Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:12 PM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > > Greg Wooledge () wrote: > > > > > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, > > > bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Max Nikulin
On 17/03/2024 23:56, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:14:56PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: args() { printf '%s\0' a b c d; } args | xargs -0 sh -c 'count() { echo $#; }; count "$@"' sh-count It would be easier in the case of script file instead of shell function. An assumption is

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote: Tim's assumption here is that he can write a function which emits a stream of whitespace-separated words, and use this safely in an unquoted command substitution. count $(args) I'm guessing "count" is a stand-in for something more complex, but

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > Greg Wooledge () wrote: > > > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, > > bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken > > to calling the releases by their numbers (10, 11, 12)

Re: Re: Libreoffice y fuentes del paquete xfonts-scalable.

2024-03-17 Thread Jose Ab bA
Muchas gracias Camaleón por la aclaracion! Pues nada, a la vieja usanza: $ mkdir .fonts; cd .fonts; wget https://cdn1.maisfontes.com/temp/courier-10-pitch-maisfontes.f169.zip $ unzip courier-10-pitch-maisfontes.f169.zip; rm courier-10-pitch-maisfontes.f169.zip Y solucionao! Mira que me jode

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Miguel A. Vallejo
Greg Wooledge () wrote: > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, > bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken > to calling the releases by their numbers (10, 11, 12) instead of > their codenames to avoid confusion wherever possible. > I feel

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Can anybody suggest how to get the networking running? Have you searched the web for answered? I suspect searching for "get the networking running" or "fix my problems" will get you up and running in no time. Stefan

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:46:26PM +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 17.03.2024 um 16:54:27 Uhr schrieb David: > > > Can anybody suggest how to get the networking running? > > You have to tell us what doesn't work in your network. > > Also show the output of > ip a > cat /etc/resolv.conf I have a

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread Marco Moock
Am 17.03.2024 um 16:54:27 Uhr schrieb David: > Can anybody suggest how to get the networking running? You have to tell us what doesn't work in your network. Also show the output of ip a cat /etc/resolv.conf -- Gruß Marco Send spam to 1710690867mu...@cartoonies.org

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread tomas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 04:54:27PM +, David wrote: > I am running Bookworm on a thin client and Network-Manger seems to be > the source of my problems. > > I have purged Network-Manager from this thin client, but I can't find > out how to get /etc/network/interface to run. I have added to 2

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:54:27 + David wrote: > I am running Bookworm on a thin client and Network-Manger seems to be > the source of my problems. > > I have purged Network-Manager from this thin client, but I can't find > out how to get /etc/network/interface to run. I have added to 2 NIC's

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:31:40PM -0400, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote: > On Sunday 17 March 2024 08:48:29 am Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > > > Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye. > > > > It's not just

Re: Notificació d'incidències de Debian

2024-03-17 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola Narcis, > Algú sap explicar-me el perquè? Si estàs en una llista de correu on s'envien les notificacions o bé en algun moment t'has subscrit als avisos d'algun paquet via tracker.debian.org. Les capçaleres dels correus de notificació haurien de contenir més pistes sobre el seu origen. Si

Re: Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ
On Sonntag, 17. März 2024 13:54:27 -03 David wrote: > I am running Bookworm on a thin client and Network-Manger seems to be > the source of my problems. > > I have purged Network-Manager from this thin client, but I can't find > out how to get /etc/network/interface to run. I have added to 2

Bookworm Networking Issues

2024-03-17 Thread David
I am running Bookworm on a thin client and Network-Manger seems to be the source of my problems. I have purged Network-Manager from this thin client, but I can't find out how to get /etc/network/interface to run. I have added to 2 NIC's that I need. Can anybody suggest how to get the networking

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Roy J. Tellason, Sr.
On Sunday 17 March 2024 08:48:29 am Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > > Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye. > > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, > bullseye, bookworm) was in

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +, Tim Woodall wrote: In almost all other cases, the space separated items cannot, even in theory, contain a rogue space, so suppressing the warning is fine Famous Last Words™. As one example, it calls out to

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:57:43AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote: > What errors do you get if you use sh instead of bash? He's not getting any errors. His script actually works for his current inputs. He was just getting warnings from shellcheck, which is an external script validation tool. One

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Max Nikulin
On 17/03/2024 16:25, Tim Woodall wrote: args() { echo a b c d; } count() { echo $#; } count $(args) args() { printf '%s\0' a b c d; } args | xargs -0 sh -c 'count() { echo $#; }; count "$@"' sh-count It would be easier in the case of script file instead of shell function. An assumption is

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Nate Bargmann
Hi Tim. What errors do you get if you use sh instead of bash? On Debian systems sh should be a symbolic link to dash. On Debian dash is preferred for system shell scripts (perhaps even required now) and I use it for my personal scripts unless there is some need to use bash instead. I still use

Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Klaus Becker
Non, il faut chercher la commande correspondante pour gnome, à lancer en tant que utilisateur. Ou lightdm ou qc de ce genre pour lancer le gestionnaire de connexion graphique installé. Mais si X ne fonctionne pas du tout, ça ne peut pas fonctionner non plus Klaus

