une palanquée de cookies plus ou moins camouflés, j'ai tout effacé, on verra bien, c'est terrible qu'un soit disant antivirus se permette d'installer des cookies sans avertir alors que l'on est pas allé sur le site Heu, un cookie, c'est pas actif, ce n'est qu'un bête fichier texte, ca ne peut pas déclencher un message sans un programme associé. Et a priori, une extension ne peut pas s'installer dans Firefox sans ton accord explicite. Une autre possibilité est d'utiliser un navigateur sans support de Javascript (ou de Webassembly), donc sans exécution de code (Turing complet) dans le navigateur. Un tel navigateur existe sous Debian. Par exemple dillo. Librement -- Basile Starynkevitch (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement) 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/ See/voir: https://github.com/RefPerSys/RefPerSys
Re: problèmes de copie sur un montage smb, crash kernel
Salut, Merci Erwann pour le retour. Ça tombe bien, c'est un syno également qui fait le service de fichiers en SMB. Je viens d'activer le service en NFS pour tester... et, là, la copie ne plante pas (deb démarré avec le noyau *6.1.0-17*). Donc, il y a quelquechose qui ne se passe pas bien entre le SMB de syno et le noyau*6.1.0-17*, car avec le noyau *6.1.0-10* pas de soucis. Apriori tester de ton côté le SMB, amènera certainement un "crash kernel" je pense. Par contre sur le syno, la version de samba est (un peu ancienne) : Version 4.15.9 Synology Build 42934, Jul 5 2023 16:31:41 ce qui peut peut-être expliquer le problème (?) T On 03/02/2024 13:08, Erwann Le Bras wrote: bonjour Pas de pb constaté pour ma part. Peut-être que le fautif serait le serveur? Pour ma part : erwann@inspiron:~$ uname -a Linux inspiron *6.1.0-17-amd64* #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.69-1 (2023-12-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux erwann@inspiron:~$ grep synology /etc/fstab #synology:/volume1/pub /mnt/pub nfs nofail,soft,timeo=5,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,users,atime,rw,dev,exec,suid 0 0 synology:/volume1/pub /mnt/pub nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14 0 0 #synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr 0 0 synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,soft,timeo=5,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,users,atime,rw,dev,exec,suid 0 0 #synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14 0 0 Les copies fonctionnent sans problème. Dans mon cas, le serveur NFS est un NAS Synology DS216se Je ne me souviens plus pourquoi j'ai des options différentes pour les deux points de montage. Erwann Le 02/02/2024 à 21:28, testeur a écrit : J'ai tenté les trois options de montage mais pas mieux. Le log du crash noyau est quasi identique. Ça semble venir du noyau 6.1.0-17. Car avec le noyau 6.1.0-10, pas de problèmes Je vais rester sur le noyau précédent... Cdlt On 01/02/2024 10:11, Michel Verdier wrote: Le 31 janvier 2024 testeur a écrit : voici les droits du montage : ├─/mnt/xxx /etc/autoxxx.smb autofs rw,relatime,fd=12,pgrp=1561,timeout=30,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect,pipe_ino=22915 │ └─/mnt/xxx/conf //xx.xx.xx.xx/xxx/conf cifs rw,relatime,vers=3.1.1,cache=strict,username=xxx,uid=1000,noforceuid,gid=1000,noforcegid,addr=xx.xx.xx.xx,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1,closetimeo=1 Tu peux peut-être essayer avec cache=none et hard (au lieu de soft) pour voir si tu obtiens plus d'infos. Tu peux aussi jouer avec echo_interval si ton réseau ou ton serveur distant est lent. Je ne me souviens plus pour autofs mais son timeout ne devrait-il pas être plus élevé que celui de cifs ?
Re: Automatically installing GRUB on multiple drives
Hi, On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote: > There is an alternative to hardware RAID if you want a Linux RAID: you can > disable UEFI in the BIOS and delete the ESP as I did when I bought my gaming > PC several years ago. I have storage devices which legacy BIOS cannot see for booting purposes. In past years these would require an "option ROM", Today, they require UEFI firmware. They aren't exotic devices; just enterprise NVMe. Thanks, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Re: [resolu]: firefox et avira
Le 03/02/2024 à 18:04, Kohler Gerard a écrit : en fait il y avais une palanquée de cookies plus ou moins camouflés, j'ai tout effacé, on verra bien, c'est terrible qu'un soit disant antivirus se permette d'installer des cookies sans avertir alors que l'on est pas allé sur le site Heu, un cookie, c'est pas actif, ce n'est qu'un bête fichier texte, ca ne peut pas déclencher un message sans un programme associé. Et a priori, une extension ne peut pas s'installer dans Firefox sans ton accord explicite. Donc suit plutôt les conseils de Michel et d'Haricophile ;-)
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024, Russell L. Harris wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:25:09PM -0500, Lee wrote: >which keyboard do you like and why? ... Cherry makes/uses a good keyswitch. Buy Cherry. RLH I bought a Cherry MX 3000 USB. In use permanently in a very dusty environment next to a wood stove. No problems. Roger
Re: firefox et avira
Le Sat, 3 Feb 2024 15:33:12 +0100, Kohler Gerard a écrit : > je suis sous debian 5.10 > > depuis 48h j'ai des messages intempestifs d'avira à chaque fois que > j'ouvre firefox, alors que je n'ai jamais installé ce logiciel. > > comment faire pour me débarrasser de cette plaie ? > > merci A priori une extension installée par erreur. Au pire, essaye : firefox --ProfileManager et tu crée un nouveau profil pour voir
[resolu]: firefox et avira
Le 03/02/2024 à 15:57, Michel Verdier a écrit : Le 3 février 2024 Kohler Gerard a écrit : je suis sous debian 5.10 Tu parles de Lenny ou du kernel 5.10 dans Bullseye ? J'espère que c'est l'option 2 :) depuis 48h j'ai des messages intempestifs d'avira à chaque fois que j'ouvre firefox, alors que je n'ai jamais installé ce logiciel. Regarde les extensions que tu as d'installées/activées. Si tu conserves tes onglets, regarde si tu n'en as pas 1 qui provoque ça. Tu peux aussi regarder les données pour le site avira. Tu connais les menus pour tout ça ? merci pour vos réponses, je parlais du kernel sur bullseye bien sur ! en fait il y avais une palanquée de cookies plus ou moins camouflés, j'ai tout effacé, on verra bien, c'est terrible qu'un soit disant antivirus se permette d'installer des cookies sans avertir alors que l'on est pas allé sur le site bref ! lngue vie à debian ! Gérard -- == https://www.leregardduchat.fr/ ==
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:10:49AM -0500, Lee wrote: On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 8:57???PM Russell L. Harris wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:25:09PM -0500, Lee wrote: >which keyboard do you like and why? CHERRY MX BOARD 3.0 (Purchased several years ago; in daily use since.) Excellent mechanical quality of the keyswitch. Keyswitch plungers which start sticking (high resistance upon depression) is the biggest problem I have found. The next-greatest problem is intermittent contact of key switch contacts. Both problems are maddening for the touch typist. OK - good to know. I am a touch typist, so I guess I'm giving that one a pass. I am saying that these are the biggest problems I have found with keyboards in general, and that the CHERRY MX BOARD 3.0 does not have these problems. If you are a touch typist, focus upon the quality of the keyswitch. Cherry makes/uses a good keyswitch. Buy Cherry. RLH
Re: install Kernel and GRUB in chroot.
Main question is resolved. GRUB knows how to reach grub.cfg because grubx64.efi binary has the UUID and path to grub configurations. 1. sudo blkid; 2. sudo bash 3. cd /boot/efi/EFI/Mangaro 4. strings grubx64.efi 5. And at the output of strings there is UUID and /boot/grub. Summary: GRUB installation not only involves configuration of text files, but also it involves generating data in binary grubx64.efi.
Re: firefox et avira
Le 3 février 2024 Kohler Gerard a écrit : > je suis sous debian 5.10 Tu parles de Lenny ou du kernel 5.10 dans Bullseye ? J'espère que c'est l'option 2 :) > depuis 48h j'ai des messages intempestifs d'avira à chaque fois que > j'ouvre firefox, alors que je n'ai jamais installé ce logiciel. Regarde les extensions que tu as d'installées/activées. Si tu conserves tes onglets, regarde si tu n'en as pas 1 qui provoque ça. Tu peux aussi regarder les données pour le site avira. Tu connais les menus pour tout ça ?
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:51 PM Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 20:25 -0500, Lee wrote: > > I figure there's a high percentage of keyboard jockeys here so .. > > which keyboard do you like and why? > > I like the flat style similar to what is in many notebooks. Current > favourites are the Apple keyboards (expensive though, for what they > are), the Microsoft Designer Compact Keyboard (stupid generic model > name), that seems to have a problem for some that the electronics die > prematurely, it might not be able to connect any longer after some > time. Great if it works though, can often be gotten relatively cheaply > for about half the normal price. Very minimal design, you can't take > away much more from a keyboard: > > https://www.microsoft.com/en/accessories/products/keyboards/microsoft-designer-compact-keyboard?activetab=pivot:overviewtab That looks nice for a tablet or something that you'll be carrying around. > And a new fascination of mine, the Logitech MX series, also kind > of expensive, and with rather ugly design, but typing feels just > wonderful. Logitech seems to be quitting the corded keyboard business :( I go to their keyboard selection site, select full sized with numpad and corded and only two keyboards show up - the one I pulled out of the closet that I think is too tall and a K-845. I don't have a whole lot of luck with batteries or wireless, so a cord is a must for me. > Of the cheaper ones, I like the Logitech k280e. Feels quite OK for the > price, not on the level of the obove three though. Also large, clunky > and heavy. > > I used to be a full layout (with keypad) person, but recently I began > to like the smaller layouts. Takes up less space on the desk, only > thing I miss are the full cursor keys. Easier to move around on the > desk, which I do a lot. > > Keyboards are a product where preferences diverge a lot and are very > personal. Fortunately there is lots of choice in the market currently. As I'm seeing :) Thanks Lee
Re: firefox et avira
Salut, Debian 5 ! Lngue vie a toi et à ta destrib ! Le sam. 3 févr. 2024 à 15:42, Kohler Gerard a écrit : > bonjour, > > je suis sous debian 5.10 > > depuis 48h j'ai des messages intempestifs d'avira à chaque fois que > j'ouvre firefox, alors que je n'ai jamais installé ce logiciel. > > comment faire pour me débarrasser de cette plaie ? > > merci > > Gérard > > > -- > == > https://www.leregardduchat.fr/ > == > >
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On 3 Feb 2024 08:34 +0100, from m...@dorfdsl.de (Marco Moock): >> I figure there's a high percentage of keyboard jockeys here so .. >> which keyboard do you like and why? > > IBM Model M. > They are still made by the company Unicomp, with PS/2, DIN or USB. I was going to suggest that too, but OP in Feb 3 14:31 UTC dismissed daskeyboard because loud isn't an option, so I guess that makes a Model M an even worse choice. Probably can't beat it for durability, though. Whichever keyboard you go for, I do recommend to make sure that either it's hermetically sealed (unlikely...) or that the keys are easily removable and replaceable for cleaning. Because no matter how clean you try to keep it, grime eventually does get in and start interfering with the mechanism. -- Michael Kjörling https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
Re: what keyboard do you use?
Dan Ritter wrote on 03/02/2024 13:16: As far as I know, Logitech doesn't make a mechanical keyboard. Logitech now has, with and w/o ten key block: search for "Logitech MX Mechanical". They are wireless with USB adapter and have a configurable mono-color key light. I myself use the MX Mechanical Mini. Can be configured from Linux with solaar. Regards, Jörg.
firefox et avira
bonjour, je suis sous debian 5.10 depuis 48h j'ai des messages intempestifs d'avira à chaque fois que j'ouvre firefox, alors que je n'ai jamais installé ce logiciel. comment faire pour me débarrasser de cette plaie ? merci Gérard -- == https://www.leregardduchat.fr/ ==
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:09 PM Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * On 2024 02 Feb 19:26 -0600, Lee wrote: > > I bought a Dell desktop in 2019 and the keyboard just died :( > > > > ssh in from another machine & do a 'sudo reboot now' and get an alert > > about 'Keyboard not found.' on power up. The keyboard also doesn't > > work in another machine so it's really & truly dead. > > > > I figure there's a high percentage of keyboard jockeys here so .. > > which keyboard do you like and why? > > I have several of the now classic IBM Model M keyboards I procured in > the '90s. Modern BIOSes don't like them even with a PS/2 to USB > adapter so I gave up on them. The Lenovo KU-0225 is a good keyboard > with the "standard" extra keys that are useful in some desktops. It is > full size and quiet. > > My main keyboard is a daskeyboard I bought several years ago with the > Cherry key switches It is thick so you might not like it and it is > loud. It has the same number of keys as the Lenovo, 104, I think. This > one was not cheap while the Lenovo was considerably less expensive. Full size and quiet are good qualities :) Tall not so much.. the Logitech that I pulled out of the closet and think is too high is less than 1 inch high. The Lenovo is listed as 1.34 inches, so that's probably not for me. Thick and loud is a no, so I'll pass on the daskeyboard. Thanks Lee
Re: what keyboard do you use?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 8:57 PM Russell L. Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:25:09PM -0500, Lee wrote: > >which keyboard do you like and why? > > CHERRY MX BOARD 3.0 (Purchased several years ago; in daily use since.) > Excellent mechanical quality of the keyswitch. Keyswitch plungers > which start sticking (high resistance upon depression) is the biggest > problem I have found. The next-greatest problem is intermittent > contact of key switch contacts. Both problems are maddening for the > touch typist. OK - good to know. I am a touch typist, so I guess I'm giving that one a pass. Thanks Lee
Re: what keyboard do you use?
I have two: a Kinesis Advantage 2 and a Corsair gaming mechanical keyboard, both USB connected. I use the latter almost exclusively and love it: the feel of the mechanical keys, the sound of those keys, and the keyboard lighting. I seldom use the Kinesis: just could not get used to it. -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-09-14) on Debian 12.2
Re: what keyboard do you use?
jeremy ardley wrote: > Lee wrote: > > > I bought a Dell desktop in 2019 and the keyboard just died :( > > I have decided to go to the mechanical keyboard style where you get positive > feedback on key strokes. > > For me there are two 'colors' that are interesting > > Blue which has strong tactile feedback, requires slight force, and gives a > loud audible mechanical click on each keystroke. > > Brown is the same as blue but has no load mechanical click, just the tactile > feedback. > > I don't necessarily make no mistakes but I know certainly when I have struck > a key. > > As far as brands go, most ones with names you don't recognise won't last a > year. Probably a logitech one would be O.K.? > > You can also get ones with keyboard lighting. It is actually helpful, though > ones that do light shows are to be avoided. Just a simple green or such and > perhaps ones that briefly dim the light on each key when you strike it. As far as I know, Logitech doesn't make a mechanical keyboard. Brands which have proven reliable to me: Keychron Ducky CoolerMaster's MasterKeys series -dsr-
Re: Effacement réel de fichiers
bonjour Korben recommande "shred" ou "secure-delete" source : https://korben.info/supprimer-fichier-sans-trace.html Erwann Le 02/02/2024 à 21:32, kaliderus a écrit : Bonjour, bonsoir chers Debianeux, Connaissez-vous un outil qui permette de mettre des 0 (ou des 1 ou n'importe quoi aléatoirement) partout là où un fichier n'est plus référencé dans le système de fichiers (du ext4 dans mon cas) ? En effet, mon idée est d'avoir une confidentialité maximale (avec les moyens qui sont les miens), donc un effacement total de chaque bit des fichiers qui ont été supprimés (typiquement pour pas que par exemple photorec puisse retrouver quoi que ce soit). Le disque de données est un SSD. J'ai beau googler le sujet depuis quelques jours je ne trouve rien, ou alors je n'ai pas les bons mots clés, snif... Merci par avance pour votre aimable collaboration. K.
Re: what keyboard do you use?
jeremy ardley wrote: ... > You can also get ones with keyboard lighting. It is actually helpful, > though ones that do light shows are to be avoided. Just a simple green > or such and perhaps ones that briefly dim the light on each key when you > strike it. you can change the light show by pressing various key combinations or you can use software to do it for you when the machine boots. i decided to just use the key presses and avoid having yet more packages installed. the light show i prefer for most typing is the one which lights up the key just a little when it is pressed. so it is not too bright as to be distracting but it does provide some feedback. you can adjust how bright you want it to be in five increments. i leave it at one. i rarely need to see all of the keys at one time. when getting going for the day i have an id and password so that is when i want all the keys visible - after that it rarely matters, but it is easy enough to change it back and forth. if you want to have some blinkin' lights you can put on some nice effects when you press keys, at night it can look like a Christmas tree. :) just to show someone. i find it too distracting for normal operation. songbird
Re: problèmes de copie sur un montage smb, crash kernel
bonjour Pas de pb constaté pour ma part. Peut-être que le fautif serait le serveur? Pour ma part : erwann@inspiron:~$ uname -a Linux inspiron *6.1.0-17-amd64* #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.69-1 (2023-12-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux erwann@inspiron:~$ grep synology /etc/fstab #synology:/volume1/pub /mnt/pub nfs nofail,soft,timeo=5,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,users,atime,rw,dev,exec,suid 0 0 synology:/volume1/pub /mnt/pub nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14 0 0 #synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr 0 0 synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,soft,timeo=5,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,users,atime,rw,dev,exec,suid 0 0 #synology:/volume1/backup /mnt/backup nfs nofail,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14 0 0 Les copies fonctionnent sans problème. Dans mon cas, le serveur NFS est un NAS Synology DS216se Je ne me souviens plus pourquoi j'ai des options différentes pour les deux points de montage. Erwann Le 02/02/2024 à 21:28, testeur a écrit : J'ai tenté les trois options de montage mais pas mieux. Le log du crash noyau est quasi identique. Ça semble venir du noyau 6.1.0-17. Car avec le noyau 6.1.0-10, pas de problèmes Je vais rester sur le noyau précédent... Cdlt On 01/02/2024 10:11, Michel Verdier wrote: Le 31 janvier 2024 testeur a écrit : voici les droits du montage : ├─/mnt/xxx /etc/autoxxx.smb autofs rw,relatime,fd=12,pgrp=1561,timeout=30,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect,pipe_ino=22915 │ └─/mnt/xxx/conf //xx.xx.xx.xx/xxx/conf cifs rw,relatime,vers=3.1.1,cache=strict,username=xxx,uid=1000,noforceuid,gid=1000,noforcegid,addr=xx.xx.xx.xx,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1,closetimeo=1 Tu peux peut-être essayer avec cache=none et hard (au lieu de soft) pour voir si tu obtiens plus d'infos. Tu peux aussi jouer avec echo_interval si ton réseau ou ton serveur distant est lent. Je ne me souviens plus pour autofs mais son timeout ne devrait-il pas être plus élevé que celui de cifs ?
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
Am 02.02.2024 um 15:10:32 Uhr schrieb Greg Wooledge: > It's dying, I would say. Not all the way dead just yet. That's why I think it's time to change to amd64 before it is completely dead. > The next release will not offer an *installer* for i386, but upgrades > from Debian 12 i386 to Debian 13 i386 might continue to work. IIRC those packages will still exist for backwards compatibility for certain application, but I read the rumor that no current i386 kernel will be available. -- Gruß Marco Spam und Werbung bitte an ichschickerekl...@cartoonies.org
Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
On 2/2/24 9:10 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: I am not sure what do you mean by "install that architecture". I have been using i386 versions of Debian, and I do not plan to reinstall it now just because the CPU may allow that. At some point, you will have to make a decision. i386 is going to stop being supported sooner or later. Yeah, I know that. Until then I will try to get the most out of this i386 installation as-is. In any case, I managed to get rid of some 250+ amd64 packages that came with pretty useless wine (5.0.3-3) installation from the bullseye repo. After deinstalling wine & related software (in Synaptic), I ran apt-get update, apt-get upgrade, and apt autoremove. It freed cca 1GB. After reboot, all was clean, so I decided to go with wine via WineHQ. I followed their published procedure for bullseye installation, and after a while it ended up with wine version 9, which for now seems functional. Will update the list in days to come ... Misko