[resolu] Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
Problème résolu ! Je ne sais pas comment ça s'est fait mais gdm3, gnome-shell et gnome- session avaient été déinstallés ... Après les avoir remis tout est rentré dans l'ordre. Ouf ! Gaëtan

Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
Le dimanche 17 mars 2024 à 16:47 +0100, Gaëtan Perrier a écrit : > Le dimanche 17 mars 2024 à 16:25 +0100, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > > > Salut, > > > > j'ai parfois un problème du même genre sous instable. Comme > > workaround, > > je démarre XFCE4 en tty avec "startxfce4". > > > > Pour

Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
Le dimanche 17 mars 2024 à 16:25 +0100, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > Salut, > > j'ai parfois un problème du même genre sous instable. Comme > workaround, > je démarre XFCE4 en tty avec "startxfce4". > Pour Gnome, est-ce que c'est startx ? Gaëtan

Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
J'ai pu lancer synaptic via ssh -X et j'ai pu constater que le problème n'est pas lié aux paquets que je voulais retirer car en fait ils n'ont pas été retirés. Le plantage de X est donc intervenu juste avant et sans rapport. C'est donc liés aux mises à jours d'aujourd'hui... Le dimanche 17 mars

Re: [testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Klaus Becker
Am 17/03/2024 um 15:53 schrieb Gaëtan Perrier: Bonjour, Suite à la mise à jour d'aujourd'hui et au nettoyage de deux paquets libt* (je ne me souviens pas du nom exact) qui étaient indiqués comme plus disponibles j'ai perdu ma session graphique. Elle s'est fermée pendant la mise à jour ...

Re : apt pas content

2024-03-17 Thread nicolas . patrois
On 17/03/2024 14:26:24, Gaëtan Perrier wrote: > Justement, je suis en testing ;) > Mais ce je ne comprends pas c'est que gnutls semble à jour: Bonjour, J’ai un peu le même problème avec Sid. # apt full-upgrade [coupe coupe coupe] 794 mis à jour, 265 nouvellement installés, 318 à enlever et 18

[testing] plus de session graphique !

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
Bonjour, Suite à la mise à jour d'aujourd'hui et au nettoyage de deux paquets libt* (je ne me souviens pas du nom exact) qui étaient indiqués comme plus disponibles j'ai perdu ma session graphique. Elle s'est fermée pendant la mise à jour ... Depuis elle ne démarre plus mais je ne vois pas

Re: apt pas content

2024-03-17 Thread Gaëtan Perrier
Le samedi 16 mars 2024 à 15:29 +0100, BERTRAND Joël a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Il y a un gros problème avec gnutls mais je pensais que ça se > limitais > à testing. J'ai réussi à m'en sortir hier en forçant l'installation de > la mise à jour de gnutls et de ses dépendances et en

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread The Wanderer
On 2024-03-17 at 08:48, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > >> Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from >> Bullseye. > > It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, > bullseye, bookworm) was in my

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:35:33PM +0100, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote: > Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye. It's not just you. The use of three "b" names in a row (buster, bullseye, bookworm) was in my opinion a poor decision. I've taken to calling the releases by

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +, Tim Woodall wrote: > I have this one-liner (which works but shellcheck doesn't like the > quoting) > > idxsrc="$( newest_file $( APT_CONFIG=${APT_CONFIG} apt-get indextargets > --format '$(FILENAME)' 'Identifier: Packages' ))" > > SC2016: Expressions

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Tim Woodall
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +, Tim Woodall wrote: Hi, I've been cleaning up some bash scripts Good and, where possible, addressing things reported by shellcheck. Oh, shellcheck, https://www.shellcheck.net/ I have this one-liner

Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox

2024-03-17 Thread Miguel A. Vallejo
Well... it seems my brain can't distinguish Bookworm from Bullseye. Virtualbox is now installed from Fasttrack repository and is working fine. Sorry for the inconveniences

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +, Tim Woodall wrote: > Hi, > > I've been cleaning up some bash scripts Good > and, where possible, addressing things reported by shellcheck. Oh, shellcheck, https://www.shellcheck.net/ > I have this one-liner (which works but shellcheck doesn't like

Re: shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread tomas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +, Tim Woodall wrote: > Hi, [...] > Is there a one-liner way to make shellcheck happy on the count line > below (other than # shellcheck disable=SC2046)? > > args() { echo a b c d; } > count() { echo $#; } > count $(args) > > Obviously, any correct

Notificació d'incidències de Debian

2024-03-17 Thread Narcis Garcia
Bon dia, No sóc mantenidor de cap paquet de Debian ni porto cap tema dels repositoris o distribució però, des de fa un temps (ara ja anys), de tant en tant rebo notificació de què algú ha enregistrat una proposta o error al sistema de bugs.debian.org No estic parlant tampoc d'inciències

shellcheck, bashism's and one liners.

2024-03-17 Thread Tim Woodall
Hi, I've been cleaning up some bash scripts and, where possible, addressing things reported by shellcheck. I have this one-liner (which works but shellcheck doesn't like the quoting) idxsrc="$( newest_file $( APT_CONFIG=${APT_CONFIG} apt-get indextargets --format '$(FILENAME)' 'Identifier: